Cell specific ultrasound effects are dose and frequency dependent

Annals of Anatomy

Volumn 195, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 57-67

  Schuster, A ^a   Schwab, T ^a   Bischof, M ^a   Klotz, M ^a   Lemor, R ^b   Degel, C ^b   Schafer K H ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES KAISERSLAUTERN   (Germany)

^b FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Adenocarcinoma; Endothelial cells; Energy density; Epithelial cells; Frequency; Neuroblastoma; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ACTIN FILAMENT; ADENOCARCINOMA; ANIMAL CELL; APOPTOSIS; ARTICLE; CARCINOMA CELL; CELL ACTIVITY; CELL COUNT; CELL DENSITY; CELL DESTRUCTION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL FUNCTION; CELL GROWTH; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL STIMULATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFERENTIAL IN GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; DOG; ENDOTHELIUM CELL; ENERGY DENSITY; EPITHELIUM CELL; GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; GENERATOR; GROWTH INHIBITION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING; MICROVILLUS; MOUSE; NEUROBLASTOMA CELL; NEUROFILAMENT; NONHUMAN; OSCILLOSCOPE; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; RADIATION DOSE; RADIOFREQUENCY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPE; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ULTRASOUND; ULTRASOUND THERAPY; ULTRASOUND TRANSDUCER;

ANIMALS; APOPTOSIS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINE; CELL LINE, TUMOR; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELLS; DOGS; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, RADIATION; ELECTROPHORESIS, GEL, TWO-DIMENSIONAL; FLUORESCENT ANTIBODY TECHNIQUE; HUMANS; LIPOSOMES; MICE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; PROTEOME; ULTRASONICS;

