Changes in mastectomy rates at a Brazilian public hospital over 20 years (1989 to 2008);Mudanças nas taxas de mastectomia em um hospital público brasileiro ao longo de 20 anos (1989 a 2008)

Sao Paulo Medical Journal

Volumn 130, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 360-366

  Balabram, Débora ^a   Araújo, Fábio Braga ^a   Porto, Simone Souza ^a   Rodrigues, Joyce Soares ^a   Sousa, Atila Silva ^a   Siqueira, Arminda Lucia ^a   Gobbi, Helenice ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF MINAS GERAIS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Brazil; Breast neoplasms; Mastectomy; Mastectomy, segmental; Neoplasm staging

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; AXILLARY LYMPH NODE; BRAZIL; BREAST CANCER; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER SURVIVAL; CHI SQUARE TEST; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTECTOMY; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PUBLIC HOSPITAL; TREND STUDY; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BRAZIL; BREAST NEOPLASMS; EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; FEMALE; HOSPITALS, PUBLIC; HUMANS; MASTECTOMY; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84873043148     PISSN: 15163180     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1516-31802012000600002     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Instituto Nacional de Câncer. Coordenação de Prevenção e Vigilância de Câncer. Estimativas 2008: Incidência de câncer no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: INCA; 2007. Available from: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/estimativa_incidencia_cancer_2008.pdf. Accessed in 2012 (Mar 5).
2. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Instituto Nacional de Câncer. Estimativa 2010: Incidência de Câncer no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: INCA; 2009. Available from: http://iah.iec.pa.gov.br/iah/fulltext/pc/monografias/outros/inca/estimativa_2010_incidencia_cancer.pdf. Accessed in 2012 (Mar 5).
3. Lima-Costa MF, Matos DL. Prevalência e fatores associados à realização da mamografia na faixa etária de 50-69 anos: um estudo baseado na Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios (2003) [Prevalence and factors associated with mammograms in the 50-69-year age group: a study based on the Brazilian National Household Sample Survey (PNAD-2003)]. Cad Saúde Pública. 2007;23(7):1665-1673.
4. Marchi AA, Gurgel MS. Adesão ao rastreamento mamográfico oportunístico em serviços de saúde públicos e privados [Adherence to the opportunistic mammography screening in public and private health systems]. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2010;32(4):191-197.
5. Halsted WS. I. The Results of Operations for the Cure of Cancer of the Breast Performed at the Johns Hopkins Hospital from June, 1889, to January, 1894. Ann Surg. 1894;20(5):497-555.
6. Halsted WS. I. The Results of Radical Operations for the Cure of Carcinoma of the Breast. Ann Surg. 1907;46(1):1-19.
7. Madden JL. Modified radical mastectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1965;121(6):1221-1230.
8. Patey DH. A review of 146 cases of carcinoma of the breast operated on between 1930 and 1943. Br J Cancer. 1967;21(2):260-269.
9. Cotlar AM, Dubose JJ, Rose DM. History of surgery for breast cancer: radical to the sublime. Curr Surg. 2003;60(3):329-337.
10. Veronesi U, Saccozzi R, Del Vecchio M, et al. Comparing radical mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy in patients with small cancers of the breast. N Engl J Med. 1981;305(1):6-11.
11. Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1227-1232.
12. Fisher B, Bauer M, Margolese R, et al. Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1985;312(11):665-673.
13. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1233-1241.
14. Fisher B. Biological and clinical considerations regarding the use of surgery and chemotherapy in the treatment of primary breast cancer. Cancer. 1977;40(1 Suppl):574-587.
15. NIH consensus conference. Treatment of early-stage breast cancer. JAMA. 1991;265(3):391-395.
16. Caldon LJ, Walters SJ, Reed JA, et al. Case-mix fails to explain variation in mastectomy rates: management of screen-detected breast cancer in a UK region 1997-2003. Br J Cancer. 2005;92(1):55-59.
17. Habermann EB, Abbott A, Parsons HM, et al. Are mastectomy rates really increasing in the United States? J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(21):3437-3441.
18. Zorzi M, Puliti D, Vettorazzi M, et al. Mastectomy rates are decreasing in the era of service screening: a population-based study in Italy (1997-2001). Br J Cancer. 2006;95(9):1265-1268.
19. Gomez SL, Lichtensztajn D, Kurian AW, et al. Increasing mastectomy rates for early-stage breast cancer? Population-based trends from California. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(10):e155-e157; author reply e158.
20. Katipamula R, Degnim AC, Hoskin T, et al. Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(25):4082-4088.
