Discovering mammography-based machine learning classifiers for breast cancer diagnosis

Journal of Medical Systems

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 2259-2269

  Ramos Pollán, Raúl ^a   Guevara López, Miguel Angel ^b   Suárez Ortega, Cesar ^a   Díaz Herrero, Guillermo ^a   Franco Valiente, Jose Miguel ^a   Rubio Del Solar, Manuel ^a   González De Posada, Naimy ^b   Vaz, Mario Augusto Pires ^b   Loureiro, Joana ^c   Ramos, Isabel ^c  

^a CETA CIEMAT(Center of Extremadura for Advanced Technologies)   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

^c University of Porto   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Breast cancer CAD; Machine learning classifiers; Mammography classifiers

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT REDUCTION; BREAST CANCER; CLASSIFIER; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BREAST TUMOR; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER SYSTEM; FEMALE; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COMPUTER SYSTEMS; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAMMOGRAPHY;

EID: 84873050658     PISSN: 01485598     EISSN: 1573689X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10916-011-9693-2     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Althuis, M. D., et al., Global trends in breast cancer incidence and mortality 1973-1997. Int. J. Epidemiol. 34:405-412, 2005. April 1, 2005.
2. Veloso, V., "Cancro da mama mata 5 mulheres por dia em Portugal,". In: (Ed.) CiênciaHoje. Lisboa, Portugal, 2009
3. Tabár, L., et al., Beyond randomized controlled trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality. Cancer 91:1724-1731, 2001.
4. Brown, J., et al., Mammography screening: an incremental cost effectiveness analysis of double versus single reading of mammograms, BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 312:809-812, 1996.
5. Sampat, M. P., et al., Computer-Aided Detection and Diagnosis in Mammography. In: Al, B. (Ed.), Handbook of Image and Video Processing, Secondth edition. Academic, ed Burlington, pp. 1195-1217, 2005.
6. López, Y., et al., "Breast cancer diagnosis based on a suitable combination of deformable models and artificial neural networks techniques,". In: Progress in Pattern Recognition, Image Analysis and Applications. vol. Volume 4756/2008, ed: Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, 2008, pp. 803-811.
7. López, Y., et al., "Computer aided diagnosis system to detect breast cancer pathological lesions," In: Progress in Pattern Recognition, Image Analysis and Applications. vol. Volume 5197/2008, ed: Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, 2008, pp. 453-460.
8. Ramos-Pollan, R. et al., "Exploiting eInfrastructures for medical image storage and analysis: A grid application for mammography CAD,". In: The Seventh IASTED International Conference on Biomedical Engineering, Innsbruck, Austria, 2010
9. Ramos-Pollan, R., et al., "Grid-based architecture to host multiple repositories: A mammography image analysis use case,". In: III Iberian Grid Infrastructure Conference Proceedings, Valencia, Spain, 2009, pp. 327-338
10. Ramos-Pollan, R., et al., "Building medical image repositories and CAD systems on grid infrastructures: A mammograms case,". In: 15th edition of the Portuguese Conference on Pattern Recognition., University of Aveiro. Aveiro, Portugal, 2009.
11. Ramos-Pollan, R., et al., "Grid computing for breast cancer CAD. A pilot experience in a medical environment,". In: 4th Iberian Grid Infrastructure Conference, Minho, Portugal, 2010, pp. 307-318.
12. NEMA. (2010), Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine. Available: http://dicom.nema.org/
13. Espert, I. B., et al., Content-based organisation of virtual repositories of DICOM objects. Future Gener Comput. Syst. 25:627-637, 2009.
14. D'Orsi, C. J., et al., Breast imaging reporting and data system: ACR BI-RADS-mammography, 4th Edition ed.: American College of Radiology, 2003.
15. Chenyang, X., and Prince, J. L., Snakes, shapes, and gradient vector flow. Image Process. IEEE Trans. 7:359-369, 1998.
