Overview and preliminary results of the US empirical HRA study

11th International Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference and the Annual European Safety and Reliability Conference 2012, PSAM11 ESREL 2012

Volumn 4, Issue , 2012, Pages 2924-2933

  Bye, Andreas ^a   Dang, Vinh N ^b   Forester, John ^c   Hildebrandt, Michael ^a   Marble, Julie ^d   Liao, Huafei ^c   Lois, Erasmia ^d  

^a INSTITUTE FOR ENERGY TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^b PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUTE   (Switzerland)

^c SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES   (United States)

^d U S NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION   (United States)

Author keywords

Benchmarking; Crew performance; HRA; PRA

Indexed keywords

CREW PERFORMANCE; EMPIRICAL DATA; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; HRA; HUMAN ACTIONS; HUMAN PERFORMANCE; HUMAN RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; METHOD ASSESSMENT; PERFORMANCE DATA; PRA; PROBABILISTIC RISK ASSESSMENT; REACTOR PROJECTS; TRAINING SIMULATOR;

FORECASTING; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; SAFETY ENGINEERING; SIMULATORS;

BENCHMARKING;

EID: 84873144614     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. Marble J, Liao H, Forester J, Bye A, Dang VN, Presley M, Lois E. Results and Insights Derived from the Intra-Method Comparisons of the US Empirical HRA Study. Proc. PSAM11&ESREL2012, June 25-29, 2012, Helsinki, Finland.
2. Lois E, Dang VN, Forester J, Broberg H, Massaiu S, Hildebrandt M, Braarud PØ, Parry G, Julius J, Boring R, Männistö I, and Bye A. International HRA Empirical Study-Phase 1 Report: Description of Overall Approach and Pilot Phase Results from Comparing HRA Methods to Simulator Data. HWR-844, OECD Halden Reactor Project, Halden, Norway and NUREG/IA-0216, Vol. 1. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, 2009.
3. Bye A, Lois E, Dang VN, Parry G, Forester J, Massaiu S, Boring R, Braarud PØ, Broberg H, Julius J, Männistö I, and Nelson P. International HRA Empirical Study-Phase 2 Report: Results from Comparing HRA Method Predictions to Simulator Data from SGTR Scenarios. HWR-915, OECD Halden Reactor Project, Halden, Norway and NUREG/IA-0216, Vol. 2. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, 2011.
4. Dang VN, Forester J, Boring R, Broberg H, Massaiu S, Julius J, Männistö I, Nelson P, Lois E, and Bye A. International HRA Empirical Study-Phase 3 Report: Results from Comparing HRA Method Predictions to Simulator Data on LOFW Scenarios. HWR-951, OECD Halden Reactor Project, Halden, Norway, 2011. To be issued as NUREG/IA-0216 Vol. 3.
5. Forester J, Lois E, Dang VN, Bye A and Boring RL. Conclusions on Human Reliability Analysis (HRA) Methods from the International HRA Empirical Study. Proc. PSAM11&ESREL2012, June 25- 29, 2012, Helsinki, Finland.
6. Kolaczkowski A, Forester J, Lois E, Cooper S. Good Practices for Implementing Human Reliability Analysis (HRA). NUREG-1792, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC, USA, 2005.
7. Broberg H, Hildebrandt M, Nowell R. Results from the 2010 HRA Data Collection at a US PWR Training Simulator. HWR-981, OECD Halden Reactor Project, Halden, Norway, 2011.
8. Kirwan B, Umbers I, Edmunds J, Gibson H. Quantifying the Unimaginable - the Case for Human Performance Limiting Values. Proc. 8th Int. Conf. on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (PSAM9), 18-23 May 2008, Hong Kong, China.
9. Skjerve AB, Bye A. Towards guidance for assessment of "training" as a performance-shaping factor in human reliability analysis. Proc. PSAM11&ESREL2012, June 25-29, 2012, Helsinki, Finland.