Learning Conceptual Hierarchies by Iterated Relational Consolidation

Building Bridges Across Cognitive Sciences Around the World - Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 324-329

  Foster, James M ^a   Cañas, Fabián ^a   Jones, Matt ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Analogy; Concept Learning; Predication; Refinement; Relational Consolidation; Schema Induction

Indexed keywords

REINFORCEMENT LEARNING;

ANALOGICAL REASONING; ANALOGY; CONCEPT LEARNING; CONCEPTUAL HIERARCHY; HIGH-ORDER; PREDICATION; REFINEMENT; REINFORCEMENT LEARNINGS; RELATIONAL CONSOLIDATION; SCHEMA INDUCTION;

COMPUTATION THEORY;

EID: 84872570485     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Anderson, J. R. & Lebiere, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Clark, A. (2006). Language, embodiment, and the cognitive niche. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(8), 370–374.
3. Corral, D., & Jones, M. (in press). Learning of relational categories as a function of higher-order structure. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
4. Doumas, L. A. A., Hummel, J. E., & Sandhofer, C. M. (2008). A theory of the discovery and predication of relational concepts. Psychological Review, 115(1), 1–43.
5. Falkenhainer, B., Forbus, K. D., & Gentner, D. (1989). The structure-mapping engine: Algorithm and examples. Artificial intelligence, 41(1), 1–63.
6. Forbus, K. D., Gentner, D., & Law, K. (1995). MAC/FAC: A model of similarity-based retrieval. Cognitive Science, 19(2), 141–205.
7. Gardner, M. (1970). Mathematical Games - The fantastic combinations of John Conway's new solitaire game "life". Scientific American, 223, 120-123.
8. Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive science, 7(2), 155–170.
9. Gentner, D., Bowdle, B., Wolff, P., & Boronat, C. (2001). Metaphor is like analogy. In D. Gentner, K.J. Holyoak, & B.K. Kokinov (eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science, 199–253.
10. Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive psychology, 15(1), 1–38.
11. Gluck, M. A. & Bower, G. H. (1988). From conditioning to category learning: An adaptive network model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 227-247.
12. Gluck, M. A., & Myers, C. E. (1993). Hippocampal mediation of stimulus representation: A computational theory. Hippocampus, 3(4), 491–516.
13. Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (2003). A symbolic-connectionist theory of relational inference and generalization. Psychological Review, 110(2), 220.
14. Jones, M., & Canas, F. (2010). Integrating reinforcement learning with models of representation learning. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
15. Jones, M., & Love, B. C. (2007). Beyond common features: The role of roles in determining similarity. Cognitive Psychology, 55(3), 196–231.
16. Kuehne, S., Forbus, K., Gentner, D., & Quinn, B. (2000). SEQL: Category learning as progressive abstraction using structure mapping. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 770–775).
17. Larkey, L. B., & Love, B. C. (2003). CAB: Connectionist analogy builder. Cognitive Science, 27(5), 781–794.
18. Lupyan, G., Rakison, D. H., & McClelland, J. L. (2007). Language is not Just for Talking. Psychological Science, 18(12), 1077.
19. McClelland, J. L., McNaughton, B. L., & O’Reilly, R. C. (1995). Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychological review, 102(3), 419.
20. Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive psychology, 8(3), 382–439.
21. Son, J. Y., Doumas, L. A. A., & Goldstone, R. L. (2010). When Do Words Promote Analogical Transfer? The Journal of Problem Solving, 3(1), 4.
22. Squire, L. R. & Alvarez, P. (1995). Retrograde amnesia and memory consolidation: a neurobiological perspective. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 5, 169-177.
23. Thompson, R. K. R., Oden, D. L., & Boysen, S. T. (1997). Language-naive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) judge relations between relations in a conceptual matching-to-sample task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 23(1), 31-43.
24. Tomlinson, M., & Love, B. C. (2006). Learning abstract relations through analogy to concrete exemplars. Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2269–2274).