Supporting patient safety: Examining communication within delivery suite teams through contrasting approaches to research observation

Midwifery

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 512-519

  Berridge, Emma Jane ^a   Mackintosh, Nicola J ^b   Freeth, Della S ^c  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b KING'S COLLEGE HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^c QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Communication; Interprofessional; Observational research; Patient safety

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MEDICAL ERROR; MIDWIFE; NEWBORN; NURSE ATTITUDE; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT CARE; PREGNANCY; SAFETY; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADULT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH FACILITY ENVIRONMENT; HOSPITALS, MATERNITY; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MEDICAL ERRORS; MIDWIFERY; NURSE'S ROLE; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; PATIENT CARE TEAM; PREGNANCY; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; SAFETY MANAGEMENT; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77957013248     PISSN: 02666138     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2010.04.009     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Association of Perioperative Registered Nurses Perioperative Patient 'Hand Off' Toolkit 2010, AORN Inc., Denver, CO.
2. Audit Commission What Seems to be the Matter: Communication Between Hospitals and Patients 1993, HMSO, London.
3. Bales R.F. Interaction Process Analysis: a Method for the Study of Small Groups 1976, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
4. Becker F., Parsons K.M. Hospital facilities and the role of evidence-based design. Journal of Facilities Management 2007, 5:263-274.
5. Burke C.S., Salas E., Wilson-Donnelly K., Priest H. How to turn a team of experts into an expert medical team: guidance from the aviation and military communities. Quality and Safety in Health Care 2004, 13:i96-i104.
6. Catchpole K., De Leval M., Mcewan A., et al. Patient handover from surgery to intensive care: using Formula 1 pit-stop and aviation models to improve safety and quality. Pediatric Anesthesia 2007, 17:470-478.
7. Coe R., Gould D. Disagreement and aggression in the operating theatre. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2008, 61:609-618.
8. Commission for Health Improvement Maternity Services - Ashford & St Peters 2003, CHI, London.
9. Collins D. Multidisciplinary teamwork approach in labor and delivery and electronic fetal monitoring: a medical-legal perspective. Journal of Perinatal and Neonatal Nursing 2008, 22:125-132.
10. Conant L.H. Use of Bales' interaction process analysis to study nurse-patient interaction. Nursing Research 1965, 14:304-309.
11. Cooke N.J., Stout R., Salas E. A knowledge elicitation approach to the measurement of team situation awareness. New Trends in Cooperative Activities: Systems Dynamics in Complex Settings 2001, 114-139. Human Factors, Santa Monica, CA. M. McNeese, M. Endsley, E. Salas (Eds.).
12. de Vries E.N., Hollmann M.W., Smorenburg S.M., Gouma D.J., Boermeester M.A. Development and validation of the SURgical PAtient Safety System (SURPASS) checklist. Quality and Safety in Healthcare 2009, 18:121-126.
13. Department of Health Changing Childbirth, Part 1. Report of the Expert Maternity Group 1993, HMSO, London.
14. Department of Health, Design Council Design for Patient Safety 2003, HMSO, London.
15. Department of Health 2006 Annual Report of The Chief Medical Officer on the State of Public Health 2007, HMSO, London.
16. Endsley M.R. Theoretical underpinnings of situation awareness: a critical review. Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement 2000, 1-24. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. M.R. Endsley, D.J. Garland (Eds.).
17. Engeström Y., Engeström R., Vahaaho T. When the center does not hold: the importance of knotworking. Activity Theory and Social Practice: Cultural-Historical Approaches 1999, Aarhus University Press, Oxford. S. Chaiklin, M. Hedegaard, U.J. Juul (Eds.).
18. Engeström Y. From Teams to Knots: Activity-Theoretical Studies of Collaboration and Learning at Work. 2008, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York.
19. Fahy, P.J., 2006. Online and face-to-face group interaction processes compared using Bales' Interaction Process Analysis (IPA). European Journal of Open, Distance, and E-learning. (last accessed 20 January 2010). http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2006/Patrick_J_Fahy.htm.
20. Firth-Cozens J. Multidisciplinary teamwork: the good, bad, and everything in between. Quality in Health Care 2001, 10:65-66.
21. Fraser D., Symonds M., Cullen L., Symonds I. A university department merger of midwifery and obstetrics: a step on the journey to enhancing interprofessional learning. Medical Teacher 2000, 22:179-183.
22. Freeth D.S., Berridge E.J., Mackintosh N.M., 2008. Evaluation of safety culture and MOSES training in four delivery suites and two simulation centres: final report to the NPSA. 〈 (last accessed 28 January 2010). http://www1.city.ac.uk/communityandhealth/dps/EDU/moses.pdf.
23. Freemon B., Negrete V.F., Davis M., Korsch B.M. Gaps in doctor-patient communication: doctor-patient interaction analysis. Pediatric Research 1971, 5:298-311.
24. Hammersley M., Atkinson P. Ethnography: Principles in Practice 2007, Routledge, London. 3rd edn.
25. Haynes A.B., Weiser T.G., Berry W.R., et al. A surgical safety checklist to reduce mortality and morbidity in a global population. New England Journal of Medicine 2009, 360:491-499.