16. Liang, J., et al., United snakes. Med. Image Anal. 10:215-233, 2006.
17. Rodenacker, K., A feature set for cytometry on digitized microscopic images. Cell Pathol 25:1-36, 2001.
18. Haralick, R., et al., Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. SMC-3:610-621, 1973.
19. Oliver, A., et al., A review of automatic mass detection and segmentation in mammographic images. Med. Image Anal. 14:87-110, 2010.
20. Mark Hall, et al., "The WEKA data mining software: an update," SIGKDD Explorations, vol. 11, 2009.
21. Park, S. C., et al., Improving performance of computer-Aided detection scheme by combining results from two machine learning classifiers. Acad. Radiol. 16:266-274, 2009.
22. Verma, B., et al., Classification of benign and malignant patterns in digital mammograms for the diagnosis of breast cancer. Expert Syst. Appl. 37:3344-3351, 2010.
23. Mavroforakis, M. E., et al., Mammographic masses characterization based on localized texture and dataset fractal analysis using linear, neural and support vector machine classifiers. Artif. Intell. Med. 37:145-162, 2006.
24. Mavroforakis, M., et al., Significance analysis of qualitative mammographic features, using linear classifiers, neural networks and support vector machines. Eur. J. Radiol. 54:80-89, 2005.
25. Butler, S. M., et al., A case study in feature invention for breast cancer diagnosis using X-ray scatter images. In: Gedeon, T. D., and Fung, L. C. C. (Eds.), AI 2003: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. vol. 2903. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 677-685, 2003.
26. Song, J. H., et al., Comparative analysis of logistic regression and artificial neural network for computer-Aided diagnosis of breast masses. Acad. Radiol. 12:487-495, 2005.
27. Abonyi, J., and Szeifert, F., Supervised fuzzy clustering for the identification of fuzzy classifiers. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 24:2195-2207, 2003.
28. Setiono, R., Generating concise and accurate classification rules for breast cancer diagnosis. Artif. Intell. Med. 18:205-219, 2000.
29. Fan, C.-Y., et al., A hybrid model combining case-based reasoning and fuzzy decision tree for medical data classification. Appl. Soft Comput. 11:632-644, 2011.
30. Sweilam, N. H., et al., Support vector machine for diagnosis cancer disease: A comparative study. Egypt. Inform. J. 11:81-92, 2010.
31. Bishop, C. M., Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition: Oxford University Press, Inc., 1995.
32. Heaton, J., "Programming Neural Networks with Encog 2 in Java," ed: Heaton Research, Inc., 2010.
33. Chang, C-C., and LinC.-J., (2001, LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. Available: http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvm
34. Foster, I, and Kesselman, C., The Grid 2, Second Edition: Blueprint for a New Computing Infrastructure, 2nd ed.: Elsevier, 2004.
35. The gLite middleware. Available: http://glite.web.cern.ch
36. Ramos Pollan, R., et al., "Introducing ROC curves as error measure functions. A new approach to train ANN-based biomedical data classifiers,". In: 15th Iberoamerican Congress on Pattern Recognition, Sao Paolo, Brasil, 2010.
37. Yoon, H. J., et al., Evaluating computer-Aided detection algorithms. Med. Phys. 34:2024-2038, 2007.
38. Fawcett, T., An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 27:861-874, 2006.
39. John Eng, M. D., (2006, March 7). ROC analysis: Web-based calculator for ROC curves. Available: http://www.jrocfit.org
40. Kim, J.-H., Estimating classification error rate: Repeated cross-validation, repeated hold-out and bootstrap. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 53:3735-3745, 2009.
41. Efron, B., and Gong, G., A Leisurely Look at the Bootstrap, the Jackknife, and Cross-Validation. Am. Stat. 37:36-48, 1983.
42. Efron, B., Estimating the error rate of a prediction rule: Improvement on cross-validation. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 78:316-331, 1983.