A new configuration for decoking process in series reactors

Chemical Engineering Journal

Volumn 215-216, Issue , 2013, Pages 418-431

  Dehghani, O ^a   Gholipour, M R ^a   Shokrollahi Yancheshmeh, M S ^a   Seifzadeh Haghighi, S ^a   Ghaemi, M ^a   Rahimpour, M R ^a   Shariati, A ^a  

^a SHIRAZ UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Catalyst regeneration; Decoking process; Mathematical modeling; Novel configuration; Series reactors

Indexed keywords

ACETYLENE HYDROGENATION; AIR FLOW-RATE; BED TEMPERATURE; BURNING PROCESS; CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PROCESS; DECOKING; MODEL OUTPUTS; NOVEL CONFIGURATION; PETROCHEMICAL COMPANY; REGENERATION PROCESS; REGENERATION TIME; SYSTEM USE;

ACETYLENE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

CATALYST REGENERATION;

EID: 84873044503     PISSN: 13858947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.09.131     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Behroozi A., Hatamipour M.S., Rahimi A. Mathematical modeling and parametric study of coke-burning process in a hydrocracker reactor. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2012, 38:44-51.
2. Bartholomew C.H. Mechanisms of catalyst deactivation. Appl. Catal. A 2001, 212:17-60.
3. Bartholomew C. Catalyst deactivation and regeneration. ChemInform 2007, 38. no-no.
4. Ertl G., Knözinger H., Schüth F., Weitkamp J. Handbook of Heterogeneous Catalysis 2008, Wiley-VCH.
5. Hu H., Cao F., Ying W., Sun Q., Fang D. Study of coke behaviour of catalyst during methanol-to-olefins process based on a special TGA reactor. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 160:770-778.
6. He S., Sun C., Yang X., Wang B., Dai X., Bai Z. Characterization of coke deposited on spent catalysts for long-chain-paraffin dehydrogenation. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 163:389-394.
7. Liu R.J., Crozier P., Smith C., Hucul D., Blackson J., Salaita G. Metal sintering mechanisms and regeneration of palladium/alumina hydrogenation catalysts. Appl. Catal. A 2005, 282:111-121.
8. 3 catalyst prepared by the sol-gel method. Appl. Catal. A 2001, 217:143-156.
9. Gislason J., Xia W., Sellers H. Selective hydrogenation of acetylene in an ethylene rich flow: results of kinetic simulations. J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106:767-774.
10. Yajun L., Jing Z., Xueru M. Study on the formation of polymers during the hydrogenation of acetylene in ethylene-ethane fractions. Chem. Ind. Eng. Soc. China Am. Inst Chem. Eng. 1982, 82:688-695.
11. Sarkany A., Weiss A., Szilagyi T., Sandor P., Guczi L. Green oil poisoning of a Pd/a1203 acetylene hydrogenation catalyst. Appl. Catal. 1984, 12:373-379.
12. Massoth F. Oxidation of coked silica-alumina catalyst. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. Process Des. Dev. 1967, 6:200-207.
13. Forzatti P., Lietti L. Catalyst deactivation. Catal. Today 1999, 52:165-181.
14. Schulman B. Building a mathematical model for catalyst regeneration in fixed beds. Ind. Eng. Chem. 1963, 55:44-49.
15. Klemm E., Amon B., Redlingshöfer H., Dieterich E., Emig G. Deactivation kinetics in the hydrogenation of nitrobenzene to aniline on the basis of a coke formation kinetics-investigations in an isothermal catalytic wall reactor. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2001, 56:1347-1353.
16. Deemter J.J.V. Heat and mass transport in a fixed catalyst bed during regeneration. Ind. Eng. Chem. 1954, 46:2300-2302.
17. Olson K., Luss D., Amundson N. Regeneration of adiabatic fixed beds. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 1968, 7:96-100.
18. Ozawa Y. Regeneration of coked catalyst in adiabatic fixed beds at lower temperatures. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 1969, 8:378-383.
19. Johnson B.M., Froment G., Watson C. Temperature profiles in packed beds of catalyst during regeneration. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1962, 17:835-848.
