Induced polarization, resistivity, and self-potential: A case history of contamination evaluation due to landfill leakage

Environmental Earth Sciences

Volumn 63, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 251-261

  Gallas, José Domingos Faraco ^a   Taioli, Fabio ^a   Filho, Walter Malagutti ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Environmental geophysics; Induced polarization; Resistivity; Self potential

Indexed keywords

CASE HISTORY; CONTAMINATION PLUME; ELECTRICAL CURRENT FLOW; ENVIRONMENTAL GEOPHYSICS; FLOW DIRECTION; INDUCED POLARIZATION; IONIC CHARGE; IONIC CONCENTRATIONS; LANDFILL LEAKAGE; PREFERENTIAL FLOWS; RESISTIVITY; RESISTIVITY SURVEYS; RESISTIVITY VALUES; SELF-POTENTIAL; TROPICAL ENVIRONMENTS;

ELECTRIC CURRENTS; GEOPHYSICS; GROUNDWATER FLOW; LAND FILL; WASTE DISPOSAL;

POLARIZATION;

CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); ELECTRIC FIELD; ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY; INDUCED POLARIZATION; LANDFILL; LEAKAGE; MEMBRANE; PLUME; PREFERENTIAL FLOW; SELF POTENTIAL; TROPICAL ENVIRONMENT;

EID: 79955071697     PISSN: 18666280     EISSN: 18666299     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-010-0696-y     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Archie GE (1942) The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. Trans AIME 146: 54-64.
2. Bertin J, Loeb J (1976) Experimental and theoretical aspects of induced polarization. Gebruder Borntraeger, v. 1. Geopublication Associates, Berlin-Stuttgart, p 250.
3. Cole KS, Cole RH (1941) Dispersion and absorption in dielectrics. 1 Alternating current fields. J Chem Phys 9: 341.
4. deGroot-Hedlin C, Constable S (1990) Occam's inversion to generate smooth, two-dimensional models form magnetotelluric data. Geophysics 55(12): 1613-1624.
5. Edwards LS (1977) A modified pseudosection for resistivity and induced-polarization. Geophysics 42(5): 1020-1036.
6. Elis VR (1999) Avaliação da aplicabilidade de métodos elétricos de prospecção geofísica no estudo de áreas utilizadas para disposição de resíduos. Tese de Doutorado, Instituto de Geociências e Ciências Exatas, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Rio Claro, p 264.
7. Gallas JDF (2000) Principais métodos geoelétricos e suas aplicações em prospecção mineral, hidrogeologia, geologia de engenharia e geologia ambiental. Tese de Doutorado, Instituto de Geociências e Ciências Exatas, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Rio Claro, p 174.
8. Gallas JDF, Malagutti Filho W (2001) O método do potencial espontâneo (SP) na detecção de infiltrações em barragens. In: Anais (CD-ROM) Congresso Internacional da Sociedade Brasileira de Geofísica, Salvador.
9. Gallas JDF, Malagutti Filho W, Prado RL, Taioli F (2003) Lixão do Alvarenga-Mapeamento da pluma de contaminação pelos métodos geoelétricos. In: Anais CD-ROM Congresso Internacional da Sociedade Brasileira de Geofísica, Rio de Janeiro.
10. Godio A, Naldi M (2003) Two-dimensional electrical imaging for detection of hydrocarbon contaminants. Eur Assoc Geosci Eng Near Surf Geophys 1: 131-137.
11. Grahame SA (1947) The electrical double layer and the theory of electrocapillarity. Chem Rev 41: 441-501.
12. Hallof PG (1957) On the interpretation of resistivity and induced polarization measurements. PhD Thesis, MIT.
13. Keller GV, Frischknecht FC (1977) Electrical methods in geophysical prospecting. Pergamon Press, Oxford, p 517.
14. Klein JD, Shuey RT (1978a) Nonlinear impedance of mineral-electrolyte interface: Part I. Pyrite. Geophysics 43(6): 1222-1234.
15. Klein JD, Shuey RT (1978b) Nonlinear impedance of mineral-electrolyte interface: Part II. Galena, chalcopyrite, and graphite. Geophysics 43(6): 1235-1249.
16. Loke MH, Barker RD (1996a) Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections by a quasi-Newton method. Geophys Prospect 44(1): 131-152.
17. Loke MH, Barker RD (1996b) Practical techniques for 3D resistivity surveys and data inversion. Geophys Prospect 44(3): 499-523.
18. Nascimento CTC, Koide S, Pires ACB, Mello GA (1999) Pseudo-seções elétricas na avaliação da contaminação do subsolo. Revista Brasileira de Geociências 29(4): 621-626.
19. Ogilvy R, Meldrum P, Chambers J, Williams G (2002) The use of 3D electrical resistivity tomography to characterize waste and leachate distribution within a closed landfill, Thriplow, UK. J Environ Eng Geophys 7(1): 11-18.
20. Orellana E (1972) Prospeccion geoeletrica en corriente continua. Paraninfo, Madrid, p 523.
21. RES2DINV ver. 3. 54 (2004) Rapid 2-D resistivity and IP inversion using the least-squares method. Geoelectric Imaging 2-D and 3D. Geotomo Software, Malaysia.
22. Roy KK, Elliot HM (1980) Model studies on some aspects of resistivity and membrane polarization behavior over a layered earth. Geophys Prospect 28(5): 759-775.
23. Seaton WJ, Burbey TJ (2002) Evaluation of two-dimensional resistivity methods in a fractured crystalline-rock terrane. J Appl Geophys 51: 21-41.
24. Silva JTC (2003) Métodos geoelétricos em apoio ao mapeamento de contaminação por esgotos domésticos em Salesópolis, SP. Trabalho de formatura, Instituto de Geociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, p 39.
25. Soupios P, Papadopoulos N, Papadopoulos I, Valianatos F, Sarris A, Manios T (2007) Application of integrated methods in mapping waste disposal areas. Environ Geol 53(1): 661-675.
26. Sumner JS (1976) Principles of induced polarization for geophysical exploration. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co, New York, p 277.
27. Telford WM, Geldart LP, Sheriff RE (1990) Applied geophysics, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 770.
28. Varnier C, Hirata R (2002) Contaminação da água subterrânea por nitrato no Parque Ecológico do Tietê-São Paulo, Brasil. Revista Águas Subterrâneas 16: 77-82.
29. Vega de la M, Osella A, Lascano E (2003) Joint inversion of Wenner and dipole-dipole data to study a gasoline-contaminated soil. J Appl Geophys 54: 97-109.
30. Ward SH (1990) Resistivity and induced polarization methods. Geotechnical and Environmental Geophysics. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, v. 1: Review and Tutorial, pp 147-189.