Feasibility study of industrial projects using Simos procedure

Journal of Civil Engineering and Management

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 59-68

  Marzouk, Mohamed ^a   Amer, Omar ^a   El Said, Moheeb ^a  

^a CAIRO UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

Author keywords

feasibility study; industrial projects; multi criteria decision making; ranking techniques; sensitivity analysis; Simos procedure; Weighted Sum Model

Indexed keywords

FEASIBILITY STUDIES; INDUSTRIAL PROJECTS; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING; RANKING TECHNIQUE; SIMOS PROCEDURE; WEIGHTED-SUM;

INDUSTRY; PLANNING; PRIVATIZATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 84872929350     PISSN: 13923730     EISSN: 18223605     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3846/13923730.2012.734855     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Amer, O. M. 2010. A multi-criteria decision making approach for selecting industrial projects. MSc Thesis. Construction Engineering and Management Division, Structural Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University, Egypt.
2. Changshan, W. 2007. Remote sensing applications in urban socioeconomic analysis, in V. Mesev (Ed.). Integration of GIS and Remote Sensing. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., NY, US, 149-172.
3. Dozzi, S. P.; AbouRizk, S. M.; Schroeder, S. L. 1996. Utility-theory model for bid markup decisions, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management ASCE 122(2): 119-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364 (1996)122:2(119
4. Figueira, J.; Roy, B. 2002. Determining the weights of criteria in the ELECTRE type methods with a revised Simos' procedure, European Journal of Operational Research 139(1-2): 317-326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01) 00370-8 (Pubitemid 34201242)
5. Fishburn, P. C. 1967. Additive utilities with incomplete product sets: application to priorities and assignments, Operations Research 15: 537-542. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.15.3.537
6. Marzouk, M.; Moselhi, O. 2003. A decision support tool for construction bidding, Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management 3(2): 111-124.
7. Marzouk, M. 2008a. SIR-VE: A generic tool for value engineering, in Proc. of the 5th International Engineering and Construction Conference (IECC'5), 27-29 August, 2008, Irvine, California, USA, 663-672.
8. Marzouk, M. 2008b. A superiority and inferiority ranking model for contractor selection, Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management 8(4): 250-268.
9. Mostafavi, A.; Karamouz, M. 2010. Selecting appropriate project delivery system: a fuzzy approach with risk analysis, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management ASCE 136(8): 923-930. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943- 7862.0000190
10. Roussat, N.; Dujet, C.; Méhu, J. 2009. Choosing a sustainable demolition waste management strategy using multicriteria decision analysis, Waste Management 29(1): 12-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2008.04.010
11. Tam, C. M.; Tong, T. K. L.; Wong, Y. W. 2004. Selection of concrete pump using the superiority and inferiority ranking method, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management ASCE 130(6): 827-834. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/ (ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130: 6(827 (Pubitemid 40265315)
12. Triantaphyllou, E.; Sánchez, A. 1997. A sensitivity analysis approach for some deterministic multi-criteria decision making methods, Decision Sciences 28(1): 151-194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01306.x (Pubitemid 127070910)
13. Ulubeyli, S.; Kazaz, A. 2009. A multiple criteria decision making approach to the selection of concrete pumps, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 15(4): 369-376. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1392-3730.2009.15.369-376
14. UNDP. 2010. Fighting climate change: human solidarity in a divided world. The 2007/2008 Human Development Report. United Nations Development Programme [cited 10 April 2010]. Available from Internet: http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/ HDR-20072008-EN-Complete.pdf
15. Zhang, C.; Zayed, T.; Hammad, A. 2008. Resource management of bridge deck rehabilitation: Jacques Cartier bridge case study, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management ASCE 134(5): 311-319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/ (ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:5(311 (Pubitemid 351578585)