What E-patients want from the doctor-patient relationship: Content analysis of posts on discussion boards

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2012, Pages

  Hewitt Taylor, Jaqui ^a   Bond, Carol S ^a  

^a BOURNEMOUTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Consumer health informatics; Ehealth; Participatory medicin; Physician patient relations

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; DIABETES MELLITUS; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HUMAN; INTERNET; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SELF CARE; SELF CONCEPT;

DIABETES MELLITUS; HUMANS; INTERNET; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; POWER (PSYCHOLOGY); SELF CARE; SELF EFFICACY;

EID: 84872466204     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14388871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2196/jmir.2068     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. British Medical Association. Improving the Management of Long-Term Conditions in the Face of System Reform. London: Health Policy and Economic Research Unit, BMA; 2006.
2. UK Department of Health. The Expert Patient: A New Approach to Chronic Disease Management for the 21st Century. London: Department of Health; 2001. URL: http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/ PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH-4006801 [accessed 2012-11-08] [WebCite Cache ID 6C1DjeSvY].
3. UK Department of Health. Our Health, Our Care, Our Say: A New Direction for Community Services. Norwich, UK: The Stationery Office; 2006. URL: http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/ PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH-4127602 [accessed 2012-11-08] [WebCite Cache ID 6C1DoNwxR].
4. Badcott D. The expert patient: valid recognition or false hope? Med Health Care Philos 2005;8(2):173-178. [doi: 10.1007/s11019-005-2275-7] [Medline: 16215797]. (Pubitemid 41086325)
5. Kirk S, Glendinning C, Callery P. Parent or nurse? The experience of being the parent of a technology-dependent child. J Adv Nurs 2005 Sep;51(5):456-464. [doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03522.x] [Medline: 16098162]. (Pubitemid 41190762)
6. Hewitt-Taylor J. Children With Complex and Continuing Health Needs: The Experiences of Children, Families and Care Staff. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 2007.
7. UK Department of Health. Supporting People with Long Term Conditions: An NHS and Social Care Model to support local innovation and integration. Leeds: Department of Health; 2005. URL: http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/ Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH-4100252 [accessed 2012-11-08] [WebCite Cache ID 6C1DvDyuC].
8. Goodyear-Smith F, Buetow S. Power issues in the doctor-patient relationship. Health Care Anal 2001;9(4):449-462. [doi: 10.1023/A:1013812802937] [Medline: 11874258]. (Pubitemid 34123643)
9. Tweeddale M. Grasping the nettle-what to do when patients withdraw their consent for treatment: (a clinical perspective on the case of Ms B). J Med Ethics 2002 Aug;28(4):236-237 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 12161576].
10. Donaldson L. Expert patients usher in a new era of opportunity for the NHS. BMJ 2003 Jun 14;326(7402):1279-1280 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7402.1279] [Medline: 12805129].
11. van Dulmen S, Sluijs E, van Dijk L, de Ridder D, Heerdink R, Bensing J, International Expert Forum on Patient Adherence. Furthering patient adherence: a position paper of the international expert forum on patient adherence based on an internet forum discussion. BMC Health Serv Res 2008;8:47 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-47] [Medline: 18304337].
12. Ahmad F, Hudak P, Bercovitz K, Hollenberg E, Levinson W. Are physicians ready for patients with Internet-based health information? J Med Internet Res 2006;8(3):e22 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.3.e22] [Medline: 17032638].
13. Society for Participatory Medicine. 2011. Bringing together e-patients and health care professionals URL: http://participatorymedicine.org/about/ [accessed 2012-11-04] [WebCite Cache ID 6BvmCuRoN].
14. e-patients.net. 2012. About us URL: http://e-patients.net/about-e- patientsnet [accessed 2012-11-04] [WebCite Cache ID 6BvmPYwr2].
15. Fox S. The engaged e-patient population. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2008. URL: http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media// Files/Reports/2008/PIP-Health-Aug08.pdf.pdf [accessed 2012-11-08] [WebCite Cache ID 6C1cnJQdZ].
16. Glasgow R, Nelson C, Kearney K, Reid R, Ritzwoller D, Strecher V, et al. Reach, engagement, and retention in an Internet-based weight loss program in a multi-site randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2007;9(2):e11 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.2.e11] [Medline: 17513282]. (Pubitemid 47450389)
17. Richardson C, Buis L, Janney A, Goodrich D, Sen A, Hess M, et al. An online community improves adherence in an internet-mediated walking program. Part 1: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2010;12(4):e71 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1338] [Medline: 21169160].
18. Hartzler A, Pratt W. Managing the personal side of health: how patient expertise differs from the expertise of clinicians. J Med Internet Res 2011;13(3):e62 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1728] [Medline: 21846635].
19. Hookway N. 'Entering the blogosphere': some strategies for using blogs in social research. Qual Res 2008;8(1):91-113. [doi: 10.1177/146879410708529].
20. Kierkegaard S. Twitter thou doeth? Computer Law and Security Review 2010;26(6):577-594.
21. Snee H. Web 2.0 as a Social Science Research Tool. 2008 Nov. URL: http://www.restore.ac.uk/orm/futures/Web-2.0-final-v3.pdf [accessed 2012-11-06] [WebCite Cache ID 6ByYWmHnD].
22. Snee H. Realities Toolkit 10: Using Blog Analysis. Manchester, UK: ESRC National Centre for Research Methods; 2010.
23. Rodham K, Gavin J. The ethics of using the Internet to collect qualitative research data. Res Ethics Rev 2006;2(3):83-116.
24. Hadert A, Rodham K. The invisible reality of arthritis: a qualitative analysis of an online message board. Musculoskeletal Care 2008 Sep;6(3):181-196. [doi: 10.1002/msc.131] [Medline: 18570188].
25. Pestello F, Davis-Berman J. Taking anti-depressant medication: A qualitative examination of internet postings. Journal of Mental Health 2008;17(4):349-360. [doi: 10.1080/09638230701498333].
26. Battles H. Exploring ethical and methodological issues in internet-based research with adolescents. Int J Qual Methods 2010;9(1):27-39.
27. Joffe S, Manocchia M, Weeks J, Cleary P. What do patients value in their hospital care? An empirical perspective on autonomy centred bioethics. J Med Ethics 2003 Apr;29(2):103-108 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 12672891]. (Pubitemid 36504106)
28. Sullivan M. The new subjective medicine: taking the patient's point of view on health care and health. Soc Sci Med 2003 Apr;56(7):1595-1604. [Medline: 12614708]. (Pubitemid 36279491)
29. Protheroe J, Fahey T, Montgomery A, Peters T. The impact of patients' preferences on the treatment of atrial fibrillation: observational study of patient based decision analysis. BMJ 2000 May 20;320(7246):1380-1384 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 10818030]. (Pubitemid 30261119)
30. Coulter A. After Bristol: putting patients at the centre. BMJ 2002 Mar 16;324(7338):648-651 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 11895824]. (Pubitemid 34234970)
31. Mandana V. The impact of health communication on health-related decision making: A review of evidence. Health Educ 2007;107(1):27-41.
32. Sackett D, Rosenberg W, Gray J, Haynes R, Richardson W. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ 1996 Jan 13;312(7023):71-72 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 8555924].
33. DiCenso A, Cullum N, Ciliska D. Implementing evidence based nursing: some misconceptions. Evidence-Based Nursing 1998;1:38-39. [doi: 10.1136/ebn.1.2.38].
34. Matthews S, Peden A, Rowles G. Patient-provider communication: understanding diabetes management among adult females. Patient Educ Couns 2009 Jul;76(1):31-37. [doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.11.022] [Medline: 19157762].