Modified rand method to derive quality indicators: A case study in cardiac rehabilitation

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 169, Issue , 2011, Pages 88-92

  Van Engen Verheul, Mariëtte ^a   Kemps, Hareld ^a,b   Kraaijenhagen, Roderik ^c   De Keizer, Nicolette ^a   Peek, Niels ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b MÁXIMA MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c NDDO Institute for Prevention and Early Diagnostics   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cardiac Rehabilitation; Health Care; Quality Indicators

Indexed keywords

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; HEALTH CARE;

CARDIAC REHABILITATIONS; COMPUTERIZED DECISION; IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES; LITERATURE SEARCH; PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK; QUALITY INDICATORS; QUALITY OF CARE;

HEART;

EID: 83055192009     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-806-9-88     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Power NR et al. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 1999;282:1458-65. (Pubitemid 29493800)
2. Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA 2005;293:1223-38. (Pubitemid 40327908)
3. Jamtvedt G, Young JM, Kristoffersen DT et al. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;(2):CD000259.
4. Brook RH, Chassin MR, Fink A et al. A method for the detailed assessment of the appropriateness of medical technologies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1986;2:53-63.
5. Hicks N. Some observations on attempts to measure appropriateness of care. BMJ 1994;309(6956):730-3. (Pubitemid 24285233)
6. Kelley E, Hurst J. Health care quality indicators project; Conceptual framework paper. OECD; 2006.
7. Moscovice I, Armstrong P, Shortell S et al. Health services research for decision-makers: the use of the Delphi technique to determine health priorities. J Health Polit Policy Law 1977;2:388-410.
8. Dunham RB. NGT: a users' guide. University of Wisconsin School of Business; 1998.
9. Goud R, de Keizer NF, ter Riet G et al. Effect of guideline based CDS on decision making of multidisciplinary teams: cluster randomised trial in cardiac rehabilitation. BMJ 2009;338:1440-9.
10. Van Engen-Verheul M, de Keizer N, Hellemans I et al. Design of a continuous multifaceted guidelineimplementation strategy based on CDS. Stud Health Technol Inform 2010;160:836-40