Estimating the True Accuracy of Diagnostic Tests for Dengue Infection Using Bayesian Latent Class Models

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Pan ngum, Wirichada ^a   Blacksell, Stuart D ^a,b   Lubell, Yoel ^a   Pukrittayakamee, Sasithon ^a   Bailey, Mark S ^c   de Silva, H Janaka ^d   Lalloo, David G ^e   Day, Nicholas P J ^a,b   White, Lisa J ^a,b   Limmathurotsakul, Direk ^a  

^a MAHIDOL UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c QUEEN ELIZABETH HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF KELANIYA   (Sri Lanka)

^e LIVERPOOL SCHOOL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IMMUNOGLOBULIN G ANTIBODY; IMMUNOGLOBULIN M ANTIBODY;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BAYESIAN LATENT CLASS MODEL; COHORT ANALYSIS; DENGUE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; FEMALE; GOLD STANDARD; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PANBIO DUO CASSETE IGG; PANBIO DUO CASSETE IGM; PANBIO NS1 ANTIGEN TEST; PANBIO NS1+IGM; PANBIO NS1+IGM+IGG; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREVALENCE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SRI LANKA; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADULT; BAYES THEOREM; COHORT STUDIES; DENGUE; FEMALE; HOSPITALS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; REFERENCE STANDARDS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

NUCLEOPOLYHEDROVIRUS;

