Two-dimensional Potts antiferromagnets with a phase transition at arbitrarily large q

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 87, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Huang, Yuan ^a   Chen, Kun ^a   Deng, Youjin ^a   Jacobsen, Jesper Lykke ^b,c   Kotecký, Roman ^d,e   Salas, Jesús ^f   Sokal, Alan D ^g,h   Swart, Jan M ⁱ  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

^b ECOLE NORMALE SUPÉRIEURE   (France)

^c SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^d CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^e UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID   (Spain)

^g POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION THEORY AND AUTOMATION   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIFERROMAGNETS; GRAPH-THEORETIC METHODS; HIGH-PRECISION; LONG RANGE ORDERS; MONTE CARLO SIMULATION; NUMERICAL DATA; PEIERLS; POTTS ANTIFERROMAGNETS; SUB-LATTICES; TRANSFER MATRIXES; TWO-DIMENSIONAL LATTICES;

ANTIFERROMAGNETIC MATERIALS; GRAPH THEORY; MONTE CARLO METHODS; NUMERICAL METHODS; TRANSFER MATRIX METHOD;

TWO DIMENSIONAL;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MAGNETIC FIELD; PHASE TRANSITION; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PHASE TRANSITION;

EID: 84873034404     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.87.012136     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. R. B. Potts, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. MPCPCO 0305-0041 10.1017/S0305004100027419 48, 106 (1952).
2. F. Y. Wu, Rev. Mod. Phys. RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.54.235 54, 235 (1982);
3. F. Y. Wu, Rev. Mod. Phys. RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.55.315 55, 315 (E) (1983);
4. F. Y. Wu, J. Appl. Phys. JAPIAU 0021-8979 10.1063/1.333682 55, 2421 (1984).
5. R. J. Baxter, Exactly Solved Models in Statistical Mechanics (Academic Press, London, 1982).
6. B. Nienhuis, J. Stat. Phys. JSTPBS 0022-4715 10.1007/BF01009437 34, 731 (1984).
7. P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. Sénéchal, Conformal Field Theory (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997).
8. J. Salas and A. D. Sokal, J. Stat. Phys JSTPBS 0022-4715 10.1023/A:1023002322985 92, 729 (1998), and the references cited there.
9. J. L. Jacobsen, in Polygons, Polyominoes and Polycubes, edited by, A. J. Guttmann, Lecture Notes in Physics No. 775 (Springer, Dordrecht, 2009), Chap. 14.
10. Some exceptions are the constrained square-lattice four-state Potts antiferromagnet, the triangular-lattice antiferromagnetic spin- s Ising model for large enough s [C. Zeng and C. L. Henley, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.14935 55, 14935 (1997)], the diced-lattice three-state Potts antiferromagnet, and the union-jack and bisected-hexagonal four-state Potts antiferromagnets, all of which appear to lie in a noncritical ordered phase at zero temperature.
11. J. K. Burton Jr., and C. L. Henley, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 1361-6447 10.1088/0305-4470/30/24/007 30, 8385 (1997). (Pubitemid 128006724)
12. M. P. M. den Nijs, M. P. Nightingale, and M. Schick, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.26.2490 26, 2490 (1982).
13. J. Kolafa, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 1361-6447 10.1088/0305-4470/17/14/010 17, L777 (1984).
14. D. A. Huse and A. D. Rutenberg, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.45.7536 45, 7536 (1992).
15. J. Kondev and C. L. Henley, Nucl. Phys. B NUPBBO 0550-3213 10.1016/0550-3213(96)00064-8 464, 540 (1996). (Pubitemid 126165627)