26. Healthcare Commission Investigation of the Maternity Service Provided by the Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust at New Cross Hospital 2004, Commission for Healthcare Audit and Inspection, London.
27. Healthcare Commission, 2006. Investigation into 10 Maternal Deaths at, or Following Delivery at, Northwick Park Hospital, North West London Hospitals NHS Trust, Between April 2002 and April 2005. Commission for Healthcare Audit and Inspection, London.
28. Healthcare Commission Towards Better Births 2008, Commission for Healthcare Audit and Inspection, London.
29. Healthcare Commission Learning from investigations 2008, Commission for Healthcare Audit and Inspection, London.
30. Hewett D.G., Watson B.M., Gallois C., Ward M., Leggett B.A. Intergroup communication between hospital doctors: implications for quality of patient care. Social Science and Medicine 2009, 69:1732-1740.
31. Hiltz S.R., Johnson K., Turoff M. Experiments in group decision making communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. Human Communication Research 1986, 13:225-252.
32. Leonard M., Graham S., Bonacum D. The human factor: the critical importance of effective teamwork and communication in providing safe care. Quality and Safety in Health Care13 2004, i85-i90.
33. Lewis G. Why Mothers Die 1997-1999: Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom 2001, RCOG, London.
34. Lewis G. Why Mothers Die 2000-2002: The Sixth Report of the Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom 2004, RCOG, London.
35. Lingard L., Regehr G., Orser B., et al. Evaluation of a preoperative checklist and team briefing among surgeons, nurses, and anesthesiologists to reduce failures in communication. Archives of Surgery 2008, 143:12-18.
36. Loxley A. Collaboration in Health and Welfare: Working with Difference 1997, Jessica Kingsley, London.
37. Mackintosh N., Berridge E.J., Freeth D. Supporting structures for team situation awareness and decision-making: insights from four delivery suites. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2009, 15:46-54.
38. Manstead A.S.R., Hewstone M. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Psychology 1996, Blackwell, Oxford.
39. Nam C.S., Lyons J.B., Hwang H.S., Kim S. The process of team communication in multi-cultural contexts: an empirical study using Bales' interaction process analysis (IPA). International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 2009, 39:771-782.
40. National Patient Safety Agency Recognising and Responding Appropriately to Early Signs of Deterioration in Hospitalised Patients. NPSA 2007.
41. O'Neill O. Safe Births: Everybody's Business. 2008, King's Fund, London.
42. Ovretveit J. The contribution of new social science research to patient safety. Social Science and Medicine 2009, 69:1780-1783.
43. Pope C., Mays N. Critical reflections on the rise of qualitative research. British Medical Journal 2009, 339:b3425.
44. Reeves S., Rice K., Gotlib L., et al. Interprofessional interaction, negotiation and non-negotiation on general internal medicine wards. Journal of Interprofessional Care 2009, 23:633-645.
45. Reiling J. Creating a culture of patient safety through innovative hospital design. Advances in Patient Safety: From Research to Implementation. Vol. 2, Concepts and Methodology 2005, AHRQ Publication No. 05-0021-2. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. K. Henriksen, J.B. Battles, E.S. Marks, D.I. Lewin (Eds.).
46. Roter D.L. Patient participation in the patient-provider interaction: the effects of patient question asking on the quality of interaction, satisfaction and compliance. Health Education Monographs 1977, 5:281-315.
47. Roter D.L. The Roter Method of Interaction Process Analysis RIAS Manual 1991, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
48. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Royal College of Midwives Communication Standards - Obstetrics. Report of the Audit Committee's Working Group 1995, RCOG, London.
49. Rowe R.E., Garcia J., MacFarlane A.J., Davidson L.L. Does poor communication contribute to stillbirths and infant deaths? A review. Journal of Public Health 2001, 23:23-24.
50. Rowe R.E., Garcia J., MacFarlane A.J., Davidson L.L. Improving communication between health professionals and women in maternity care: a structured review. Health Expectations 2002, 5:63-83.
51. Strauss A. Negotiation: Varieties, Contexts, Processes and Social Order 1978, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
52. Symonds I., Cullen L., Fraser D. Evaluation of a formative interprofessional team objective structured clinical examination (ITOSCE): a method of shared learning in maternity education. Medical Teacher 2003, 25:38-41.
53. Vaughan D. The dark side of organizations: mistake, misconduct, and disaster. Annual Review of Sociology 1999, 25:271-305.
54. Vincent C. Social scientists and patient safety: critics or contributors?. Social Science and Medicine 2009, 69:1777-1779.
55. Waring J. Getting to the 'roots' of patient safety. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2007, 19:257-258.
56. Wasserman R.C., Inui T.S. Systematic analysis of clinician-patient interactions: a critique of recent approaches with suggestions for future research. Medical Care 1983, 21:279-293.
57. White A., Pichert J., Bledsoe S., Irwin C., Entman S. Cause and effect analysis of closed claims in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2005, 105:1031-1038.
58. Williams S., Weinman.J., Dale J. Doctor-patient communication and patient satisfaction: a review. Family Practice 1998, 15:480-492.
59. Wind G. Negotiated interactive observation: doing fieldwork in hospital settings. Anthropology and Medicine 2008, 15:79-89.