EID: 84872587704     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050765     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Blacksell SD, Mammen MP Jr, Thongpaseuth S, Gibbons RV, Jarman RG, et al. (2008) Evaluation of the Panbio dengue virus nonstructural 1 antigen detection and immunoglobulin M antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for the diagnosis of acute dengue infections in Laos. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 60: 43-49.
2. Teles FR, Prazeres DM, Lima-Filho JL, (2005) Trends in dengue diagnosis. Rev Med Virol 15: 287-302.
3. Lam SK, Lum LCS, (1998) Rapid Dengue Diagnosis: A Prospective Study using a Commercial Rapid Test. WHO Dengue Bulletin 22.
4. Blacksell SD, Newton PN, Bell D, Kelley J, Mammen MP Jr, et al. (2006) The comparative accuracy of 8 commercial rapid immunochromatographic assays for the diagnosis of acute dengue virus infection. Clin Infect Dis 42: 1127-1134.
5. Blacksell SD, Doust JA, Newton PN, Peacock SJ, Day NP, et al. (2006) A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of rapid immunochromatographic assays for the detection of dengue virus IgM antibodies during acute infection. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 100: 775-784.
6. Blacksell SD, Jarman RG, Bailey MS, Tanganuchitcharnchai A, Jenjaroen K, et al. (2011) Evaluation of six commercial point-of-care tests for diagnosis of acute dengue infections: the need for combining NS1 antigen and IgM/IgG antibody detection to achieve acceptable levels of accuracy. Clin Vaccine Immunol 18: 2095-2101.
7. Blacksell SD, Jarman RG, Gibbons RV, Tanganuchitcharnchai A, Mammen MP Jr, et al. (2012) Comparison of seven commercial antigen and antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for detection of acute dengue infection. Clin Vaccine Immunol 19: 804-810.
8. Limmathurotsakul D, Jamsen K, Arayawichanont A, Simpson JA, White LJ, et al. (2010) Defining the true sensitivity of culture for the diagnosis of melioidosis using Bayesian latent class models. PLoS One 5: e12485.
9. Speybroeck N, Praet N, Claes F, Van Hong N, Torres K, et al. (2011) True versus apparent malaria infection prevalence: the contribution of a Bayesian approach. PLoS One 6: e16705.
10. Limmathurotsakul D, Turner EL, Wuthiekanun V, Thaipadungpanit J, Suputtamongkol Y, et al. (2012) Fool's gold: Why imperfect reference tests are undermining the evaluation of novel diagnostics: a reevaluation of 5 diagnostic tests for leptospirosis. Clin Infect Dis 55: 322-331.
11. Limmathurotsakul D, Chantratita N, Teerawattanasook N, Piriyagitpaiboon K, Thanwisai A, et al. (2011) Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the diagnosis of melioidosis: better than we thought. Clin Infect Dis 52: 1024-1028.
12. Innis BL, Nisalak A, Nimmannitya S, Kusalerdchariya S, Chongswasdi V, et al. (1989) An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to characterize dengue infections where dengue and Japanese encephalitis co-circulate. Am J Trop Med Hyg 40: 418-427.
13. Ellis RD, Fukuda MM, McDaniel P, Welch K, Nisalak A, et al. (2006) Causes of fever in adults on the Thai-Myanmar border. Am J Trop Med Hyg 74: 108-113.
14. Gibbons RV, Kalanarooj S, Jarman RG, Nisalak A, Vaughn DW, et al. (2007) Analysis of repeat hospital admissions for dengue to estimate the frequency of third or fourth dengue infections resulting in admissions and dengue hemorrhagic fever, and serotype sequences. Am J Trop Med Hyg 77: 910-913.
15. Strickman D, Sithiprasasna R, Kittayapong P, Innis BL, (2000) Distribution of dengue and Japanese encephalitis among children in rural and suburban Thai villages. Am J Trop Med Hyg 63: 27-35.
16. Vaughn DW, Nisalak A, Solomon T, Kalayanarooj S, Nguyen MD, et al. (1999) Rapid serologic diagnosis of dengue virus infection using a commercial capture ELISA that distinguishes primary and secondary infections. Am J Trop Med Hyg 60: 693-698.
17. Zhou X, McClish DK, Obuchowski NA, (2008) Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine. Wiley-Blackwell.
18. Joseph L, Gyorkos TW, Coupal L, (1995) Bayesian estimation of disease prevalence and the parameters of diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard. Am J Epidemiol 141: 263-272.
19. Dendukuri N, Joseph L, (2001) Bayesian approaches to modeling the conditional dependence between multiple diagnostic tests. Biometrics 57: 158-167.
20. Lunn D, Spiegelhalter D, Thomas A, Best N, (2009) The BUGS project: Evolution, critique and future directions. Stat Med 28: 3049-3067.
21. Deen JL, Harris E, Wills B, Balmaseda A, Hammond SN, et al. (2006) The WHO dengue classification and case definitions: time for a reassessment. Lancet 368: 170-173.
22. Spiegelhalter DJ, (2004) Incorporating Bayesian Ideas into Health-Care Evaluation. Statist Sci 19: 156-174.
23. Spiegelhalter DJ, Abrams KR, Myles JP (2004) Bayesian Approaches to Clinical Trials and Health-Care Evaluation (Statistics in Practice). West Sussex, John Wiley & Sons.
24. Banoo S, Bell D, Bossuyt P, Herring A, Mabey D, et al. (2006) Evaluation of diagnostic tests for infectious diseases: general principles. Nat Rev Microbiol 4: S20-S32.
25. Fry SR, Meyer M, Semple MG, Simmons CP, Sekaran SD, et al. (2011) The diagnostic sensitivity of dengue rapid test assays is significantly enhanced by using a combined antigen and antibody testing approach. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 5: e1199.
26. Hu D, Di B, Ding X, Wang Y, Chen Y, et al. (2011) Kinetics of non-structural protein 1, IgM and IgG antibodies in dengue type 1 primary infection. Virol J 8: 47.
27. Wang SM, Sekaran SD, (2010) Evaluation of a commercial SD dengue virus NS1 antigen capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit for early diagnosis of dengue virus infection. J Clin Microbiol 48: 2793-2797.
28. Bernatsky S, Lix L, Hanly JG, Hudson M, Badley E, et al. (2011) Surveillance of systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases using administrative data. Rheumatol Int 31: 549-554.
29. Blacksell SD, Bell D, Kelley J, Mammen MP Jr, Gibbons RV, et al. (2007) Prospective study to determine accuracy of rapid serological assays for diagnosis of acute dengue virus infection in Laos. Clin Vaccine Immunol 14: 1458-1464.