Electrical resistivity characterization and defect detection on a geosynthetic clay liner (GCL) on an experimental site

Journal of Applied Geophysics

Volumn 90, Issue , 2013, Pages 19-26

  Sirieix, C ^a   Fernandez Martinez J L ^b   Riss, J ^a   Genelle, F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX   (France)

^b Área de Matemática Aplicada   (Spain)

Author keywords

Electrical resistivity; GCL; Landfill cover; Particle swarm optimization; Tomography; VES

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL DAMAGES; DC ELECTRICAL; DEFECT DETECTION; DIPOLE-DIPOLE; ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY; ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY TOMOGRAPHY; ENGINEERED DEFECTS; EQUIVALENCE RULE; GCL; GEOELECTRICAL PROPERTIES; GEOSYNTHETIC CLAY LINERS; HIGH RESISTIVITY; LANDFILL COVERS; METEOROLOGICAL CONDITION; POSTERIOR DISTRIBUTIONS; PSO(PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION); SATURATION CONDITIONS; SCHLUMBERGER; VERTICAL ELECTRICAL SOUNDING; VES;

DEFECTS; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; INVERSION LAYERS; LAND FILL; PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION (PSO); TOMOGRAPHY;

ELECTRIC PROSPECTING;

CLAY LINER; DAMAGE; DETECTION METHOD; ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GEOELECTRIC FIELD; GEOPHYSICAL ARRAY; GEOSYNTHETICS; IMAGING METHOD; LANDFILL; OPTIMIZATION; PERMEABILITY; VERTICAL ELECTRICAL SOUNDING;

