Mercury oxidation and adsorption characteristics of potassium permanganate modified lignite semi-coke

Journal of Environmental Sciences (China)

Volumn 24, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 2083-2090

  Zhang, Huawei ^a   Chen, Jitao ^a   Liang, Peng ^a   Wang, Li ^a  

^a SHANDONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Elemental mercury; Lignite semi coke; Potassium permanganate modification; Removal efficiency

Indexed keywords

ADSORPTION; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; COKE; EFFICIENCY; GAS ADSORPTION; LIGNITE; MANGANESE OXIDE; MERCURY (METAL); OXIDATION; POTASSIUM; TEMPERATURE; X RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY; X RAY POWDER DIFFRACTION;

ADSORPTION CHARACTERISTIC; BRUNAUER EMMETT TELLERS; ELEMENTAL MERCURY; ELEMENTAL MERCURY EMISSION; PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES; POTASSIUM PERMANGANATE; REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES; SEMI-COKE;

MANGANESE;

ADSORPTION; LIGNITE; MERCURY (ELEMENT); OXIDATION; X-RAY SPECTROSCOPY;

EID: 84873046567     PISSN: 10010742     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1001-0742(11)61047-4     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Behra P, Bonnissel-Gissinger P, Alnot M, Revel R, Ehrhardt J J, 2001. XPS and XAS study of sorption of Hg(II) onto pyrite. Langmuir, 17(13): 3970-3979. (Pubitemid 35330350)
2. Bolger P T, Szlag D C, 2002. An electrochemical system for removing and recovering elemental mercury from a gas stream. Environmental Science & Technology, 36(20): 4430-4435.
3. Dash S, Patel S, Mishra B K, 2009. Oxidation by permanganate: Synthetic and mechanistic aspects. Tetrahedron, 65(4): 707-739.
4. Dubinin M M, 1989. Fundmentals of the theory of adsorption in micropores of carbon adsorbents: Characteristics of their adsorption properties and microporous structures. Carbon, 27(3): 457-467. (Pubitemid 20613122)
5. Feng W G, Borguet E, Vidic R D, 2006. Sulfurization of a carbon surface for vapor phase mercury removal(II): Sulfer forms and mercury uptake. Carbon, 44(14): 2998-3004. (Pubitemid 44415734)
6. Gálvez M E, Boyano A, Lázaro M J, Moliner R, 2008. A study of the mechanisms of NO reduction over vanadium loaded activated carbon catalysts. Chemical Engineering Journal, 144(1): 10-20.
7. Gatica J M, Vidal H, 2010. Non-cordierite clay-based structured materials for environmental applications. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 181(1-3): 9-18.
8. Herranz T, Rojas S, Ojeda M, Perez-Alonso F J, Tefferos P, Pirota K et al., 2006. Synthesis, structural features, and reactivity of Fe-Mn mixed oxides prepared by microemulsion. Chemistry of Materials, 18(9): 2364-2375. (Pubitemid 43836586)
9. Hower J C, Senior C L, Suuberg E M, Hurt R H, Wilcox J L et al., 2010. Mercury capture by native fly ash carbons in coalfired power plants. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 36(4): 510-529.
10. Hsi H, Rood M J, Abadi M R, Chen S, Chang R, 2001. Effects of sulfur impregnation temperature on the properties and mercury adsorption capacities of activated carbon fibers (ACFs). Environmental Science & Technology, 25(13): 2785-2791. (Pubitemid 32880737)
11. Hutson N D, Attwood B C, Scheckel K G, 2007. XAS and XPS characterization of mercury binding on brominated activated carbon. Environmental Science & Technology, 41(5): 1747-1752. (Pubitemid 46362481)
12. Jurng J, Lee T G, Lee G W, Lee S J, Kim B H, Seier J, 2002. Mercury removal from incineration flue gas by organic and inorganic adsorbents. Chemosphere, 47(9): 907-913. (Pubitemid 34546761)
13. Lee S J, See Y C, Jurng J, Lee G L, 2004. Removal of gas-phase elemental mercury by iodine-and chlorine-impregnated activated carbons. Atmosphere Environment, 38(29): 4887-4893. (Pubitemid 39078329)
14. Lee S S, Lee J Y, Keener T C, 2009. Mercury oxidation and adsorption characteristics of chemically promoted activated carbon sorbents. Fuel Processing Technology, 90(10): 1314-1318.
15. 0. Advanced Materials Research, 356-360: 1350-1355.
16. 3 at lower temperatures. Environmental Science & Technology, 44(1): 426-431.
17. Li N, Bai R B, Liu C K, 2005. Enhanced and selective adsorption of mercury ions on chitosan beads grafted with polyacrylamide via surface initiated atom transfer radical polymerization. Langmuir, 21(25): 11780-11787. (Pubitemid 43011518)
18. Li Y H, Lee C H, Gullett B K, 2003. Importance of activated carbon's oxygen surface functional groups on elemental mercury adsorption. Fuel, 82(4): 451-457. (Pubitemid 35465821)
19. Mei Z J, Shen Z M, Zhao Q J, Wang W H, Zhang Y J, 2008. Removal and recovery of gas-phase element mercury by metal oxide-loaded activated carbon. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 152(2): 721-729.
20. 2 precipitation. American Mineralogist, 83(3-4): 305-315.
21. 4 fractured in situ. Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena, 74(2): 135-148.
22. Pirrone N, Cinnirella S, Feng X, Finkelman R B, Friedli H R, Leaner J et al., 2010. Global mercury emissions to the atmosphere from anthropogenic and natural sources. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 10(13): 5951-5964.
23. Presto A A, Granite E J, 2006. Survey of catalysts for oxidation of mercury in flue gas. Environmental Science & Technology, 40(18): 5601-5609. (Pubitemid 44413704)
24. Shangguan J, Li Z L, Li C H, 2005. Investigation on activated semi-coke desulfurization. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 17(1): 91-94. (Pubitemid 41199935)
25. Sundseth K, Pacyna J M, Pacyna B G, Munthe J, Belhaj M, Astrom S, 2010. Economic benefits from decreased mercury emissions: projection for 2020. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(4): 386-394.
26. 4. Chemical Research in Chinese University, 26(2): 283-286.
27. 5/AC catalyst. Fuel Processing Technology, 91(6): 676-680.
28. 2 composites. Energy & Fuels, 25(4): 1553-1558.
29. Yuan M J, Tong S T, Zhao S Q, Jia C Q, 2010. Adsorption of polycylic aromatic hydrocarbons from water using petroleum coke-derived porous carbon. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 181(1-3): 1115-1120.
30. Zielke U, Hültinger K J, Hoffman W P, 1996. Surface-oxidized carbon fibers: I. Surface structure and chemistry. Carbon, 34(8): 983-998. (Pubitemid 126341064)