The design of link charts in criminal intelligence analysis: Beyond the mastery of tools;La conception de schémas relationnels en analyse criminelle: Au-delà de la maîtrise des outils

Revue Internationale de Criminologie et de Police Technique et Scientifique

Volumn 65, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 345-362

  Rossy, Quentin ^a   Ribaux, Olivier ^a  

^a Institut de Police Scientifique   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Criminal Intelligence Analysis; Criminal investigation; Link Chart; Visualisation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84872734202     PISSN: 14244683     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Atkin, H. 2000. «Criminal intelligence analysis: a scientific perspective». IALEIA Journal 13 (1): 1-15.
2. Bertin, J. 2005. Sémiologie graphique: les diagrammes-les réseaux-les cartes. 4e éd. Paris: Les ré-impressions des Editions de l'Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales.
3. Bresciani, S., et M. Eppler. 2008. The risks of visualization. A classification of disadvantages associated with graphic representations of information. ICA Working Paper 1/2008. Lugano, Switzerland: University of Lugano.
4. Chen, P. P.-S. 1976. The entity-relationship model: toward a unified view of data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 1: 9-36.
5. Feigenson, N., et R. K. Sherwin. 2007. «Thinking beyond the shown: implicit inferences in evidence and argument». Law, Probability & Risk 6 (1-4): 295-310.
6. Harper, W. R., et D. H. Harris. 1975. «The application of link analysis to police intelligence». Human Factors 17 (2): 157-164.
7. Harris D. H. 2011. «Critical Thinking Training for Intelligence Analysis». IALEIA Journal 20 (1): 76-87.
8. Heuer R. J. 1999. Psychology of intelligence analysis. 1er éd. Washington, DC: Central Intelligence Agency (Center for the Study of Intelligence).
9. Ianni, F. A.J. and E. Reuss Ianni. 1990. «Network Analysis» in Criminal Intelligence Analysis.
10. P. P. Andrews, Jr. et M. B. Peterson, eds. Loomis, CA: Palmer Enterprises: 67-84.
11. Innes, M., N. Fielding, et N. Cope. 2005. «The appliance of science? The theory and practice of crime intelligence analysis». British Journal of Criminology 45: 39-57.
12. Klerks, P. 2001. «The network paradigm applied to criminal organizations: theoretical nitpicking or a relevant doctrine for investigators? Recent developments in the Netherlands». Connections 24 (3): 53-65.
13. Mackinlay, J. 1986. Automating the design of graphical presentations of relational information. Dans Readings in intelligent user interfaces, éd par. M. T. Maybury et W. Wahlster, 5:177-193. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
14. Peterson M. B. 1998. Joining the debate: product vs. process. IALEIA Journal 11 (1): 1-13.
15. Reed, R. N., et P. Kocura. 2005. Conceptual graph based criminal intelligence analysis. Dans Common semantics for sharing knowledge: contributions to ICCS 2005 13th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, éd par. F. Dau et M.-L. Mugnier, 146-159. ICCS 2005. Kassel, Germany: Kassel university press.
16. Schroeder, J., J. Xu, H. Chen, et M. Chau. 2007. «Automated criminal link analysis based on domain knowledge». Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58 (6): 842-855.
17. Sparrow, M. K. 1991. «The application of network analysis to criminal intelligence: an assessment of the prospects». Social networks 13 (3): 251-274.
18. Stasko, J., C. Görg, et Z. Liu. 2008. «Jigsaw: supporting investigative analysis through interactive visualization». Information Visualization 7 (2): 118-132.
19. Tufte, E. R. 2001. The visual display of quantitative information. 2e éd. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
20. Xu, J. et Chen, H. 2005. Criminal network analysis and visualization. Communications of the ACM 48 (6): 100-107.