Mercury removal from incineration flue gas by organic and inorganic adsorbents

Chemosphere

Volumn 47, Issue 9, 2002, Pages 907-913

  Jurng, Jongsoo ^a   Lee, Tai Gyu ^c   Lee, Gyo Woo ^a   Lee, Sung Jun ^a   Kim, Byung Hwa ^a   Seier, Jochen ^b  

^a Korea Institute of Science and Technology   (South Korea)

^b KIST   (Germany)

^c Yonsei University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Activated carbon; Chemisorption; Mercury emissions; Physisorption; Wood char

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATED CARBON; ADSORBENTS; BENTONITE; GASIFICATION; INCINERATION; MERCURY (METAL); ZEOLITES;

MERCURY REMOVAL;

FLUE GASES;

ACTIVATED CARBON; ADSORBENT; BENTONITE; CARBON MONOXIDE; HYDROCHLORIC ACID; INORGANIC COMPOUND; MERCURY; NITRIC OXIDE; ORGANIC COMPOUND; SULFUR DIOXIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; WATER; WOOD CHAR; ZEOLITE; CARBON;

ACTIVATED CARBON; ADSORPTION; FLUE GAS; GAS-GAS SEPARATION; INCINERATION; POLLUTANT REMOVAL;

ARTICLE; COMBUSTION; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; ECOTOXICITY; FLOW RATE; FLUE GAS; GAS FLOW; INCINERATION; MERCURIALISM; METAL RECOVERY; PROCESS MONITORING; PRODUCT RECOVERY; PRODUCTIVITY; SIMULATION; WOOD; ADSORPTION; AIR POLLUTION; CHEMISTRY; GAS; WASTE DISPOSAL;

ADSORPTION; AIR POLLUTION; BENTONITE; CARBON; GASES; INCINERATION; MERCURY; REFUSE DISPOSAL; WOOD; ZEOLITES;

EID: 0035985844     PISSN: 00456535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0045-6535(01)00329-0     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Investigations on the removal of gaseous mercury by sorbents at the TAMARA waste incineration plant
2. Mercury measurement and its control: What we know, have learned, and need to further investigate
3. Effects of sulfur impregnation temperature on the properties and mercury adsorption capacities of activated carbon fibers ACFs
4. Fly ash capture of mercuric chloride vapors from exhaust combustion gas
5. Effect of sulfur impregnation method on activated carbon uptake of gas-phase mercury
6. Adsorption of mercuric chloride vapours from incinerator flue gases on calcium hydroxide particles
7. Comparison of mercury capture efficiencies of three different in situ generated sorbents
8. Optimization of sulfur impregnation protocol for fixed-bed application of activated carbon-based sorbents for gas-phase mercury removal
9. Removal and measurement of mercury in the thermal treatment of wastes
10. 2 and NO removal from flue gas by adsorption on activated carbons
11. Capture of mercury in combustion systems by in situ generated titania particles with UV irradiation