A Technique to Increase Accessibility to Late-Stage Chick Embryos for In Ovo Manipulations

Developmental Dynamics

Volumn 242, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 148-154

  Spurlin, James ^a   Lwigale, Peter ^a  

^a RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cell injections; Dissection; Extraembryonic membranes; In ovo; Late stage chick embryo

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL INTERACTION; CHICK EMBRYO; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE; DISSECTION; EGG; EMBRYO; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EMBRYO MEMBRANE; FERTILIZATION; FETUS MEMBRANE; FIBROBLAST; GENETIC MANIPULATION; IN VIVO STUDY; NONHUMAN; ORGANOGENESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEM CELL; TISSUE REGENERATION;

ANIMALS; CHICK EMBRYO; DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; EXTRAEMBRYONIC MEMBRANES; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MICRODISSECTION; MICROINJECTIONS;

AVES; SPONDIAS PURPUREA;

EID: 84872715443     PISSN: 10588388     EISSN: 10970177     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dvdy.23907     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Auerbach R, Kubai L, Knighton D, Folkman J. 1974. A simple procedure for the long-term cultivation of chicken embryos. Dev Biol 41:391-394.
2. Brown CY, Eom DS, Amarnath S, Agarwala S. 2012. A simple technique for early in vivo electroporation of E1 chick embryos. Dev Dyn 241:545-552.
3. Brown ST, Wang J, Groves AK. 2005. Dlx gene expression during chick inner ear development. J Comp Neurol 483:48-65.
4. Bénazéraf B, Francois P, Baker RE, Denans N, Little ND, Pourquié O. 2010. A random cell motility gradient downstream of FGF controls elongation of an amniote embryo. Nature 466:248-252.
5. Chapman SC, Lawson A, Macarthur WC, Wiese RJ, Loechel RH, Burgos-Trinidad M, Wakefield JK, Ramabhadran R, Mauch TJ, Schoenwolf GC. 2005. Ubiquitous GFP expression in transgenic chickens using a lentiviral vector. Development 132:935-940.
6. Creuzet S, Vincent C, Couly G. 2005. Neural crest derivatives in ocular and periocular structures. Int J Dev Biol 49:161-171.
7. Datar S, Bhonde RR. 2005. Shell-less chick embryo culture as an alternative in vitro model to investigate glucose-induced malformations in mammalian embryo. Rev Diabet Stud 2:221-227.
8. del Barrio MG, Nieto MA. 2002. Overexpression of Snail family members highlights their ability to promote chick neural crest formation. Development 129:1583-1593.
9. Dugan JD Jr, Lawton MT, Glaser B, Brem H. 1991. A new technique for explanation and in vitro cultivation of chicken embryos. Anat Rec 229:125-128.
10. El-Ghali N, Rabadi M, Ezin AM, De Bellard ME. 2010. New methods for chicken embryo manipulations. Microsc Res Tech 73:58-66.
11. Gammill LS, Krull CE. 2011. Embryological and genetic manipulation of chick development. Methods Mol Biol 770:119-137.
12. Goldstein RS. 2006. Transplantation of human embryonic stem cells to the chick embryo. Methods Mol Biol 331:137-151.
13. Griswold SL, Lwigale PY. 2012. Analysis of neural crest migration and differentiation by cross-species transplantation. J Vis Exp 7:3622.
14. Hamburger V, Hamilton HL. 1951. A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. J Morph 88:49-92.
15. Himly M, Foster DN, Bottoli I, Iacovoni JS, Vogt PK. 1998. The DF-1 chicken fibroblast cell line: transformation induced by diverse oncogenes and cell death resulting from infection by avian leukosis viruses. Virology 248:295-304.
16. Le Douarin NM. 1973. A biological cell labeling technique and its use in experimental embryology. Dev Biol 30:217-222.
17. Le Lièvre CS. 1978. Participation of neural crest-derived cells in the genesis of the skull in birds. J Embryol Exp Morph 47:17-37.
18. Luo J, Redies C. 2005. Ex ovo electroporation for gene transfer into older chicken embryos. Dev Dyn 233:1470-1477.
19. Lwigale PY, Schneider RA. 2008. Other chimeras: quail-duck and mouse-chick. Methods Cell Biol 87:59-74.
20. Lwigale PY, Cressy PA, Bronner-Fraser M. 2005. Corneal keratocytes retain neural crest progenitor cell properties. Dev Biol 288:284-293.
21. Merino R, Macias D, Gañan Y, Economides AN, Wang X, Wu Q, Stahl N, Sampath KT, Varona P, Hurle JM. 1999. Expression and function of Gdf-5 during digit skeletogenesis in the embryonic chick leg bud. Dev Biol 206:33-45.
22. Mottet NK, Jensen HM. 1968. The differentiation of chick embryonic skin: An electron microscopic study with a description of peculiar epidermal cytoplasmic ultrastructure. Exp Cell Res 52:261-283.
23. Nakamura H, Katahira T, Watanabe Y, Funahshi J. 2004. Gain- and loss-of-function in chick embryos by electroporation. Mech Dev 121:1137-1143.
24. New DAT. 1955. A new technique for the cultivation of the chick embryo in vitro. J Embryol Exp Morph 3:320-332.
25. Rouzankina I, Abate-Shen C, Niswander L. 2004. Dlx genes integrate positive and negative signals during feather bud development. Dev Biol 265:219-233.
26. Sauka-Spengler T, Barembaum M. 2008. Gain- and loss-of-function approaches in the chick embryo. Methods Cell Biol 87:237-256.
27. Summerbell D. 1974. A quantitative analysis of the effect of excision of the AER from the chick limb-bud. J Embryo Exp Morph 32:651-660.
28. Trimarchi JM, Harpavat S, Billings NA, Cepko CL. 2008. Thyroid hormone components are expressed in three sequential waves during development of the chick retina. BMC Dev Biol 8:1-20.
29. Wessells NK. 1961. An analysis of chick epidermal differentiation in situ and in vitro in chemically defined media. Dev Biol 3:355-389.
30. Wood JL, Hughes AJ, Mercer KJ, Chapman SC. 2010. Analysis of chick (Gallus gallus) middle ear columella formation. BMC Dev Biol 10:1-12.
31. Zou Y, Mak SS, Liu HZ, Han DY, Zhuang HX, Yang SM, Ladher RK. 2012. Induction of the chick columella and its integration with the inner ear. Dev Dyn 241:1104-1110.