The Relationship between Student Identity Development and the Perception of Political Bias in the College Classroom

College Teaching

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 49-55

  Linvill, Darren L ^a  

^a CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

classroom environment; identity development; ideology; pedagogy; political bias; student development

Indexed keywords

EID: 84872555374     PISSN: 87567555     EISSN: 19308299     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/87567555.2010.511312     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. AAUP: The academic bill of rights. 2008. http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/issues/ABOR/ (accessed July 10, 2009)
2. A special report: The Chronicle survey of public opinion on higher education. 2004. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 50 (35): A12–13. May 7
3. Adams, G. R., and Fitch, S. A., 1983. Psychological environments of university departments: Effects on college students’ identity status and ego stage development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44 (6): 1266–1275.
4. Balistreri, E., Busch-Rossnagel, N. A., and Geisinger, K. F., 1995. Development and preliminary validation of the ego identity process questionnaire. Journal of Adolescence, 18: 172–192.
5. Bennion, L. D., and Adams, G. R., 1986. A revision of the extended version of the objective measure for ego identity status: An identity instrument for use with late adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 1: 183–197.
6. Berzonsky, M. D., 1988. “ Self-theorists, identity status and social cognition ”. In Self, ego and identity: Integrative approaches, Edited by: Lapsley, D. K., and Power, F. C., 243–262. New York: Springer-Verlag.
7. Berzonsky, M. D., 1989. The self as a theorist: Individual differences in identity formation. International Journal of Personal Construct Psychology, 2: 363–376.
8. Berzonsky, M. D., 1992. “ A process perspective on identity and stress management ”. In Advances in adolescent development: Adolescent identity formation, Vol. 4, Edited by: Adams, G. R., Gullotta, T. P., and Montemayor, R., 193–215. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9. Berzonsky, M. D., and Adams, G. R., 1999. Reevaluating the identity status paradigm: Still useful after 35 years. Developmental Review, 19: 557–590.
10. Buckley, W. F., 1951. God and man at Yale; the superstitions of academic freedom, Chicago: Regnery Publishing.
11. Chapman, E. N., and Werner-Wilson, R. J., 2008. Does positive youth development predict adolescent attitudes about sexuality?. Adolescence, 43 (171): 505–523.
12. Clancy, S. M., and Dollinger, S. J., 1993. Identity, self, and personality: Identity status and the five factor model of personality. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 3 (3): 227–245.
13. Erikson, E. H., 1950. Childhood and society, New York: Norton.
14. Fisler, J., and Foubert, J. A, J. A., 2006. Teach me, but don't disagree with me. About Campus, 11 (5): 2–8.
15. th anniversary ed., New York: Continuum.
16. Gross, N., and Simmons, S., 2007. The social and political views of American professors. http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/~ngross/lounsbery_9–25.pdf (accessed January 14, 2008)
17. Horowitz, D., and E. Lehrer, E., 2003. Political bias in the administrations and faculties of 32 elite colleges and universities. http://www.studentsforacademicfreedom.org/reports/lackdiversity.html (accessed March 2, 2007)
18. Joint statement on rights and freedoms of students. http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/pubsres/policydocs/stud-rights.htm (accessed June 11, 2007)
19. Kelly-Woessner, A., and Woessner, M., 2008. Conflict in the classroom: Considering the effects of partisan difference on political education. Journal of Political Science Education, 4 (3): 265–285.
20. Kemmelmeier, M., Danielson, C., and Basten, J., 2005. What's in a grade? Academic success and political orientation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31: 1386–1399.
21. King, P. M., 2000. Learning to make reflective judgments. New Direction for Teaching and Learning, 82: 15–27.
22. Linvill, D. L., and Havice, P. A., In press. Political bias on campus: Understanding the student experience. The Journal of College Student Development.,
23. Marcia, J. E., 1966. Development and validation of ego identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3: 551–558.
24. Marcia, J. E., 1980. “ Identity in adolescence ”. In Handbook of Adolescent Psychology, Edited by: Adelson, J., 159–187. New York: Wiley.
25. Mariani, M. D., and Hewitt, G. J., 2008. Indoctrination U.? Faculty ideology and changes in student political orientation. PS: Political Science and Politics, 41 (4): 773–783.
26. Minnich, E., 2006. Between impartiality and bias. Change, 38 (3): 16–23.
27. Schwartz, S. J., 2002. Convergent validity in objective measures of identity status: Implications for identity status theory. Adolescence, 37: 609–625.
28. Shea, J., Crossman, S. M., and Adams, G. R., 1978. Physical attractiveness and personality development. The Journal of Psychology, 99: 59–62.
29. Students for Academic Freedom, Academic Bill of Rights. http://cms.studentsforacademicfreedom.org//index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1925&Itemid=43 (accessed July 10, 2009)
30. Toder, N. L., and Marcia, J. E., 1973. Ego identity status and response to conformity pressure in college women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26 (2): 287–294.
31. Zipp, J. F., and Fenwick, R., 2006. Is the academy a liberal hegemony? The political orientations and educational values of professors. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70: 304–326.