EID: 84872467303     PISSN: 09269851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2012.12.005     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Allen R.G., Pereira L.S., Raes D., Smith M. Crop evaporatranspiration: guidelines for computing crop water requirements. F.A.O. irrigation and drainage 1998, (326 pp.).
2. Beck A. Technical improvements in dipole geoelectric survey methods. Symposium on Geosynthetics (GEOFRONTIERS), Dallas, USA 2011, 10.1061/41165(397)290.
3. Bouazza A. Geosynthetic clay liners. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 2002, 20:3-17.
4. Bouazza A., Jefferis S., Vangpaisal T. Investigation of the effects and degree of calcium exchange on the Atterberg limits and swelling of geosynthetic clay liners when subjected to wet-dry cycles. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 2007, 25:170-185.
5. Boudreault J.P., Dube J.S., Chouteau M., Winiarski T., Hardy E. Geophysical characterization of contaminated urban fills. Engineering Geology 2010, 116:196-206.
6. Carpenter P.J., Calkin S.F., Kaufmann R.S. Assessing a fractured landfill cover using electrical resistivity and seismic refraction techniques. Geophysics 1991, 56:1896-1904.
7. Cassiani G., Fusi N., Susanni D., Deiana R. Vertical radar profiling for the assessment of landfill capping effectiveness. Near Surface Geophysics 2008, 6:133-142.
8. Chambers J.E., Kuras O., Meldrum P.I., Ogilvy R.D., Hollands J. Electrical resistivity tomography applied to geologic, hydrogeologic, and engineering investigations at a former waste-disposal site. Geophysics 2006, 71:231-239.
9. Clément R., Oxarango L., Descloitres M. Contribution of 3-D time-lapse ERT to the study of leachate recirculation in a landfill. Waste Management 2011, 31:457-467.
10. Colucci P., Darilek G.T., Laine D.L., Binley A. Locating landfill leaks covered with waste. Symposium on Waste Management and Landfill, Cagliari, Italy 1999.
11. Comité Français des Géosynthétiques Recommandations pour l'utilisation des géosynthétiques bentonitiques en installations de stockage de déchets 2011, (84 pp.).
12. Dahlin T., Zhou B. A numerical comparison of 2D resistivity imaging with 10 electrode arrays. Geophysical Prospecting 2004, 52(5):379-398.
13. Egloffstein T.A. Natural bentonites-influence of the ion exchange and partial dessication on permeability and self-healing capacity of bentonites used in GCL. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 2001, 19:427-444.
14. Fernández Martínez J.L., García Gonzalo E. The generalized PSO: a new door to PSO evolution. Journal for Artificial Evolution and Applications 2008, (Special Issue on Particle swarms: the second decade. Article ID 861275, 15 pages). 10.1155/2008/861275.
15. Fernández Martínez J.L., García Gonzalo E. The PSO family: deduction, stochastic analysis and comparison, swarm intelligence. Special Issue on Particle Swarm Optimization 2009, 3-4:245-273.
16. Fernández Martínez J.L., García Gonzalo E., Fernández Alvarez J.P., Kuzma H., Menéndez Pérez C.O. PSO: a powerful algorithm to solve geophysical inverse problems. Application to a 1D-DC resistivity case. Journal of Applied Geophysics 2010, 71-1:13-15.
17. Fernández Martínez J.L., Fernández Muñiz Z., Tompkins Michael J. On the topography of the cost functional in linear and nonlinear inverse problems. Geophysics 2012, 77(W1). 10.1190/geo2011-0341.1.
18. Fernández-Martínez J., García-Gonzalo L., Mukerji T. How to design a powerful family of particle swarm optimizers for inverse modelling. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control 2011, 1-15. 10.1177/0142331211402900.
19. Forget B., Rollin A.L., Jacquelin T. Lessons learned from 10years of leak detection surveys on geomembrane. Symposium on Waste Management and Landfill, Sardinia, Italy 2005.
20. Gallas J.D.F., Taioli F., Filho W.M. Induced polarization, resistivity, and self-potential: a case history of a contamination evaluation due to landfill leakage. Environmental Earth Sciences 2010, 63:251-261. (ISSN: 1866-6280).
21. Genelle, F. 2012. Les méthodes géophysiques pour la caractérisation des couvertures d'installation de stockage de déchets. Thèse de l'Université Bordeaux 1. 366 pp. http://www.theses.fr/16370595X.
22. Genelle F., Sirieix C., Naudet V., Riss J., Naessens F., Renié S., Dubearnes B., Bégassat P., Trillaud S., Dabas M. Geophysical methods applied to characterize landfill covers with geocomposite. Symposium on Geosynthetics (GEOFRONTIERS), Dallas, USA 2011, 10.1061/41165(397)199.
23. Genelle F., Sirieix C., Riss, Naudet V. Monitoring landfill cover by electrical resistivity tomography on an experimental site. Engineering Geology 2012, 145:18-29.
24. Grellier S., Guérin R., Robain H., Bobachev A., Vermeersch F., Tabbagh A. Monitoring of leachate recirculation in a bioreactor landfill by 2D electrical resistivity imaging. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics 2008, 13:351-359.
25. Guérin R., Bégassat P., Benderitter Y., David J., Tabbagh A., Thiry M. Geophysical study of the industrial waste land in Mortagne-du-Nord (France) using electrical resistivity. Near Surface Geophysics 2004, 3:137-143.
26. Guyonnet D., Gourry J.-C., Bertrand L., Amraoui N. Heterogeneity detection in an experimental clay liner. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 2003, 40(1):149-160.
27. Hansen R., Beck A. Electrical leak location surveys for landfill caps. Symposium on the Perspective on Environmental and Water Resources (Environmental and Water Resources Institute Conference), Bangkok, Thailand 2009.
28. Journal Officiel de la République Française Arrêté du 18 décembre 1992 relatif au stockage de certains déchets industriels spéciaux ultimes et stabilisés pour les installations existantes 1993, (30 mars).
29. Kumar R., Das U.C. Transformation of dipole to Schlumberger sounding curves by means of digital linear filters. Geophysical Prospecting 1977, 25:780-789.
30. Laine D.L., Binley A.M., Darilek G.T. Locating geomembrane liner leaks under waste in a landfill. Symposium on Geosynthetics, Long Beach California, USA 1997.
31. Leroux V., Dahlin T., Svensson M. Dense resistivity and induced polarization profiling for a landfill restoration project at Härlöv, Southern Sweden. Waste Management & Research 2007, 25:49-60.
32. Loke M.H. Tutorial: 2-D and 3-D Electrical Imaging Surveys 2004, Pdf document.
33. Loke M.H., Barker R.D. Least-squares deconvolution of apparent resistivity pseudosections. Geophysics 1995, 60(6):1682-1690.
34. Loke M.H., Acworth Ian, Dahlin T. A comparison of smooth and blocky inversion methods in 2D electrical imaging surveys. Exploration Geophysics 2003, 34:182-187.
35. Maillet R. The fundamental equations of electrical prospecting. Geophysics 1947, 12:529-556.
36. Naudet V., Revil A., Rizzo E., Bottero J.-Y., Bégassat P. Groundwater redox conditions and conductivity in a contaminant plume from geoelectrical investigations. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 2004, 8:8-22.
37. Ogilvy R.D., Meldrum P.I., Chambers J.E., Williams G. The use of 3D electrical resistivity tomography to characterise waste and leachate distributions within a closed landfill, Thriplow, UK. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics 2002, 7:11-18.
38. Patella D. On the transformation of dipole to Schlumberger sounding curves. Geophysical Prospecting 1974, 22:315-329.
39. Peter-Borie M., Sirieix C., Naudet V., Riss J. Electrical resistivity monitoring with buried electrodes and cables: noise estimation with repeatability test. Near Surface Geophysics 2011, 9:369-380.
40. Rayhani M.T., Rowe R.K., Brachman R.W.I., Take W.A., Siemens G. Factors affecting GCL hydration under isothermal conditions. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 2011, 29:525-533.
41. United Nations Environment Programme Solid waste management. Chapter III: Waste Quantities and Characteristics 2005, 31-38. (http://www.unep.or.jp/Ietc/Publications/spc/Solid_Waste_Management/inde x.asp).
42. Vaudelet P., Schmutz M., Pessel M., Franceschi M., Guérin R., Atteia O., Blondel A., Ngomseu C., Galaup S., Rejiba F., Bégassat P. Mapping of contaminant plumes with geoelectrical methods. A case study in urban context. Journal of Applied Geophysics 2011, 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.09.023.
43. White C.C., Barker R.D. Electrical leak detection system for landfill liners: a case history. Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation 1997, 17(3):153-159.
44. Wolke R., Schwetlick H. Iteratively reweighted least squares algorithms convergence analysis and numerical comparisons. SIAM Journal of Scientific and Statistical Computations 1988, 9:907-921.