Venn diagrams in cardiovascular disease: The heart team concept

European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 255-257

  Holmes, David R ^a   Mohr, Friedrich ^b   Hamm, Christian W ^c   Mack, Michael J ^d  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG HEART CENTER   (Germany)

^c Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax Center   (Germany)

^d The Heart Hospital   (United States)

Author keywords

Cardiac surgery; Cardiology; Heart valve; Percutaneous; Professional affairs

Indexed keywords

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; AORTA VALVE STENOSIS; ARTS AND ILLUSTRATION; ATHEROSCLEROSIS; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY; CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM EXAMINATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EDITORIAL; HEALTH CARE COST; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PERIPHERAL OCCLUSIVE ARTERY DISEASE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REIMBURSEMENT; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION; VENN DIAGRAM;

CARDIOLOGY; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; DATA DISPLAY; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PATIENT CARE TEAM;

EID: 84872709349     PISSN: 10107940     EISSN: 1873734X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs656     Document Type: Editorial

References (11)

1. Chen H, Boutros PC. Venn diagram: a package for the generation of highly customizable Venn and Euler diagrams in R. BMC Bioinformatics 2011;12:35.
2. Taylor C, Munro AJ, Glynne-Jones R. Multidisciplinary team working in cancer: what is the evidence? Br Med J 2010;340:c951.
3. Gabel M, Hilton NE, Nathanson SD. Multidisciplinary breast cancer clinics. Do they work? Cancer 1997;79:2380-4.
4. Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, Colombo A, Holmes DR, Mack MJ et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2009; 360:961-72.
5. Rothberg MB, Sivalingam SK, Ashraf J, Visintainer P, Joelson J, Kleppel R et al. Patients' and cardiologists' perceptions of the benefits of percutaneous coronary intervention for stable coronary disease. Ann Intern Med 2010;153:307-13.
6. Brownlee S, Wennberg J, Barry M, Fisher E, Goodman D, Bynum J. Improving Patient Decision-Making in Health Care: A 2011 Dartmouth Atlas Report Highlighting Minnesota. The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, 2011.
7. Kolh P, Wijns W, Danchin N, Di Mario C, Falk V, Folliguet T et al. Task force on myocardial revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010;38:S1-52.
8. Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, Bittl JA, Bridges CR, Byrne JG et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2011;124:2610-42.
9. Holmes DR Jr, Mack MJ. Transcatheter valve therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:445-55.
10. Holmes DR Jr, Mack MJ, Kaul S, Agnihotri A, Alexander KP, Bailey SR et al. 2012 ACCF/AATS/SCAI/STS expert consensus document on transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 2012;93:1340-95.
11. Carroll JD, Edwards FH, Marinac-Dabic D, Brindis R, Grover F, Peterson E et al., on behalf of the STS/ACC TVT Registry Steering Committee. A new partnership and infrastructure for the introduction and surveillance of medical devices and therapies. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; in press.