EID: 84873093011     PISSN: 09409602     EISSN: 16180402     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2012.03.008     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Atar S., Rosenschein U. Perspectives on the role of ultrasonic devices in thrombolysis. J. Thromb. Thrombolys. 2004, 17:107-114.
2. Chen Y.J., Wang C.J., Yang K.D., Chang P.R., Huang H.C., Huang Y.T., Sun Y.C., Wang F.S. Pertussis toxin-sensitive Gαi protein and ERK-dependent pathways mediate ultrasound promotion of osteogenic transcription in human osteoblasts. FEBS Lett. 2003, 554:154-158.
3. Chumakova O.V., Liopo A.V., Evers B.M., Esenaliev R.O. Effect of 5-fluorouracil, Optison and ultrasound on MCF-7 cell viability. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2006, 32:751-758.
4. Claes L., Willie B. The enhancement of bone regeneration by ultrasound. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2007, 93:384-398.
5. Doyle T.E., Goodrich J.B., Ambrose B.J., Patel H., Kwon S., Pearson L.H. Ultrasonic differentiation of normal versus malignant breast epithelial cells in monolayer cultures. JASA 2010, 128:229-235.
6. Ellwart J.W., Brettel H., Kober L.O. Cell membrane damage by ultrasound at different cell concentrations. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 1988, 14:43-50.
7. Feng Y., Tian Z.M., Wan M.X., Zheng Z.B. Low intensity ultrasound-induced apoptosis in human gastric carcinoma cells. World J. Gastroenterol. 2008, 14:4873-4879.
8. Hasanova G.I., Noriega S.E., Mamedov T.G., Thakurta S.G., Turner J.A., Subramanian A. The effect of ultrasound stimulation on the gene and protein expression of chondrocytes seeded in chitosan scaffolds. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2011, 65:212-215.
9. Honda H., Kondo T., Zhao Q.L., Feril L.B., Kitagawa H. Role of intracellular calcium ions and reactive oxygen species in apoptosis induced by ultrasound. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2004, 30:683-692.
10. Iro H., Feigl T., Zenk J., Waldfahrer F. In vitro effects of high-energy pulsed ultrasound on human squamous cell carcinoma cells. EUFOS 1996, 253:11-16.
11. Kaestner L. Evaluation of human erythrocytes as model cells in photodynamic therapy. Gen. Physiol. Biophys. 2003, 22:455-465.
12. Kennedy J.E. High-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of solid tumours. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2005, 5:321-327.
13. Lagneaux L., de Meulenaer E.C., Delforge A., Dejeneffe M., Massy M., Moerman C., Hannecart B., Canivet Y., Lepeltier M.F., Bron D. Ultrasonic low-energy treatment: a novel approach to induce apoptosis in human leukemic cells. Exp. Hematol. 2002, 30:1293-1301.
14. Lejbkowicz F., Zwiran M., Salzberg S. The response of normal and malignant cells to ultrasound in vitro. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 1993, 19:75-82.
15. Lejbkowicz F., Salzberg S. Distinct sensitivity of normal and malignant cells to ultrasound in vitro. EHP 1997, 105(Suppl.):1575-1578.
16. Leung K.S., Cheung W.H., Zhang C., Lee K.M., Lo H.K. Low intensity pulsed ultrasound stimulates osteogenic activity of human periosteal cells. Clin. Orthop. 2004, 418:253-259.
17. Madin S.H., Darby N.B. Established kidney cell lines of normal adult bovine and ovine origin. Exp. Biol. Med. 1958, 98:574-576.
18. Morrissey J.M., Taylor K.D., Gilman S.D. Ultrasound-mediated release of iron from ferritin. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2003, 29:1799-1803.
19. Mortimer A.J., Dyson M. The effect of therapeutic ultrasound on calcium uptake in fibroblasts. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 1988, 14:499-506.
20. Olmsted J.B., Carlson K., Klebe R., Ruddle F., Rosenbaum J. Isolation of microtubule protein from cultured mouse neuroblastoma cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1970, 65:129-136.
21. Pavalko F.M., Chen N.X., Turner C.H., Burr D.B., Atkinson S., Hsieh Y.F., Qiu J., Duncan R.L. Fluid shear-induced mechanical signaling in MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts requires cytoskeleton-integrin interactions. Am. J. Physiol. 1998, 275:C1591-C1601.
22. Prausnitz M.R., Mitragotri S., Langer R. Current status and future potential of transdermal drug delivery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2004, 3:115-124.
23. Ramli R., Reher P., Harris M., Meghji S. The effect of ultrasound on angiogenesis: an in vivo study using the chick chorioallantoic membrane. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant 2009, 24:591-596.
24. Reher P., Doan N., Bradnock B., Meghji S., Harris M. Therapeutic ultrasound for osteoradionecrosis: an in vitro comparison between 1MHz and 45kHz machines. Eur. J. Cancer 1998, 34:1962-1968.
25. Rott H.-D. Zur Frage der Schädigungsmöglichkeit durch diagnostischen Ultraschall. Ultraschall 1981, 2:56-64.
26. Rott H.-D. Ultraschalldiagnostik: Neuere Bewertung der biologischen Sicherheit. Deut. Ärtzeblatt 1996, 93:1533-1537.
27. Rousset M. The human colon carcinoma cell lines HT-29 and Caco-2: two in vitro models for the study of intestinal differentiation. Biochimie 1986, 68:1035-1040.
28. Sacco R.L., Chong J.Y., Prabhakaran S., Elkind M.S.V. Experimental treatments for acute ischaemic stroke. Lancet 2007, 369:331-341.
29. Schmelz A., Kinzl L., Einsiedel T., Beck A., Keppler P., Kramer M. Eine neue Therapieoption in der Wundbehandlung?. Klinikarzt 2004, 33:251-254.
30. Schreiber U., Ott L., Steiner R., Smolenski U., Callies R., Kleditzsch J. Ultraschalldosis als Intensitäts-Zeit-Produkt - Untersuchungen mittels Laser-Doppler-Spektroskopie. Phys. Med. Rehab. Kuror. 1995, 5:139-141.
31. Watanabe Y., Matsushita T., Bhandari M., Zdero R., Schemitsch E.H. Ultrasound for fracture healing: current evidence. J. Orthop. Trauma 2010, 24(Suppl. 1):56-61.
32. Wu F., Shao Z.Y., Zhai B.J., Zhao C.L., Shen D.M. Ultrasound reverses multidrug resistance in human cancer cells by altering gene expression of ABC transporter proteins and Bax protein. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2011, 37:151-159.
33. Zhang Z.J., Huckle J., Francomano C.A., Spencer R.G.S. The effects of pulsed low-intensity ultrasound on chondrocyte viability, proliferation, gene expression and matrix production. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2003, 29:1645-1651.
34. Zhou S., Schmelz A., Seufferlein T., Li Y., Zhao J., Bachem M.G. Molecular mechanisms of low intensity pulsed ultrasound in human skin fibroblasts. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279:54463-54469.