Pain intensity and Patients' acceptance of surgical complication risks with lumbar fusion

Spine

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 140-147

  Bono, Christopher M ^a   Harris, Mitchel B ^a   Warholic, Natalie ^a   Katz, Jeffrey N ^a   Carreras, Edward ^a   White, Andrew ^a   Schmitz, Miguel ^a   Wood, Kirkham B ^a   Losina, Elena ^a  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

acceptance; complications; fusion; lumbar; pain; risk tolerance; surgery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DISEASE DURATION; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; FRACTURE NONUNION; HUMAN; LEG PAIN; LOW BACK PAIN; LUMBAR SPINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL HISTORY; NERVE INJURY; PAIN THRESHOLD; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RACE DIFFERENCE; SEX DIFFERENCE; SPINE FUSION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL INFECTION; SURGICAL RISK; SYMPTOM;

ADULT; BACK PAIN; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEG; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SPINAL FUSION;

EID: 84872911871     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318279b648     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Phelan EA, Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, et al. Helping patients decide about back surgery: A randomized trial of an interactive video program. Spine 2001; 26: 206-11.
2. Bederman SS, Mahomed NN, Kreder HJ, et al. In the eye of the beholder: preferences of patients, family physicians, and surgeons for lumbar spinal surgery. Spine 2010; 35: 103-15.
3. Barrett PH, Beck A, Schmid K, et al. Treatment decisions about lumbar herniated disc in a shared decision-making program. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 2002; 28: 211-9.
4. Lurie JD, Weinstein JN. Shared decision-making and the orthopedic work force. Clin Orthop Rel Res 2001; 385: 65-75.
5. Weiner BK. Matching patient-specifi c expectations with physicianspecifi c outcomes: Towards transparency in treatment decisionmaking and consent. Med Hypotheses 2007; 68: 1287-91. (Pubitemid 46509694)
6. Weinstein JN. The missing piece: Embracing shared decision making to reform health care. Spine 2000; 25: 1-4. (Pubitemid 30035974)
7. Borenstein DG, O'Mara JW, Boden SD, et al. The value of magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine to predict low-back pain in asymptomatic subjects: A seven-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83-A: 1306-11. (Pubitemid 32852022)
8. Boden SD, Davis DO, Dina TS, et al. Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990; 72: 403-8. (Pubitemid 20151924)
9. Faucett J, Gordon N, Levine J. Differences in postoperative pain severity among four ethnic groups. J Pain Symptom Manage 1994; 9: 383-9. (Pubitemid 24278156)
10. Entwistle V, Williams B, Skea Z, et al. Which surgical decision should patients participate in and how? Refl ection on women's recollections of discussion about variants of hysterectomy. Soc Sci Med 2006; 62: 499-509. (Pubitemid 41735436)
11. Entwistle VA, Sheldon TA, Sowden A, et al. Evidence-informed patient choice. Practical issues of involving patients in decision about health care technologies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1998; 14: 212-25. (Pubitemid 28237796)
12. Mazur DJ, Hickman DH. Patients' preferences for risk disclosure and role in decision making for invasive medical procedures. J Gen Intern Med 1997; 12: 114-7. (Pubitemid 27131233)
13. Mazur DJ, Merz JF. Older patients' willingness to trade off urologic adverse outcomes for a better chance at fi ve-year survival in the clinical setting of prostate cancer. J Am Geriatr 1995; 43: 979-84.
14. Thistlewaite J, Evans R, Tie RN. Shared decision making and decision aids - a literature review. Aust Fam Physician 2006; 35: 537-40.
15. Weinstein JN, Clay K, Morgan TS. Informed patient choice: patient-centered valuing of surgical risks and benefi ts. Health Aff (Millwood) 2007; 26: 726-30.
16. Kiss CG, Richter-Muesksch S, Stifter E, et al. Informed consent and decision making by cataract patients. Arch Ophthalmol 2004; 122: 94-8. (Pubitemid 38063612)
17. Borrero S, Nikolajski C, Rodriguez KL, et al. " Everything I know I learned from my mother.*Or not": perspectives of African-American and white women on decisions about tubal sterilization. J Gen Intern Med 2009; 24: 312-9.
18. Jones AC, Kwoh CK, Groenveld PW, et al. Investigating racial differences in coping with chronic osteoarthritis pain. J Cross Cult Gerontol 2008; 23: 339-47.
19. Ang DC, Ibrahim SA, Burant CJ, et al. Ethnic differences in the perception of prayer and consideration of joint arthroplasty. Med Care 2002; 40: 471-6.
20. Wang JC, Bohlman HH, Riew KD. Dural tears secondary to operations on the lumbar spine. Management and results after a twoyear-minimum follow-up of eighty-eight patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998; 80: 1728-32. (Pubitemid 29013805)