Exploring a methodology for eHealth indicator development

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 180, Issue , 2012, Pages 338-342

  Hyppönen, Hannele ^a   Ammenwerth, Elske ^b   De Keizer, Nicolet ^c  

^a NATIONAL PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY FOR HEALTH SCIENCES   (Austria)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

EHealth; Evaluation; Method; Quality indicator

Indexed keywords

BOTTOM UP APPROACH; EVALUATION; HOLISTIC APPROACH; INDICATOR DEVELOPMENT; INDICATOR SELECTIONS; INTERNATIONAL POLICIES; METHOD; QUALITY INDICATORS;

EHEALTH;

ARTICLE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; TELEMEDICINE;

DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; INTERNATIONALITY; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 84872576072     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-61499-101-4-338     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. eHealth indicators. Europe's Information Society, Thematic portal. http://ec.europa.eu/information-society/newsroom/cf/itemlongdetail.cfm?item-id= 4966. (10.1.2012)
2. Developing indicators and impact assessment methodologies on ICT for Ageing Well. Exploratory workshop, Brussels, 19 October 2009, Borchette Centre. http://ec.europa.eu/information-society/activities/einclusion/policy/ageing/ assessment-workshop-09/index-en.htm. Access date 2.1.2012 (10.1.2012)
3. Lawrence M. and Olesen F. Indicators of Quality in Health Care. Eur J Gen Pract 1997; 3(3):103-108.
4. i2010 High Level Group. Benchmarking Digital Europe 2011-2015 a conceptual framework. ISSUE NO: 27, October, 2009. http://ec.europa.eu/ information-society/eeurope/i2010/docs/benchmarking/benchmarking-digital-europe- 2011-2015.pdf. (10.1.2012)
5. Global eHealth - Measuring Outcomes: why, What and How. Bellagio, Italy, July 13-August 8, 2008. http://www.ehealth-connection.org/files/conf-materials/ Global%20eHealth%20-%20Measuring%20Outcomes-0.pdf. (10.1.2012)
6. Ammenwerth E, de Keizer N. An inventory of evaluation studies of information technology in health care: Trends in evaluation research 1982 - 2002. Methods of Information in Medicine. 2005;44:44-56.
7. Lampe K. and Mäkelä, M. (eds). EUnetHTA WP4 - HTA core model for medical and surgical interventions. 1.0R 31 Dec 2008. http://www.eunethta. eu/upload/WP4/Final%20Deliverables/ HTA%20Core%20Model%20for%20Medical%20and%20Surgical%20Interventions%201%200r. pdf. (10.1.2012)
8. MAST. Model for ASsessment of Telemedicine. http://www.mast-model.info/ (10.1.2012).
9. Hyppönen H, Ammenwerth, E, Nohr, C, Faxwaag, A, Walldius, Å. Towards an International Minimum Dataset for Monitoring National Health Information System Implementations. In: A. Moen et al. (Eds.) User Centred Networked Health Care. 23rd International Conference of the European Federation for Medical Informatics. - MIE 2011 / CD / Workshops
10. Reed Mark S., Fraser Evan D.G., Dougill Andrew J. An adaptive learning process for developing and applying sustainability indicators with local communities. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS 59 (2006) 406-418
11. Meyer, I., Hüsing, T., Didero, M., Korte, W.B eHealth Benchmarking (Phase II) Final Report. Bonn, March 2009 [84 pages, PDF, 1.7MB]. http://ec.europa.eu/information-society/eeurope/i2010/docs/benchmarking/ ehealth-ii-bench-final-report.pdf. (10.1.1012)
12. eHealth Benchmarking. Online Knowledge Base of Data sources. http://kb.ehealthbenchmarking.eu/search.do. (10.1.2012)
13. eHealth Benchmarking Good Practice. 12 case studies of eHealth benchmarking activities. http://ec.europa.eu/information-society/eeurope/i2010/ benchmarking/index-en.htm. (10.1.2012)
14. eHealth Benchmarking Country Briefs. Comparative summaries of the eHealth benchmarking situation in all 31 countries under observation. http://www.ehealth-benchmarking.eu/results/results.html (1.12.2012)
15. Safran C, Bloomrosen M, Hammond WE, Labkoff SE, Markel-Fox S, Tang P, Detmer D. toward a National Framework for the Secondary Use of health Data. A report of a working conference of the AMIA 9714/06. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/17077452. (2.1.2012)
16. Hyppönen H, Doupi P, Hämäläinen P, Komulainen J, Nykänen P, Suomi R. "Towards a National Health Information System Evaluation". In: C. Safran et al. (Eds.) MEDINFO 2010, IOS Press, 2010, pp. 1216 - 1220.
17. Brook RH, Chassin MR, Fink A et al. A method for the detailed assessment of the appropriateness of medical technologies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1986;2:53-63
18. Van Engen-Verheul M, Kemps H, Kraaijenhagen R, De Keizer N, Peek N. Modified Rand method to derive quality indicators: a case study in cardiac rehabilitation. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;169:88-92
19. Donabedian, A. 1980. The Definition of Quality and Approaches to its Assessment, Ann Arbor, Health Administration Press.
20. Krobock JR. A taxonomy: hospital information systems evaluation methodologies. J Med Syst 1984; 8(5): 419-29.
21. Van der Loo R. Overview of published assessment and evaluation studies. In: van Gennip EMSJ, Talmon JS, eds. Assessment and evaluation of information technologies. Amsterdam: IOS Press. 1995. Pp. 261-82.
22. Hyppönen H, Ammenwerth E, Faxwaag A, Nohr C, Walldius Å. eHealth indicators: results of the MIE 2011 workshop. Accepted as full paper for MIE2012.
23. Nykänen P, Brender J, Talmon J, de Keizer N, Rigby M, Beuscart-Zephir MC, Ammenwerth E. Guideline for good evaluation practice in health informatics (GEP-HI). Int J Med Inform. 2011 Dec;80(12):815-27. (10.2.2012)