Computational and experimental studies of an orthopedic implant: MRI-related heating at 1.5-T/64-MHz and 3-T/128-MHz

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 491-497

  Liu, Yan ^a   Chen, Ji ^a   Shellock, Frank G ^b   Kainz, Wolfgang ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c CENTER FOR DEVICES AND RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

electromagnetic modeling; heating; medical implants; MRI safety

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ENERGY; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; EXPERIMENTAL TEST; HEATING; IMAGING SYSTEM; LINEAR SYSTEM; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; SIMULATION; SPECTRAL SENSITIVITY; TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT; TEMPERATURE SENSITIVITY;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; ENERGY TRANSFER; HOT TEMPERATURE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; METALS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; THERMOGRAPHY;

EID: 84872949134     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23764     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Shellock FG,. Reference manual for magnetic resonance safety, implants and devices: 2012 edition. Los Angeles: Biomedical Research Publishing; 2012.
2. Woods TO,. Standards for medical devices in MRI: present and future. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 26: 1186-1189. (Pubitemid 350058284)
3. ASTM. Standard F2182-11a, 2011, standard test method for measurement of radio frequency induced heating on or near passive implants during magnetic resonance imaging. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2011, DOI: 10.1520/F2182-11A, www.astm.org
4. SEMCAD X. Reference manual for the SEMCAD simulation platform for electromagnetic compatibility, antenna design and dosimetry. SPEAG-Schmid & Partner Engineering.
5. Neufeld E, Kuhn S, Szekely G, Kuster N,. Measurement, simulation, and uncertainty during MRI. Phys Med Biol 2009; 54: 4151-4169.
6. Chen J, Feng Z, Jin JM,. Numerical simulation of SAR and B1-field inhomogeneity of shielded RF coils loaded with the human head. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1998; 45: 650-659. (Pubitemid 28212778)
7. Jin J,. Electromagnetic analysis and design in magnetic resonance imaging. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1998.
8. Angelone LM, Ahveninen J, Belliveau JW, Bonmassar G,. Analysis of the role of lead resistivity in specific absorption rate for deep brain stimulator leads at 3T MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2010; 29: 1029-1038.
9. Powell J, Papadaki A, Hand J, Hart A, McRobbie D,. Numerical simulation of SAR induced around Co-Cr-Mo hip prostheses in situ exposed to RF fields associated with 1.5- and 3-T MRI body coils. Magn Reson Med 2011 [Epub ahead of print].
10. Oh S, Webb AG, Neuberger T, Park B, Collins CM,. Experimental and numerical assessment of MRI-induced temperature change and SAR distributions in phantoms and in vivo. Magn Reson Med 2010; 63: 218-223.
11. Mattei E, Triventi M, Calcagnini G, et al. Complexity of MRI induced heating on metallic leads: experimental measurements of 374 configurations. Biomed Eng Online 2008; 7: 11.