Issue linkage in clean technology cooperation: For better or worse?

Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 147-155

  Urpelainen, Johannes ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

Clean technology; Environmental policy; Game theory; Issue linkage; Keyword: International cooperation

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION; CONSUMER PROTECTION; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GAME THEORY; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES; CONSUMER PRICES; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; GAME THEORETIC ANALYSIS; INTERNATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS; ISSUE LINKAGE;

ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 84873087309     PISSN: 1618954X     EISSN: 16189558     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10098-012-0493-2     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Abbott KW, Snidal D (1998) Why states act through formal international organizations. J Confl Resolut 42(1):3-32
2. Barrett S (2006) Climate treaties and 'breakthrough' technologies. Am Econ Rev 96(2):22-25
3. Barrett S (2008) Climate treaties and the imperative of enforcement. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 24(2):239-258
4. Barrett S, Toman M (2010) Contrasting future paths for an evolving global climate regime. Glob Policy 1(1):64-74
5. Carraro C, Siniscalco D (1995) R&D cooperation and the stability of International Environmental Agreements. CEPR Discussion Paper 1154
6. de Coninck H, Fischer C, Newell RG, Ueno T (2008) International technology-oriented agreements to address climate change. Energy Policy 36(1):335-356
7. Haas EB (1980) Why collaborate? Issue-linkage and international regimes. World Politics 32(3):357-405
8. Hart JA (1993) The use of R&D consortia as market barriers: case studies of consortia in the United States, Japan, and Western Europe. Int Exec 35(1):11-33
9. Heymann M (1998) Signs of Hubris: the shaping of wind technology styles in Germany, Denmark, and the United States, 1940-1990. Technol Cult re 39(4):641-670
10. Hoel M, de Zeeuw A (2010) Can a focus on breakthrough technologies improve the performance of International Environmental Agreements? Environ Resour Econ 47(3):395-406
11. Kemfert C (2004) Climate coalitions and international trade: assessment of cooperation incentives by issue linkage. Energy Policy 32(4):455-465
12. Keohane RO (1986) Reciprocity in international relations. Int Org 40(1):1-27
13. Laird FN, Stefes C (2009) The diverging paths of German and United States policies for renewable energy: sources of difference. Energy Policy 37(7):2619-2629
14. Levi MA, Economy EC, O'Neil SK, Segal A (2010) Energy innovation: driving technology competition and cooperation among the US, China, India, and Brazil. Council on Foreign Relations, November 2010
15. Lewis JI (2007) Technology acquisition and innovation in the developing world: wind turbine development in China and India. Stud Comp Int Dev 42(3-4):208-232
16. Lewis JI, Wiser RH (2007) Fostering a renewable energy technology industry: an international comparison of wind industry policy support mechanisms. Energy Policy 35(3):1844-1857
17. Limão N (2005) Trade policy, cross-border externalities and lobbies: do linked agreements enforce more cooperative outcomes? J Int Econ 67(1):175-199
18. Lipp J (2007) Lessons for effective renewable electricity policy from Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom. Energy Policy 35(11):5481-5495
19. Lohmann S (1997) Linkage politics. J Confl Resolut 41(1):38-67
20. Ostry S, Nelson RR (1995) Techno-nationalism and techno-globalism: conflict and cooperation. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC
21. Oye KA (1992) Economic discrimination and political exchange: world political economy in the 1930s and 1980s. Princeton University Press, Princeton
22. PCT (2009) Who's winning the clean energy race? Growth, competition and opportunity in the world's largest economies. Pew Charitable Trusts, Washington, DC
23. Rabe B (2004) Statehouse and greenhouse: the evolving politics of American climate change policy. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC
24. Robbins N, Clover R, Singh C (2009) A climate for recovery: the colour of stimulus goes green. HSCB Global Research, London
25. Sandholtz W (1992) High-tech Europe: the politics of international cooperation. University of California Press, Berkeley
26. Sebenius JK (1983) Negotiation arithmetic: adding and subtracting issues and parties. Int Org 37(2):281-316
27. Sugiyama T, Sintom J (2005) Orchestra of treaties: a future climate regime scenario with multiple treaties among like-minded countries. Int Environ Agreem 5(1):65-88
28. Tollison RD, Willett TD (1979) An economic theory of mutually advantageous issue linkages in international negotiations. Int Org 33(4):425-449
29. Tucker JB (1991) Partners and rivals: a model of international collaboration in advanced technology. Int Org 45(1):83-120
30. Urpelainen J (2011) International technology cooperation: the problem of commercial rivalry. Rev Policy Res 28(5):423-450
31. Urpelainen J (2012) The strategic design of technology funds for climate cooperation: generating joint gains. Environ Sci Policy 15(1):92-105
32. Victor DG (2011) Global warming gridlock: creating more effective strategies for protecting the planet. Cambridge University Press, New York
33. Watanabe C, Wakabayashi K, Miyazawa T (2000) Industrial dynamism and the creation of a 'Virtuous Cycle' between R&D, market growth and price reduction: the case of photovoltaic power generation (PV) development in Japan. Technovation 20(6):299-312