Investigating the structure of procedural texts for answering how- to questions

Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 46-51

  Delpech, Estelle ^a   Saint Dizier, Patrick ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FACTOID QUESTIONS;

TEXT PROCESSING;

EID: 84872974411     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Adam, J. M., Types de Textes ou genres de Discours? Comment Classer les Textes qui Disent De et Comment Faire, Lanugages, 141, pp. 10-27, 2001.
2. Aouladomar, F., Saint-Dizier, P., An Exploration of the Diversity of Natural Argumentation in Instructional Texts, 5th International Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument, IJCAI, Edinburgh, 2005.
3. Delin, J., Hartley, A., Paris, C., Scott, D., Van der Linden, K., Expressing Procedural Relationships in Multilingual Instructions, Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Natural Language Generation, pp. 61-70, Maine, USA, 1994.
4. Delpech, E., Murguia, E., Saint-Dizier, P., A Two-Level Strategy for Parsing Procedural Texts, VSST07, Mar-rakech, October 2007.
5. Gardent, C., Discourse tree adjoining grammars, report nb. 89, Univ. Saarlandes, Saarbrucken, 1997.
6. Greimas, A., La Soupe au Pistou ou la Conservation d'un Objet de Valeur, in Du sens II, Seuil, Paris, 1983.
7. Kosseim, L., Lapalme, G., Choosing Rhetorical Structures to Plan Instructional Texts, Computational Intelligence, Blackwell, Boston, 2000.
8. Luc, C., Mojahid, M., Virbel, J., Garcia-Debanc, C., Pery-Woodley, M.-P., A Linguistic Approach to Some Parameters of Layout: A study of enumerations, In R. Power and D. Scott (Eds.), Using Layout for the Generation, Understanding or Retrieval of Documents, AAAI 1999 Fall Symposium, pp. 20-29, 1999.
9. De Rijke, M., Question Answering: What's Next?, the Sixth International Workshop on Computational Semantics, Tilburg, 2005.
10. Maybury, M., New Directions in Question Answering, The MIT Press, Menlo Park, 2004.
11. Moldovan, D., Harabagiu, S., Pasca, M., Milhacea, R., Goodrum, R., Grju, R., Rus, V., The Structure and Performance of an Open-Domain Question Answering System, Proceedings of the 38th Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), Hong Kong, 2000.
12. Mortara Garavelli, B., Tipologia dei Testi, in G. Hodus et al.: lexicon der romanistischen Linguistik, vol. IV, Tubingen, Niemeyer, 1988.
13. Rosner, D., Stede, M., Customizing RST for the Automatic Production of Technical Manuals, in R. Dale, E. Hovy, D. Rosner and O. Stock eds., Aspects of Automated Natural Language Generation, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 199-214, Springler-Verlag, 1992.
14. Takechi, M., Tokunaga, T., Matsumoto, Y., Tanaka, H., Feature Selection in Categorizing Procedural Expressions, The Sixth International Workshop on Information Retrieval with Asian Languages (IRAL2003), pp. 49-56, 2003.
15. Van der Linden, K., Speaking of Actions Choosing Rhetorical Status and Grammatical Form in Instructional Text Generation Thesis, University of Colorado, 1993.
16. Webber, B., D-LTAG: extending lexicalized TAGs to Discourse, Cognitive Science 28, pp. 751-779, Elsevier, 2004.