Evaluation of end-user satisfaction among employees participating in a web-based health risk assessment with tailored feedback

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2012, Pages

  Vosbergen, Sandra ^a   Laan, Eva K ^a,b   Colkesen, Ersen B ^a,b   Niessen, Maurice A J ^b   Kraaijenhagen, Roderik A ^b   Essink Bot, Marie Louise ^a   Peek, Niels ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b NDDO Institute for Prevention and Early Diagnostics NIPED   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

EHealth; Health behavior; Health risk assessment; Mixed methods; Satisfaction

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EVALUATION; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; INTERNET; LIFESTYLE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RISK ASSESSMENT;

HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; INTERNET; LIFE STYLE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84872439657     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14388871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2196/jmir.2067     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Soler RE, Leeks KD, Razi S, Hopkins DP, Griffith M, Aten A, Task Force on Community Preventive Services. A systematic review of selected interventions for worksite health promotion. The assessment of health risks with feedback. Am J Prev Med 2010 Feb;38(2 Suppl):S237-S262. [doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.10.030] [Medline: 20117610].
2. Health Education Authority. Action on Health at Work. London, UK: HEA 1993.
3. Wilson MG, Holman PB, Hammock A. A comprehensive review of the effects of worksite health promotion on health-related outcomes. Am J Health Promot 1996;10(6):429-435. [Medline: 10163309].
4. Faculty of Public Health Medicine Committee on Health Promotion. Health Promotion in the Workplace. Guidelines for Health Promotion No. 40. London, UK: Royal College of Physicians; 1995.
5. Brug J, Oenema A, Campbell M. Past, present, and future of computer-tailored nutrition education. Am J Clin Nutr 2003 Apr;77(4 Suppl):1028S-1034S [FREE Full text] [Medline: 12663313].
6. Kreuter MW, Bull FC, Clark EM, Oswald DL. Understanding how people process health information: a comparison of tailored and nontailored weight-loss materials. Health Psychol 1999 Sep;18(5):487-494. [Medline: 10519465].
7. Franklin PD, Rosenbaum PF, Carey MP, Roizen MF. Using sequential e-mail messages to promote health behaviors: evidence of feasibility and reach in a worksite sample. J Med Internet Res 2006;8(1):e3 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.1.e3] [Medline: 16585028].
8. Riper H, Kramer J, Smit F, Conijn B, Schippers G, Cuijpers P. Web-based self-help for problem drinkers: a pragmatic randomized trial. Addiction 2008 Feb;103(2):218-227. [doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.02063.x] [Medline: 18199300].
9. Aoki N, Dunn K, Johnson-Throop KA, Turley JP. Outcomes and methods in telemedicine evaluation. Telemed J E Health 2003;9(4):393-401. [doi: 10.1089/153056203772744734] [Medline: 14980098].
10. Mair F, Whitten P. Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine. BMJ 2000 Jun 3;320(7248):1517-1520. [Medline: 10834899].
11. Chung M, Melnyk P, Blue D, Renaud D, Breton MC. Worksite health promotion: the value of the Tune Up Your Heart program. Popul Health Manag 2009 Dec;12(6):297-304. [doi: 10.1089/pop.2008.0044] [Medline: 20038255].
12. Nguyen HQ, Carrieri-Kohlman V, Rankin SH, Slaughter R, Stulbarg MS. Internet-based patient education and support interventions: a review of evaluation studies and directions for future research. Comput Biol Med 2004 Mar;34(2):95-112. [doi: 10.1016/S0010-4825(03)00046-5] [Medline: 14972630].
13. Renaud L, Kishchuk N, Juneau M, Nigam A, Téreault K, Leblanc MC. Implementation and outcomes of a comprehensive worksite health promotion program. Can J Public Health 2008;99(1):73-77. [Medline: 18435397].
14. Liau SY, Hassali MA, Shafie AA, Ibrahim MI. Assessing quality of a worksite health promotion programme from participants' views: findings from a qualitative study in Malaysia. Health Expect 2011 Nov 3. [doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00742.x] [Medline: 22050457].
15. Pascoe GC. Patient satisfaction in primary health care: a literature review and analysis. Eval Program Plann 1983;6(3-4):185-210. [Medline: 10299618].
16. Colkesen EB, Niessen MA, Peek N, Vosbergen S, Kraaijenhagen RA, van Kalken CK, et al. Initiation of health-behaviour change among employees participating in a web-based health risk assessment with tailored feedback. J Occup Med Toxicol 2011;6:5 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/1745-6673-6-5] [Medline: 21388524].
17. Marshall AL. Challenges and opportunities for promoting physical activity in the workplace. J Sci Med Sport 2004 Apr;7(1 Suppl):60-66. [Medline: 15214603].
18. Wixom BH, Todd PA. A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance. Information Systems Research 2005;16(1):85. [doi: 10.1287/isre.1050.0042].
19. Johnson B, Onwuegbuzie, AJ. Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come. Educational Researcher 2004 Oct;33(7):14-26. [doi: 10.3102/0013189X033007014].
20. Laan EK, Kraaijenhagen RA, Peek N, Busschers WB, Deutekom M, Bossuyt PM, et al. Effectiveness of a web-based health risk assessment with individually-tailored feedback on lifestyle behaviour: study protocol. BMC Public Health 2012;12:200 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-200] [Medline: 22429308].
21. Burgers JS, Simoons ML, Hoes AW, Stehouwer CD, Stalman WA. [Guideline 'Cardiovascular Risk Management']. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2007 May 12;151(19):1068-1074. [Medline: 17552415].
22. Graham I, Atar D, Borch-Johnsen K, Boysen G, Burell G, Cifkova R, European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG). European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: executive summary: Fourth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice. Eur Heart J 2007 Oct;28(19):2375-2414 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm316] [Medline: 17726041].
23. Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot 1997;12(1):38-48. [Medline: 10170434].
24. Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, Lobach DF. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ 2005 Apr 2;330(7494):765. [doi: 10.1136/bmj.38398.500764.8F] [Medline: 15767266].
25. Bickmore T, Gruber A, Picard R. Establishing the computer-patient working alliance in automated health behavior change interventions. Patient Educ Couns 2005 Oct;59(1):21-30. [doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.09.008] [Medline: 16198215].
26. Wolff LS, Massett HA, Weber D, Mockenhaupt RE, Hassmiller S, Maibach EW. Opportunities and barriers to disease prevention counseling in the primary care setting: a multisite qualitative study with US health consumers. Health Promot Int 2010 Sep;25(3):265-276 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1093/heapro/daq030] [Medline: 20413404].
27. Asch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christakis NA. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol 1997 Oct;50(10):1129-1136. [Medline: 9368521].
28. Sitzia J, Wood N. Response rate in patient satisfaction research: an analysis of 210 published studies. Int J Qual Health Care 1998 Aug;10(4):311-317 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 9835247].
29. Jones R, Pitt N. Health surveys in the workplace: comparison of postal, email and World Wide Web methods. Occup Med (Lond) 1999 Nov;49(8):556-558 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 10658310].
30. Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press; 2003.
31. Colkesen EB, Kraaijenhagen RA, Frings-Dresen MH, Sluiter JK, van Kalken CK, Tijssen JG, et al. Participation in a workplace web-based health risk assessment program. Occup Med (Lond) 2011 Dec;61(8):586-589. [doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqr122] [Medline: 21891778].