Investigating the influence of sweep gas on CO2/N2 membranes for post-combustion capture

International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control

Volumn 13, Issue , 2013, Pages 180-190

  Franz, Johannes ^a   Schiebahn, Sebastian ^b   Zhao, Li ^b   Riensche, Ernst ^b   Scherer, Viktor ^a   Stolten, Detlef ^b,c  

^a RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

^b FORSCHUNGSZENTRUM JÜLICH   (Germany)

^c RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Permeability; Post combustion; Selectivity; Sweep gas

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; CATALYST SELECTIVITY; COMBUSTION; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ENERGY UTILIZATION; GASES; MECHANICAL PERMEABILITY; SEPARATION;

EFFICIENCY LOSS; POST-COMBUSTION; POST-COMBUSTION CAPTURES; PRESSURE DIFFERENCES; REFERENCE POWER PLANT; SELECTIVE MEMBRANES; SWEEP GAS; TECHNICAL ROUTE;

GAS PERMEABLE MEMBRANES;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; MEMBRANE; PERMEABILITY; SEPARATION;

EID: 84872503657     PISSN: 17505836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.12.008     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Best D., Beck B. Status of CCS development in China. Energy Procedia 2011, 4:6141-6147.
2. Blomen E., et al. Capture technologies: improvements and promising developments. Energy Procedia 2009, 1:1505-1512.
3. Bounaceur R., et al. Membrane processes of post-combustion carbon dioxide capture: a parametric study. Energy 2006, 31(14):2220-2234.
4. Brinkmann T., et al. Post-combustion processes employing polymeric membranes. 2nd International Conference on Energy Process Engineering Efficient Carbon Capture for Coal Power Plants 2011.
5. 2 separation. Journal of Membrane Science 2008, 307(1):88-95.
6. 2 in novel PVAm/PVA blend membrane. Journal of Membrane Science 2009, 340(1-2):154-163.
7. 2 quality recommendations. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2008, 2:478-484.
8. Favre E. Carbon dioxide recovery from post-combustion processes: can gas permeation membranes compete with absorption?. Journal of Membrane Science 2007, 294(1/2):50-59.
9. 2 Separation via the Post-combustion Process with Membranes in Coal Power Plants 2011, Wiley_VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany.
10. 2 scrubber. Fuel 2009, 88(12):2481-2488.
11. Grundlagen Verfahrenstechnik. (accessed 05.05.12). http://www.map.boku.ac.at/fileadmin/_/H89/H893/AG-THD/Grundlagen_Verfahrenstechnik/Kapitel_4.pdf.
12. 2 capture from flue gases using membrane technology. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 2008, 47:1562-1568.
13. 2 capture from flue gas by a facilitated transport membrane. Journal of Membrane Science 2010, 359:140-148.
14. Krumbeck M. Post combustion capture from coal. CSLF CCS Workshop 2007, http://www.cslforum.org/documents/Paris/Krumbeck_PostCombustionCapture_27March2007.pdf.
15. Lin H., Freeman B. Materials selection guidelines for membranes that remove CO from gas mixtures. Journal of Molecular Structure 2005, 739(1-3):57-74.
16. 2 capture processes on steam power plant performance. Energy Procedia 2011, 4:1385-1394.
17. Merkel T.C., et al. Power plant post-combustion carbon dioxide capture: an opportunity for membranes. Journal of Membrane Science 2010, 359:126-139.
18. Metz B., et al. IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage 2005, Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom & New York, USA, Available in full at:. http://www.ipcc.ch/.
19. Metz S., et al. Transport of water vapor and inert gas mixtures through highly selective and highly permeable polymer membranes. Journal of Membrane Science 2005, 251(1-2):29-41.
20. 2 capture project (CCP): results from phase II (2004-2009). Energy Procedia 2009, 1(1):55-62.
21. Mitrović M., Malone A. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) demonstration projects in Canada. Energy Procedia 2011, 4:5685-5691.
22. 2 gas separation membranes for the capture of carbon dioxide from power plant flue gases. Journal of Membrane Science 2006, 279(1/2):1-49.
23. Ramasubramanian K., Ho W.S.W. Recent developments on membranes for post-combustion carbon capture. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering 2011, 1(1):47-54.
24. 2 gas separation membranes. Journal of Membrane Science 2010, 352(1-2):126-135.
25. Konzeptstudie: Referenzkraftwerk Nordrhein-Westfalen (RKW NRW), February 2004. VGB Power Tech e.V., Essen, Germany.
26. Scholes C.A., et al. Effects of minor components in carbon dioxide capture using polymeric gas separation membranes. Separation & Purification Reviews 2009, 38(1):1-44.
27. Schreiber A., et al. Environmental impacts of coal-fired power generation with amine-based carbon capture - a life cycle approach. Proceedings of the 4th European Congress on Economics and Management of Energy in Industry 2007.
28. Shindo Y., et al. Calculation methods for multicomponent gas separation by permeation. Separation Science and Technology 1985, 20(5/6):445-459.
29. 2 removal from flue gas. Separation and Purification Technology 2008, 63(3):524-530.
30. World Energy Outlook, 2009. International Energy Agency, available from http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/docs/weo2009/WEO2009_es_english.pdf.
31. Yave W., et al. Nanostructured membrane material designed for carbon dioxide separation. Journal of Membrane Science 2010, 350(1/2):124-129.
32. 2 gas separation membrane processes for post-combustion capture. Journal of Membrane Science 2008, 325(1):284-294.
33. Zhao L., et al. Multi-stage gas separation membrane processes with post-combustion capture: energetic and economic analyses. Journal of Membrane Science 2010, 359:160-172.
34. Zhao L., et al. How gas separation membrane competes with chemical absorption in postcombustion capture. Energy Procedia 2011, 4:629-636.
35. 2 capture. Chemical Engineering & Technology 2012, 35(3):489-496.