The purpose of this study is to: Connecting lexical bundles and moves in research article introductions

Journal of English for Academic Purposes

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 33-43

  Cortes, Viviana ^a  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic writing; Communicative functions; Lexical bundles; Moves

Indexed keywords

EID: 84872664347     PISSN: 14751585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2012.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Aktas N., Cortes V. A comparative corpus-based study of shell nouns as cohesive devices in published and ESL student writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2008, 7:3-14.
2. Altenberg B., Eeg-Olofsson M. Phraseology in spoken English: presentation of a project. Theory and practice in corpus linguistics 1990, 1-26. Rodopi, Amsterdam. J. Aarts, W. Meijs (Eds.).
3. Altenberg B. Recurrent word combinations in spoken English. Proceedings of the fifth Nordic Association for English Studies conference 1993, 17-27. University of Iceland, Reykjavik. J. D'Arcy (Ed.).
4. Altenberg B. On the phraseology of spoken English: the evidence of recurrent word-combinations. Phraseology: Theory, analysis, and applications 1998, 101-122. Clarendon Press, Oxford. A.H. Cowie (Ed.).
5. Anthony L. Writing research article introductions in software engineering: how accurate is the standard model?. IEEE Transactions in Professional Communication 1999, 42:38-46.
6. Barfield A., Gyllstad H. Researching collocations in another language 2010, Macmillan Publishers Limited, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire.
7. Bhatia V. Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings 1993, Longman, London.
8. Biber D., Conrad S. Lexical bundles in conversation and academic prose. Out of corpora: Studies in honor of Stig Johansson 1999, 181-189. Rodopi, Amsterdam. H. Hasselgard, S. Oksefjell (Eds.).
9. Biber D., Johansson S., Leech G., Conrad S., Finegan E. Longman grammar of spoken and written English 1999, Pearson, Harlow.
10. Biber D., Conrad S., Leech G. Longman student grammar of spoken and written English 2002, Pearson, Harlow.
11. Biber D., Conrad S., Cortes V. Towards a taxonomy of lexical bundles in speech and writing. Corpus linguistics by the Lune: A Festschrift for Geoffrey Leech 2003, 71-92. Peter Lang, Frankfurt/Maine. A. Wilson, P. Rayson, T. McEnery (Eds.).
12. Biber D., Conrad S., Cortes V. If you look at...: lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics 2004, 25:371-405.
13. Biber D., Connor U., Upton T. Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure 2007, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
14. Biber D. University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers 2006, Benjamin, Amsterdam.
15. Brett P. A genre analysis of the result sections of sociology articles. English for Specific Purposes 1994, 13:47-59.
16. Chu B.K.S. Introductions in state-of-the-art, argumentative, and teaching tips TESL journal articles: Three possible sub-genres of introductions? 1996, City University of Hong Kong, Research Monograph No. 12.
17. Connor U., Mauranen A. Linguistic analysis of grant proposals: European Union research grants. English for Specific Purposes 1999, 18:47-62.
18. Connor U., Davis J., De Rycker T. Correctness and clarity in applying for overseas jobs: a cross-cultural analysis of US and Flemish applications. Text 1995, 15:457-475.
19. Cortes, V. (2002). Lexical bundles in academic writing in history and biology. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Northern Arizona University. Flagstaff, Arizona.
20. Cortes V. Lexical bundles in published and student writing in history and biology. English for Specific Purposes 2004, 23:397-423.
21. Cortes V. A comparative analysis of lexical bundles in academic history writing in English and Spanish. Corpora 2008, 3:43-58.
22. Cortes V. Genre analysis in the academic writing class: with or without corpora? Cuaderns de Filologia. Estudis Linguistcs 2011, XVI:41-64.
23. Dudley-Evans T. Genre: how far can we, should we go?. World Englishes 1995, 16:353-358.
24. Durrant P., Mathews-Aydinli J. A function-first approach to identifying formulaic language in academic writing. English for Specific Purposes 2011, 30:58-72.
25. Flowerdew J., Li Y. Language re-use among Chinese apprentice scientists writing for publication. Applied Linguistics 2007, 28:440-465.
26. Gray B., Cortes V. Perception vs. evidence: an analysis of this and these in academic prose. English for Specific Purposes 2010, 30:31-43.
27. Henry A., Rosenberry R.L. A narrow-angled corpus analysis of moves and strategies of the genre: 'Letter of Application'. English for Specific Purposes 2001, 20:153-167.
28. Holmes R. Genre Analysis and the social sciences: an investigation of the structure of research article discussion sections in three disciplines. English for Specific Purposes 1997, 16:321-337.
29. Hyland K. As can be seen: lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes 2008, 27:4-21.
30. Jamblokai R. English in the context of European integration: a corpus-driven analysis of lexical bundles in English EU documents. English for Specific Purposes 2010, 29:253-267.
31. Kanoksilapatham, B. (2003). A Corpus-based investigation of scientific research articles: linking move analysis with multidimensional analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
32. Kanoksilapatham B. Rhetorical moves in biochemistry research articles. Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure 2007, 73-119. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. D. Biber, U. Connor, T.A. Upton (Eds.).
33. Li L., Ge G. Genre analysis: structural and linguistic evolution of the English-medium medical research article (1985-2004). English for Specific Purposes 2009, 28:93-104.
34. Motta-Roth D. Discourse analysis and academic book reviews: a study of text and disciplinary cultures. Genre studies in English for academic purposes 1998, 29-57. Universita Jaume I, Castellon, Spain. I. Fontanet, S. Posteguillo, J. Palmer, J. Coll (Eds.).
35. Nattinger J.R., DeCarrico J. Lexical phrases and language teaching 1992, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
36. Nwogu K. Structure of science popularizations: a genre-analysis approach to the schema of popularized medical texts. English for Specific Purposes 1991, 10:111-123.
37. Pawley A., Syder F.H. Two puzzles for linguistic theory: native like selection and native like fluency. Language and communication 1983, 191-227. Longman, London. J. Richards, R. Schmidt (Eds.).
38. Posteguillo S. The schematic structure of computer science research articles. English for Specific Purposes 1999, 18:139-160.
39. Schmid H. English abstract nouns as conceptual shells: From corpus to cognition 2000, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.
40. Swales J. Aspects of article introductions 1981, The University of Aston, Language Studies Unit, Birmingham, UK.
41. Swales J. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings 1990, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
42. Swales J. Research genres: Exploration and applications 2004, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
43. Williams I.A. Results sections of medical research articles: analysis of rhetorical categories for pedagogical purposes. English for Specific Purposes 1999, 18:347-366.
44. Yang R., Allison D. Research articles in applied linguistics: moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes 2003, 22:365-385.