Enhanced enzymatic cellulose degradation by cellobiohydrolases via product removal

Biotechnology Letters

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 205-212

  Gavlighi, Hassan Ahmadi ^a,b   Meyer, Anne S ^a   Mikkelsen, J Dalgaard ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b TARBIAT MODARES UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Cellobiohydrolase I (CBHI); Cellobiohydrolase II (CBHII); Endoglucanase; Membrane reactor; Product removal

Indexed keywords

BIOREACTORS; CELLULOSE; MICROFILTRATION;

CELLOBIOHYDROLASE I; CELLOBIOHYDROLASES; CELLULOSE HYDROLYSIS; ENDOGLUCANASES; MEMBRANE FILTRATIONS; MEMBRANE REACTOR; OPTIMAL REACTION CONDITION; SUBSTRATE CONVERSION;

ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS;

ASPERGILLUS; EMERICELLA; EMERICELLA NIDULANS; GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM; PICHIA PASTORIS;

EID: 84872817844     PISSN: 01415492     EISSN: 15736776     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10529-012-1067-4     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Andrić P, Meyer AS, Jensen PA, Dam-Johansen K (2010a) Reactor design for minimizing product inhibition during enzymatic lignocellulose hydrolysis: I. Significance and mechanism of cellobiose and glucose inhibition on cellulolytic enzymes. Biotechnol Adv 28: 308-324.
2. Andrić P, Meyer AS, Jensen PA, Dam-Johansen K (2010b) Reactor design for minimizing product inhibition during enzymatic lignocellulose hydrolysis: II. Quantification of inhibition and suitability of membrane reactors. Biotechnol Adv 28: 407-425.
3. Bauer S, Vasu P, Persson S, Mort AJ, Somerville CR (2006) Development and application of a suite of polysaccharide-degrading enzymes for analyzing plant cell walls. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 11417-11422.
4. Bélafi-Bakó K, Koutinas A, Nemestóthy N, Gubicza L, Webb C (2006) Continuous enzymatic cellulose hydrolysis in a tubular membrane bioreactor. Enzyme Microb Technol 38: 155-161.
5. Bhat MK, Bhat S (1997) Cellulose degrading enzymes and their potential industrial applications. Biotechnol Adv 15: 583-620.
6. Caminal G, Lopezsantin J, Sola C (1985) Kinetic modeling of the enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng 27: 1282-1290.
7. Converse AO, Matsuno R, Tanaka M, Taniguchi M (1988) A model of enzyme adsorption and hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose with slow deactivation of the adsorbed enzyme. Biotechnol Bioeng 32: 38-45.
8. Coutinho PM, Andersen MR, Kolenova K, vanKuyk PA et al (2009) Post-genomic insights into the plant polysaccharide degradation potential of Aspergillus nidulans and comparison to Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus oryzae. Fungal Genet Biol 46: S161-S169.
9. Eriksson T, Karlsson J, Tjerneld F (2002) A model explaining declining rate in hydrolysis of lignocellulose substrates with cellobiohydrolase I (Cel7A) and endoglucanase I (Cel7B) of Trichoderma reesei. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 101: 41-60.
10. Gan Q, Allen SJ, Taylor G (2002) Design and operation of an integrated membrane reactor for enzymatic cellulose hydrolysis. Biochem Eng J 12: 223-229.
11. Gan Q, Allen SJ, Taylor G (2003) Kinetic dynamics in heterogeneous enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: an overview, an experimental study and mathematical modelling. Process Biochem 38: 1003-1018.
12. Gusakov AV, Sinitsyn AP (1992) A theoretical analysis of cellulase product inhibition: effect of cellulase binding constant, enzyme/substrate ratio, and beta-glucosidase activity on the inhibition pattern. Biotechnol Bioeng 40: 663-671.
13. Igarashi K, Uchihashi T, Koivula A, Wada M, Kimura S, Okamoto T, Penttilä M, Ando T, Samejima M (2011) Traffic jams reduce hydrolytic efficiency of cellulase on cellulose surface. Science 333: 1279-1282.
14. Klei HE, Sundstrom DW, Coughlin RW, Ziolkowski K (1981) Hollow-fiber enzyme reactors in cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng Symp 11: 593-601.
15. Lever M (1977) Carbohydrate determination with 4-hydroxybenzoic acid hydrazide (PAHBAH): effect of bismuth on the reaction. Anal Biochem 81: 21-27.
16. Pérez J, Munoz-Dorado J, De la Rubia T, Martinez J (2002) Biodegradation and biological treatments of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin: an overview. Int Microbiol 5: 53-63.
17. Quinlan RJ, Sweeney MD, Lo Leggio L, Otten H et al (2011) Insights into the oxidative degradation of cellulose by a copper metalloenzyme that exploits biomass components. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 15079-15084.
18. Rosgaard L, Pedersen S, Langston J, Akerhielm D, Cherry JR, Meyer AS (2007) Evaluation of minimal Trichoderma reesei cellulase mixtures on differently pretreated barley straw substrates. Biotechnol Prog 23: 1270-1276.
19. Ryu DDY, Mandels M (1980) Cellulases: biosynthesis and applications. Enzyme Microb Technol 2: 91-102.
20. Teeri TT, Koivula A, Linder M, Reinikainen T, Ruohonen L, Srisodsuk M, Claeyssens M, Alwyn Jones T (1995) Modes of action of two Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolases. In: Steffen BS, Petersen B, Sven P (eds) Progress in biotechnology, vol 10. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 211-224.
21. van Tilbeurgh H, Claeyssens M, de Bruyne CK (1982) The use of 4-methylumbelliferyl and other chromophoric glycosides in the study of cellulolytic enzymes. FEBS Lett 149: 152-156.
22. van Tilbeurgh H, Pettersson G, Bhikabhai R, De Boeck H, Claeyssens M (1985) Studies of the cellulolytic system of Trichoderma reesei QM 9414. Eur J Biochem 148: 329-334.
23. Zugenmaier P (2008) Crystalline cellulose and derivatives: characterization and structures. Springer, Verlag.