Predictors of breast conservation therapy: Size is not all that matters

Cancer

Volumn 103, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 892-899

  Hiotis, Karen ^a   Ye, Wei ^b   Sposto, Richard ^b   Skinner, Kristin A ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Age; Breast carcinoma; Breast conservation; Case volume; Socioeconomic status; Underutilization

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST CONSERVATION THERAPY; CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER REGISTRY; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RACE; SOCIOECONOMICS; SURGEON; TUMOR VOLUME; UNITED STATES; WORKLOAD;

AGE FACTORS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; ETHNIC GROUPS; FEMALE; HOSPITALS; HUMANS; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 13944266001     PISSN: 0008543X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20853     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Halsted WS. The results of radical operations for the cure of carcinoma of the breast. Ann Surg. 1907;46:1-19.
2. Fisher B, Bauer M, Margolese R, et al. Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1985;312: 665-673.
3. Fisher B, Redmond C, Poisson R, et al. Eight year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:822-828.
4. Fisher B, Anderson S, Redmond CK, et al. Reanalysis and results after 12 years of follow-up in a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy with lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1456-1461.
5. Jacobson JA, Danforth DN, Cowan KH, et al. Ten-year results of a comparison of conservation with mastectomy in the treatment of stage I and II breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:907-911.
6. Bland KI, Menck HR, Scott-Conner CE, et al. The national cancer data base 10-year report on the results of a large nonrandomized comparison of breast preservation and modified radical mastectomy. Cancer. 1997;80:163-167.
7. Winchester DJ, Menck HR, Winchester DP. The national cancer data base report on the results of a large nonrandomized comparison of breast preservation and modified radical mastectomy. Cancer. 1997;80:163-167.
8. NIH Consensus Conference. Treatment of early-stage breast cancer. JAMA. 1991;265:391-395.
9. Holland JC, Mastrovito R. Psychologic adaptation to breast cancer. Cancer. 1980;46:1045-1048.
10. Morris J, Royle GT. Offering patients a choice of surgery for early breast cancer: a reduction in anxiety and depression in patients and their husbands. Soc Sci Med. 1988; 26:583-585.
11. Lazovich D, Solomon CC, Thomas DB, et al. Breast conservation therapy in the United States following the 1990 National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on the treatment of patients with early stage invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer. 1999;86:628-637.
12. Lazovich D, White E, Thomas DB, Moe RE. Underutilization of breast conserving surgery and radiation therapy among women with stage I or II breast cancer. JAMA. 1991;266: 3433-3438.
13. Morrow M, Bucci C, Rademaker A. Medical contraindications are not a major factor in the Underutilization of breast conserving therapy. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;186:269-274.
14. Dolan JT, Granchi TS. Low rate of breast conservation surgery in large urban hospital serving the medically indigent. Am J Surg. 1998;176:520-524.
15. Desch CE, Penberthy LT, Hillner BE, et al. A sociodemographic and economic comparison of breast reconstruction, mastectomy, and conservative surgery. Surgery. 1999;125: 441-447.
16. Michalski TA, Nattinger AB. The influence of black race and socioeconomic status on the use of breast-conserving surgery for Medicare beneficiaries. Cancer. 1997;79:314-319.
17. Kotwall CA, Convington DL, Rutledge R, et al. Patient, hospital, and surgeon factors associated with breast conservation surgery. Ann Surg. 1996;224:419-429.
18. Heimbach JK, Biffl WL, Mitchell EL, et al. Breast conservation therapy in affiliated county, university, and private hospitals. Am J Surg. 1999;178:166-169.
19. Legorreta AP, Liu X, Parker RG. Examining the use of breast-conserving treatment for women with breast cancer in a managed care environment. Am J Clin Oncol. 2000;23:438-441.
20. Dolan JT, Granchi TS, Miller CC, et al. Low use of breast conservation surgery in medically indigent populations. Am J Surg. 1999;178: 470-474.
21. Staradub VL, Rademaker AW, Morrow M. Factors influencing outcomes for breast conservation therapy of mammographically detected malignancies. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;196: 518-524.
22. Blair SL, O'Shea KE, Orr RK. Surgeon variability in treating nonpalpable breast cancer: surgical oncology as a value-added specialty. Ann Surg Oncol. 1998;5:28-32.
23. Gilligan MA, Kneusel RT, Hoffmann RG, et al. Persistent differences in sociodemographic determinants of breast conserving treatment despite overall increased adoption. Med Care. 2002;40:181-189.
24. Kotwall C, Covington D, Churchill P, et al. Breast conservation surgery for breast cancer at a regional medical center. Am J Surg. 1998;176:510-514.
25. Albain KS, Green SR, Lichter AS, et al. Influence of patient characteristics, socioeconomic factors, geography, and systemic risk on the use of breast-sparing treatment in women enrolled in adjuvant breast cancer studies: an analysis of two intergroup trials. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14: 3009-3017.
26. Vlastos G, Mirza NQ, Meric F, et al. Breast conservation therapy as a treatment option for the elderly. The M. D. Anderson experience. Cancer. 2001;92:1092-1100.
27. Mendelblatt JS, Hadley J, Kerner JF, et al. Patterns of breast carcinoma treatment in older women: patient preference and clinical and physical influences. Cancer. 2000;89:561-573.
28. Madan AK, Aliabadi-Wahle S, Beech DJ. Age bias: a cause of underutilization of breast conservation treatment. J Cancer Educ. 2001;16:29-32.
29. Osteen R, Steele G Jr., Menck H, Winchester D. Regional differences in surgical management of breast cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 1992;42:39-43.
30. Nattinger AB, Gottlieb MS, Beum J, et al. Geographic variation in the use of breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:1102-1107.
31. SSO Mission Statement. 2002. Available from URL: http:// www.surgonc.org [accessed July 2004].
32. Morrow M, White J, Moughan J, et al. Factors predicting the use of breast-conservation therapy in stage I and II breast carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:2254-2262.
33. Johantgen ME, Coffey RM, Harris R, et al. Treating early-stage breast cancer: hospital characteristics associated with beast-conserving surgery. Am J Public Health. 1995;85:1432-1434.
34. Foster RS Jr., Farwell ME, Costanza MC. Breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer: patterns of care in a geographic region and estimation of potential applicability. Ann Surg Oncol. 1995;2:275-280.
35. McCarthy M, Bore J. Treatment of breast cancer in two teaching hospitals: a comparison with consensus guidelines. Eur J Cancer. 1991;27:579-582.
36. Arnold RE, Frykberg ER, Kilkenny JW, et al. Trends in surgical treatment of breast cancer at an urban teaching hospital: a six-year review. Am Surg. 1998;64:107-111.
37. Naik AM, Joseph K, Harris M, et al. Indigent breast cancer patients among all racial and ethnic groups present with more advanced disease compared with nationally reported data. Am J Surg. 2003;186:400-403.
38. Li BDL, Brown WA, Ampil FL, et al. Patient compliance is critical for equivalent clinical outcomes for breast cancer treated by breast-conservation therapy. Ann Surg. 2000;231: 883-889.