16. C. Moore and M. E. J. Newman, J. Stat. Phys. JSTPBS 0022-4715 10.1023/A:1018638624854 99, 629 (2000).
17. J. Kondev and C. L. Henley, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.52.6628 52, 6628 (1995);
18. J. L. Jacobsen and J. Kondev, Nucl. Phys. B NUPBBO 0550-3213 10.1016/S0550-3213(98)00571-9 532, 635 (1998).
19. c = 4.
20. R. Kotecký, J. Salas, and A. D. Sokal, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.030601 101, 030601 (2008).
21. R. Kotecký, A. D. Sokal, and J. M. Swart, arXiv: 1205.4472.
22. J. L. Jacobsen and J. Salas, (unpublished).
23. Y. Deng, Y. Huang, J. L. Jacobsen, J. Salas, and A. D. Sokal, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.150601 107, 150601 (2011).
24. J. L. Jacobsen and C. R. Scullard, J. Phys. A 1751-8113 10.1088/1751-8113/45/49/494003 45, 494003 (2012);
25. C. R. Scullard and J. L. Jacobsen, J. Phys. A 1751-8113 10.1088/1751-8113/45/49/494004 45, 494004 (2012);
26. J. L. Jacobsen and C. R. Scullard, J. Phys. A (to be published).
27. Q. N. Chen, M. P. Qin, J. Chen, Z. C. Wei, H. H. Zhao, B. Normand, and T. Xiang, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.165701 107, 165701 (2011).
28. This is a special case of the Potts reduction formulas for two-rooted subgraphs: See A. D. Sokal, in Surveys in Combinatorics, 2005, edited by, B. S. Webb, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2005), Sec. 4.6.
29. 1 and used to show the long-range order for q = 3 and d ≥ 3.
30. V. Beffara and H. Duminil-Copin, Probab. Th. Rel. Fields PTRFEU 0178-8051 10.1007/s00440-011-0353-8 153, 511 (2012).
31. ) = x: See R. M. Corless, Adv. Comput. Math. ACMHEX 1019-7168 10.1007/BF02124750 5, 329 (1996).
32. A more complicated example with this property was given in the last paragraph of.
33. R. Kotecký, A. D. Sokal, and J. M. Swart (unpublished).
34. J. Fröhlich and E. H. Lieb, Commun. Math. Phys. CMPHAY 0010-3616 10.1007/BF01612891 60, 233 (1978);
35. J. Fröhlich, R. Israel, E. H. Lieb, and B. Simon, Commun. Math. Phys. CMPHAY 0010-3616 10.1007/BF01940327 62, 1 (1978);
36. M. Biskup, in Methods of Contemporary Mathematical Statistical Physics, edited by, R. Kotecký, (Springer, Berlin, 2009).
37. □, c on bases up to 7 × 7 (294 edges). These results were made possible by an improvement of the transfer-matrix method of [J. L. Jacobsen (unpublished)].
38. The algorithm chooses randomly two of the q colors and then simulates the induced mixed ferromagnetic-antiferromagnetic (F-AF) Ising model by the Swendsen-Wang algorithm [R. H. Swendsen and J.-S. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.86 58, 86 (1987)].
39. This is a slight extension of the WSK algorithm [J.-S. Wang, R. H. Swendsen, and R. Kotecký, Phys. Rev. Lett. 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett. 63.109 63, 109 (1989);
40. J.-S. Wang, R. H. Swendsen, and R. Kotecký, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.42.2465 42, 2465 (1990)] to permit mixed F-AF couplings.
41. This monotonicity would be a rigorous theorem if the Griffiths' first inequality of S. J. Ferreira and A. D. Sokal, J. Stat. Phys. JSTPBS 0022-4715 10.1023/A:1004599121565 96, 461 (1999), Appendix A could be extended to a Griffiths' second inequality.
42. C. Borgs, R. Kotecký, and S. Miracle-Solé, J. Stat. Phys. JSTPBS 0022-4715 10.1007/BF01017971 62, 529 (1991).
43. H. W. J. Blöte and H. J. Hilhorst, J. Phys. A 1361-6447 10.1088/0305-4470/15/11/011 15, L631 (1982);
44. B. Nienhuis, H. J. Hilhorst, and H. W. J. Blöte, J. Phys. A 1361-6447 10.1088/0305-4470/17/18/025 17, 3559 (1984).