OSAT: A tool for sample-to-batch allocations in genomics experiments

BMC Genomics

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Yan, Li ^a   Ma, Changxing ^b   Wang, Dan ^a   Hu, Qiang ^a   Qin, Maochun ^a   Conroy, Jeffrey M ^a   Sucheston, Lara E ^a   Ambrosone, Christine B ^a   Johnson, Candace S ^a   Wang, Jianmin ^a   Liu, Song ^a  

^a ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BATCH PROCESS; BIOCONDUCTOR; CONDUCTOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS SOFTWARE; GENOMICS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; SAMPLING;

ALGORITHMS; DATA COLLECTION; GENOMICS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84872508256     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-689     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Lambert CG, Black LJ. Learning from our GWAS mistakes: from experimental design to scientific method. Biostat(Oxford, England) 2012, 13(2):195.
2. Baggerly KA, Coombes KR, Neeley ES. Run batch effects potentially compromise the usefulness of genomic signatures for ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008, 26(7):1186. 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.1951, 18309960.
3. Scherer A. Batch effects and noise in microarray experiments: sources and solutions 2009, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
4. Leek JT, Scharpf RB, Bravo HC, Simcha D, Langmead B, Johnson WE, Geman D, Baggerly K, Irizarry RA. Tackling the widespread and critical impact of batch effects in high-throughput data. Nat Rev Genet 2010, 11(10):733. 10.1038/nrg2825, 20838408.
5. Mak HC, Storey J. The importance of new statistical methods for high-throughput sequencing. Nat Biotechnol 2011, 29(4):331. 10.1038/nbt.1831, 21478851.
6. Murray L. Randomized Complete Block Designs 2005, New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
7. Montgomery DC. Design and Analysis of Experiments 2008, John Wiley & Sons: Wiley, 7th.
8. Fang K, Ma C. Uniform and Orthogonal Designs 2001, Beijing: Science Press.
9. Huang H, Lu X, Liu Y, Haaland P, Marron JS. R/DWD: Distance-Weighted Discrimination for classification, visualization and batch adjustment. Bioinformatics 2012, 28(8):1182. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts096, 22368246.
10. Marsit CJ, Koestler DC, Christensen BC, Karagas MR, Houseman EA, Kelsey KT. DNA methylation array analysis identifies profiles of blood-derived DNA methylation associated with bladder cancer. J clin oncol: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2011, 29(9):1133.
11. Li C, Rabinovic A. Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical Bayesmethods. Biostatistics 2007, 8:118. 10.1093/biostatistics/kxj037, 16632515.
12. Ma C, Fang K, Liski E. A new approach in constructing orthogonal and nearly orthogonal arrays. Metrika 2000, 50(3):255.
13. Chen C, Grennan K, Badner J, Zhang D, Gershon E, Jin L, Liu C. Removing batch effects inanalysis of expression microarray data: an evaluation of six batch adjustment methods. PLoS One 2011, 6(2):e17238. 10.1371/journal.pone.0017238, 3046121, 21386892.