Patient safety in midwifery-led care in the Netherlands

Midwifery

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 60-66

  Martijn, Lucie L M ^a   Jacobs, Annelies J E ^a   Maassen, Irma I M ^a   Buitendijk, Simone S E ^b   Wensing, Michel M ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b TNO   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Low risk pregnancy; Midwifery; Patient safety; Safety incident

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL ERROR; MEDICAL RECORD; METHODOLOGY; MIDWIFE; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT SAFETY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREGNANCY; PREVALENCE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; STANDARD; STATISTICS;

ADULT; FEMALE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; MEDICAL ERRORS; MEDICAL RECORDS; MIDWIFERY; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT SAFETY; PREGNANCY; PREVALENCE; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84872492351     PISSN: 02666138     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2011.10.013     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Allen S., Chiarella M., Homer C.S. Lessons learned from measuring safety culture: an Australian case study. Midwifery 2010, 26(5):497-503.
2. Amelink-Verburg M., Daemers D., Rijnders M. KNOV standaard Anaemie in de eerstelijns verloskundige praktijk [Anaemia in Primary Care Midwifery Practice] KNOV 2000.
3. Amelink-Verburg M., Verloove-Vanhorick S., Hakkenberg R., Veldhuijzen I., Bennebroek Gravenhorst J., Buitendijk S. Evaluation of 280000 cases in Dutch midwifery practices: a descriptive study. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2007, doi:10.111/j.1471-0528.2007.01580.x.21.
4. Berridge E.J., Mackintosh N.J., Freeth D.S. Supporting patient safety: examining communication within delivery suite teams through contrasting approaches to research observation. Midwifery 2010, 26(5):512-519.
5. Conquestor Mastering Finance, 2007. Utrecht: Report Practice Costs, Practice Income and Workload Primary Midwives.
6. CVZ Commissie Verloskunde Verloskundig Vademecum, 2003. Obstetric Manual 2003. College voor Zorgverzekeringen, Diemen, The Netherlands.
7. de Leeuw J.R.J., Veenhof C., Wagner C., et al. Patient Safety in Primary Care: State of Affairs 2008, NIVEL, Utrecht.
8. de Reu, P., 2009. Perinatal Mortality in the Netherlands: Perinatal Audit and Fetal Biometry. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Maastricht, The Netherlands.
9. Evers A., Brouwers H., Hukkelhoven C., et al. British Medical Journal 2010, 341:c5639. 10.1136/bmj.c5639.
10. Harmsen M., Gaal S., Dulmen V.S., et al. Patient safety in Dutch primary care: a study protocol. Implementation Science 2010, 5:50.
11. Hatem M., Sandall J., Devane D., Soltani H., Gates S. Midwife-led versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, 4. art. no.: CD004667. 10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub2.
12. Hodnett E., Gates S., Hofmeyer G., et al. Continuous support for women during childbirth. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003, (3). art. no. CD003766. 10.1002/14651858.CD003766.
13. Hodnett E.D., Downe S., Walsh D., Weston J. Alternative versus conventional institutional settings for birth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, 9. art. no. CD000012. 10.1002/14651858.CD000012.pub3.
14. Hoehler F. Bias and prevalence effects on kappa viewed in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2000, 53:499-503.
15. Lanting C.L., Buitendijk S.E., Crone M.R., et al. Clustering of Socioeconomic, Behavioral and Neonatal Risk Factors for Infant Health in Pregnant Smokers 2009, TNO, The Netherlands.
16. Lilford R.J., Mohammed M.A., Braunholz P., Hofer T.P. The measurement of active errors: methodological issues. BMJ Quality and Safety 2003, 12:ii8-ii12.
17. Linnaeus-PC Collaboration International Taxonomy of Medical Errors in Primary Care-Version 2 2002, The Robert Graham Center, Washington, DC.
18. Martijn, L.M., Jacobs, J.E., Harmsen, M., Maassen, I.M., Wensing, M. Patient safety in midwifery care for low risk women; instrument development. Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health. Accepted for publication.
19. NIVEL, 2009. Figures from the registration of midwives. Utrecht.
20. NZA, 2008. Tarievenlijst verloskunde Supplement 2 bij tariefbeschikking [Tariffs list Obstetric Supplement 2]. 5700-1900-09-1 16. December, Dutch Healthcare Authority, NZA Utrecht.
21. PRN Dutch Perinatal Registry: Perinatal Care in the Netherlands 2007.
22. PRN 2008 Dutch Perinatal Registry: Practice Analysis LVR1; Primary Midwifery Care 2009.
23. Rothschild J.M., Landrigan C.P., Cronin J.W., et al. The Critical Care Safety Study: the incidence and nature of adverse events and serious medical errors in intensive care. Journal of Critical Care 2010, 33(8):1694-1700.
24. Segaar, D., 2006. Adoption and Implementation of Smoking Cessation Support in Healthcare. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Maastricht, The Netherlands.
25. Sexton J.B., Helmreich R.L., Neilands T.B., et al. The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: psychometric properties, benchmarking data, and emerging research. BMC. Health Services Research 2006, 6:44.
26. Sinni S.V., Wallace E.M., Cross W.M. Patient safety: a literature review to inform an evaluation of a maternity service. Midwifery 2011, 27(6):e274-e278.
27. Smith A.H., Dixon A.L., Page L.A. Health care professionals' views about safety in maternity services: a qualitative study. Midwifery 2009, 25(1):21-31.
28. STIVORO, 2001. Midwifery Minimal Intervention Strategy Quit Smoking http://www.stivoro.nl.
29. Tsang C., Majeed A., Banarsee R., Gnani S., Aylin P. Recording of adverse events in English general practice: analysis of data from electronic patient records. Informatics in Primary Care 2010, 18(2):117-124.
30. van der Schaaf T.W., Habraken M.M.P. PRISMA Method Medical Version. A Short Description 2005, Faculteit Technologie Management/HPM Patiëntveiligheidssystemen, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Eindhoven.
31. VWS Task force Pregnancy and Birth: A Good Start, Safe Care for Pregnancy and Birth, 2009. Final Report, December.
32. Wetzels R., Wolters R., van Weel C., Wensing M. Mix of methods is needed to identify adverse events in general practice: a prospective observational study. BMC Family Practice 2008, 9:35.
33. World Health Organisation World Alliance for Patient Safety: The Conceptual Framework of an International Patient Safety Event Classification [Executive Summary] 2006, WHO, Copenhagen.