'The appliance of science?': The theory and practice of crime intelligence analysis

British Journal of Criminology

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 39-57

  Innes, Martin ^a   Fielding, Nigel ^a   Cope, Nina ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

^b METROPOLITAN POLICE SERVICE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 12344290713     PISSN: 00070955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bjc/azh053     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. ALTHEIDE, D. (1996), Qualitative Media Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. AUDIT COMMISSION (1993), Helping With Enquiries: Tackling Crime Effectively. London: HMSO.
3. BRAITHWAITE, R. (2000), 'Assessment and Analysis: Building an Accurate Picture', in H. Shukman, ed., Agents for Change: Intelligence Services in the 21st Century. London: St Ermin's Press.
4. BERKOWITZ, B. and GOODMAN, A. (2001), Best Truth: Intelligence Services in the Information Age. New York: Yale University Press.
5. BRODEUR, J.-P. (1983), 'High Policing and Low Policing: Remarks about the Policing of Political Activities', Social Problems, 30: 507-20.
6. COLE, S. (2001), Suspect Identities: A History of Fingerprinting and Criminal Identification. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7. COLES, N. (2001), 'It's Not What You Know - It's Who You Know that Counts: Analysing Serious Crime Groups as Social Networks', British Journal of Criminology, 41: 580-94.
8. DINTINO, J. and MARTENS, F. (1983), Police Intelligence Systems in Crime Control Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
9. ERICSON, R. and SHEARING, C. (1986), The Scientificaion of Police Work', in G. Bohme and N. Stehr, eds, The Knowledge Society: The Growing Impact of Scientific Knowledge on Social Relations. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
10. ERICSON, R. and HAGGERTY, K. (1997), Policing the Risk Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. FIELDING, N. (1995), Community Policing. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
12. FOUCAULT, M. (1977), Discipline and Punish. London: Penguin.
13. FOUCAULT, M. (1988), 'Technologies of the self, in L. Martin, H. Gutman and P. Hutton, eds, Technologies of the Self: An Interview with Michel Foucault. Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press.
14. GARFINKEL, H., LYNCH, M. and LIVINGSTONE, E. (1981), 'The Work of a Discovering Science Construed with Materials from the Optically Discovered Pulsar', Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11: 131-58.
15. GIDDENS, A. (1984), The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
16. GILL, P. (2000), Rounding Up the Usual Suspects. Aldershot: Ashgate.
17. GODFREY, E. Drexel and HARRIS, D. R. (1971), Basic Elements of Intelligence: A Manual of Theory, Structure and Procedures for Use by Law Enforcement Agencies against Organized Crime. Technical Assistance Division, Office of Criminal Justice assistance, LEAA. US Government Printing Office.
18. GRANOVETTER, M. (1973), The Strength of Weak Ties', American Journal of Sociology, 78: 1287-303.
19. GRANOVETTER, M. (1982), The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited', in P. Marsden and N. Lin, eds, Social Structure and Network Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
20. HACKING, I. (1990), The Taming of Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. HACKING, I. (2002), 'Inaugral Lecture: Chair of Philosophy and History of Scientific Concepts, at the College de France, 16 January 2001', Economy and Society, 31: 1-14.
22. HEIDEGGER, M. (1977), The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
23. HOBBS, D. (1998), 'Going Down the Glocal: The Local Context of Organized Crime', The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 37: 407-22.
24. IANNI, F. and REUSS-IANNI, E. (1990), 'Network Analysis', in P. Andrews and M. Peterson, eds, Criminal Intelligence Analysis. Loomis, CA: Palmer Enterprises.
25. INNES, M. (2003), Investigating Murder: Detective Work and the Police Response to Criminal Homicide. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
26. JASANOF, S. (1997), Science at the Bar: Science and Technology in American Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27. JOHNSTON, L. (2000), Policing Britain: Risk, Security and Governance. London: Longman.
28. KELLY, R. (1990), 'The Development of Inferences in the Assessment of Intelligence Data', in P. Andrews and M. Peterson, eds, Criminal Intelligence Analysis. Loomis, CA: Palmer Enterprises.
29. KNORR-CETINA, K. (1980), The Manufacture of Knowledge. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
30. KNORR-CETINA, K. (1999), Epistemic Cultures. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
31. LATOUR, B. (1990), 'Drawing things together', in M. Lynch and S. Woolgar, eds, Representation in Scientific Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. LYNCH, M. (1990), 'The Externalised Retina: Selection Mathematization in the Visual Documentation of Objects in the Life Sciences', in M. Lynch and S. Woolgar, eds, Representation in Scientific Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. LYNCH, M. (1993), Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. LYNCH, M. (1998), The Discursive Production of Uncertainty: The O.J. Simpson 'Dream Team' and the Sociology of Knowledge Machine', Social Studies of Science, 28: 829-68.
35. LYNCH, M. and WOOLGAR, S. (1990), 'Introduction: Sociological Orientations to Representational Practice in Science', in M. Lynch and S. Woolgar, eds, Representation in Scientific Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. MAGUIRE, M. (2000), 'Policing by Risks and Targets: Some Dimensions and Implications of Intelligence-Led Crime Control', Policing and Society, 9: 315-36.
37. MANNING, P. (1980), The Narc's Game. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
38. MANNING, P. (2001), 'Technology's Ways: Information Technology, Crime Analysis and the Rationalizing of Policing', Criminal Justice, 1: 83-103.
39. MARX, G. (1988), Undercover: Police Surveillance in America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
40. MATZA, D. (1969), Becoming Deviant. New York: Prentice-Hall.
41. NATIONAL CRIMINAL INTELLIGENCE SERVICE (2000), The National Intelligence Model London: NCIS Corporate Communications.
42. PETERSON, M. (1994), Applications in Criminal Analysis: A Sourcebook, Westport: Greenwood Press.
43. RATCLIFFE, J. and MCCULLAGH, M. (2001), 'Chasing Ghosts? Police Perception of High Crime Areas', The British Journal of Criminology 41: 330-41.
44. REINER, R. (1992), The Politics of the Police, 2nd edn. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
45. ROSE, N. (1998), Inventing Our Selves: Psychology, Power and Personhood, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. ROSZACK, T. (1994), The Cult of Information, 2nd edn. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
47. RUGGIERO, V. (2000), Crime and Markets: Essays in Anti-Criminology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
48. SCOTT, J. (1991), Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. London: Sage.
49. SEELY-BROWN, J. and DUGUID, P. (2001), The Social Life of Information. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Business School Press.
50. SHERMAN, L. (1990), 'Attacking Crime: Policing and Crime Control' in M. Tonry and N. Morris, eds, Modern Policing. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
51. SPARROW, M. (1991), The Application of Network Analysis to Criminal Intelligence', Social Networks, 13: 251-74.
52. TAYLOR, I. (1999), Crime in Context: A Critical Criminology of Market Societies. Cambridge: Polity.
53. WEICK, K. (1995), Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.