20. Gonzalez L., Spencer E. Studies on the numerical solution of a model simulating fixed bed regeneration. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1963, 18:753-766.
21. Sampath B., Ramachandran P., Hughes R. Modelling of non-catalytic gas-solid reactions-II. Transient simulation of a packed bed reactor. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1975, 30:135-143.
22. Westerterp K.R., Fontein H.J., van Beckum F.P.H. Decoking of fixed-bed catalytic reactors. Chem. Eng. Technol. 1988, 11:367-375.
23. Weisz P.B., Goodwin R. Combustion of carbonaceous deposits within porous catalyst particles I. Diffusion-controlled kinetics. J. Catal. 1963, 2:397-404.
24. Weisz P.B., Goodwin R.B. Combustion of carbonaceous deposits within porous catalyst particles: II. Intrinsic burning rate. J. Catal. 1966, 6:227-236.
25. Byrne A., Hughes R., Santamaria-Ramiro J. The influence of initial coke profile and hydrogen content of coke on the regeneration of fixed beds of catalyst. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1985, 40:1507-1515.
26. Borio D.O., Menéndez M., Santamaria J. Simulation and optimization of a fixed bed reactor operating in coking-regeneration cycles. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1992, 31:2699-2707.
27. Kapil S.G., Vivek V.R. Regeneration protocols for fixed bed reactors deactivated by coke. Chem. Eng. Commun. 1999, 171:55-76.
28. Beltramini J., Trimm D. Catalytic reforming of n-heptane on Platinum, Tin and Platinum-Tin supported on alumina. Appl. Catal. A 1987, 31:113-118.
29. 3-Cl bifunctional catalyst. Appl. Catal. A 1983, 5:33-41.
30. 2. J. Catal. 1992, 138:240-254.
31. 2 reaction on supported metal catalysts. Appl. Catal. A 1994, 117:53-74.
32. Ishida M., Wen C. Comparison of kinetic and diffusional models for solid-gas reactions. AIChE J. 1968, 14:311-317.
33. Froment G.F., Bischoff K.B., De Wilde J. Chemical Reactor Analysis and Design 1990, Wiley, New York.
34. 3-catalyst. Appl. Catal. A 2004, 272:187-199.
35. 3 propane dehydrogenation catalyst. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2010, 18:618-625.
36. Sampath B., Hughes R. A review of mathematical models in single particle gas-solid noncatalytic reactions. Chem. Eng. (London) 1973, 278:485-497.
37. Kern C., Jess A. Regeneration of coked catalysts-modelling and verification of coke burn-off in single particles and fixed bed reactors. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2005, 60:4249-4264.
38. Ramachandran P., Rashid M., Hughes R. A model for coke oxidation from catalyst pellets in the initial burning period. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1975, 30:1391-1398.
39. Hashimoto K., Takatani K., Iwasa H., Masuda T. A multiple-reaction model for burning regeneration of coked catalysts. Chem. Eng. J. 1983, 27:177-186.
40. 3 catalyst regeneration in the acetylene hydrogenation reactor of a multi feed cracker. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 198-199:491-502.
41. Domestic Petrochemical Company, Technical bulletin: tail-end acetylene converters, Iran, 2010.
42. Nakasaka Y., Tago T., Konno H., Okabe A., Masudo T. Kinetic study for burning regeneration of coked MFI-type zeolite and numerical modeling for regeneration process in a fixed-bed reactor. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 207-208:368-376.
43. 3-catalyst. Appl. Catal. A 2004, 272:187-199.
44. Alvarez A., Ancheyta J. Transient behavior of residual oil front-end hydrodemetallization in a trickle-bed reactor. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 197:204-214.
45. 3 propane dehydrogenation catalyst. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2010, 18:618-625.
46. Shams K., Najari S. Dynamics of intraparticle desorption and chemical reaction in fixed-beds using inert core spherical particles. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 172:500-506.