21. Damle S, Teal CB, Lenert JJ, et al. Mastectomy and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rates: an institutional review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(5):1356-1363.
22. McCahill LE, Privette AR, Hart MR, James TA. Are mastectomy rates a reasonable quality measure of breast cancer surgery? Am J Surg. 2009;197(2):216-221.
23. McGuire KP, Santillan AA, Kaur P, et al. Are mastectomies on the rise? A 13-year trend analysis of the selection of mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy in 5865 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(10):2682-2690.
24. Suhrke P, Mæhlen J, Schlichting E, et al. Effect of mammography screening on surgical treatment for breast cancer in Norway: comparative analysis of cancer registry data. BMJ. 2011;343:d4692.
25. Adkisson CD, Vallow LA, Kowalchik K, et al. Patient age and preoperative breast MRI in women with breast cancer: biopsy and surgical implications. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(6):1678-1683.
26. Tiezzi DG, Andrade JM, Marana HR, Zola FE, Peria FM. Breast conserving surgery after neoadjuvant therapy for large primary breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34(8):863-867.
27. Morrow M. Limiting breast surgery to the proper minimum. Breast. 2005;14(6):523-526.
28. Ballinger RS, Mayer KF, Lawrence G, Fallowfield L. Patients' decision-making in a UK specialist centre with high mastectomy rates. Breast. 2008;17(6):574-579.
29. Morrow M, White J, Moughan J, et al. Factors predicting the use of breast-conserving therapy in stage I and II breast carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(8):2254-2262.
30. Lee MC, Rogers K, Griffith K, et al. Determinants of breast conservation rates: reasons for mastectomy at a comprehensive cancer center. Breast J. 2009;15(1):34-40.
31. Hiotis K, Ye W, Sposto R, Skinner KA. Predictors of breast conservation therapy: size is not all that matters. Cancer. 2005;103(5):892-899.
32. Reitsamer R, Menzel C, Glueck S, Hitzl W, Peintinger F. Predictors of mastectomy in a certified breast center - the surgeon is an independent risk factor. Breast J. 2008;14(4):324-329.
33. Kirby RM, Basit A, Manimaran N. Patient choice significantly affects mastectomy rates in the treatment of breast cancer. Int Semin Surg Oncol. 2008;5:20.
34. Ess S, Savidan A, Frick H, et al. Geographic variation in breast cancer care in Switzerland. Cancer Epidemiol. 2010;34(2):116-121.
35. Caldon LJ, Collins KA, Wilde DJ, et al. Why do hospital mastectomy rates vary? Differences in the decision-making experiences of women with breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2011;104(10):1551-1557.
36. Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual. 6th ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2002.
37. Kass GV. An exploratory technique for investigating large quantities of categorical data. Applied Statistics. 1980;29(2):119-127. Available from: http://www4.stat.ncsu.edu/~dickey/Analytics/Datamine/Reference%20Papers/kass80.pdf. Accessed in 2012 (Mar 5).
38. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 2000.
39. Pagano M, Gauvreau K. Principles of biostatistics. 2nd ed. Pacific Grove: Duxbury; 2000.
40. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Controle do Câncer de Mama. Documento de Consenso. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Nacional de Câncer; 2004. Available from: http://www.inca.gov.br/publicacoes/Consensointegra.pdf. Accessed in 2012 (Mar 5).
41. Masood S. Why most women with breast cancer still undergo mastectomy. Breast J. 2003;9(2):69-70.
42. Chagpar AB, Studts JL, Scoggins CR, et al. Factors associated with surgical options for breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2006;106(7):1462-1466.
43. Hurria A, Wong FL, Villaluna D, et al. Role of age and health in treatment recommendations for older adults with breast cancer: the perspective of oncologists and primary care providers. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(33):5386-5392.
44. Hurria A, Naeim A, Elkin E, et al. Adjuvant treatment recommendations in older women with breast cancer: a survey of oncologists. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2007;61(3):255-260.
45. Han W, Kim SW, Park IA, et al. Young age: an independent risk factor for disease-free survival in women with operable breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2004;4:82.
46. Bollet MA, Sigal-Zafrani B, Mazeau V, et al. Age remains the first prognostic factor for loco-regional breast cancer recurrence in young (< 40 years) women treated with breast conserving surgery first. Radiother Oncol. 2007;82(3):272-280.
47. Yabroff KR, Kerner JF. Variations in surgery for early-stage breast cancer: what are we measuring? Lancet. 2005;366(9481):188-190.
48. Passman LJ, Farias AM, Tomazelli JG, et al. SISMAMA--implementation of an information system for breast cancer early detection programs in Brazil. Breast. 2011;20 Suppl 2:S35-S39.