A SCOR based approach for measuring a benchmarkable supply chain performance

Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 113-132

  Kocaoǧlu, Batuhan ^a   Gülsün, Bahadir ^b   Tanyaş, Mehmet ^c  

^a ERP Department   (Turkey)

^b YILDIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c MALTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

AHP; Normalization; Performance measures; SCOR model; Supply chain management; TOPSIS

Indexed keywords

AHP; NORMALIZATION; PERFORMANCE MEASURE; SCOR MODELS; TOPSIS;

HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; INDUSTRY; MANAGEMENT; MANAGERS;

SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84872395499     PISSN: 09565515     EISSN: 15728145     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10845-011-0547-z     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Akkermans, H., & Oorschot, K. V. (2002). Developing a balanced scorecard with system dynamics. In Proceeding of 2002 international system dynamics conference.
2. Alvarado K., Rabelo L., Moraga R., Quijada S. O., Gruber F., Sepulveda J. (2007) Application of SCOR to e-government: A case study. International Journal of Simulation and Process Modelling 3(3): 99-114
3. Ayers J. (2001) Handbook of supply chain management. St. Lucie Press and APICS, USA
4. Banker R. D., Chang H., Janakiraman S. N., Konstans C. (2004) A balanced scorecard analysis of performance metrics. European Journal of Operational Research 154(2): 423-436
5. Bhagwat R., Sharma M. K. (2007) Performance measurement of supply chain management: A balanced scorecard approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering 53: 43-62
6. Bolstroff P. (2002) How does SCOR measure up?. Keeping SCOR 3: 22-25
7. Brans P., Vincke P., Mareschal B. (1986) How to select and how to rank projects: The promethee method. European Journal of Operational Research 24: 228-238
8. Chan F. T. S. (2003) Interactive selection model for supplier selection process an AHP. International Journal of Production Research 41: 3549-3579
9. Chan F. T. S., Qi H. J. (2002) A fuzzy basis channel-spanning performance measurement method for supply chain management. Proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture 216: 1155- 1167
10. Chan F. T. S., Qi H. J. (2003) An innovative performance measurement method for supply chain management. Supply Chain Management an International Journal 8(3): 209-223
11. Chang C.-W. (2010) Collaborative decision making algorithm for selection of optimal wire saw in photovoltaic wafer manufacture. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 18: 285-299
12. Cheng C. H. (1999) Evaluating weapon systems using ranking fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 107: 25-35
13. Chen S. J., Huang E. (2007) A systematic approach for supply chain improvement using design structure matrix. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 18: 285-299
14. Chen S. J., Hwang C. L. (1992) Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. Springer, Berlin
15. Chen M. F., Tzeng G. H. (2004) Combining grey relation and TOPSIS concepts for selecting an expatriate host country. Mathematical and Computer Modeling 40: 1473-1490
16. Chryssolouris G., Makris S., Xanthakis V., Mourtzis D. (2004) Towards the internet based supply chain management for the ship repair industry. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 17(1): 45-57
17. Deng J. (1989) Grey information space. The Journal of Grey System 1(1): 103-117
18. Dubois D., Prade H. (1980) Fuzzy sets and systems. Academic Press, New York
19. Forrester J. W. (1961) Industrial dynamics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
20. Garcia-Cascales, M. S., & Lamata M. T. (2009). Multi-criteria analysis for a maintenance management problem in an engine factory: Rational choice. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 1-10.
21. Gintic Institute of Manufacturing Technology: (2000) SCOR version 3.1 details metrics calculation. Gintic Scm Center, USA
22. Gintic Institute of Manufacturing Technology: (2002) Measuring supply chain performance using a SCOR-based approach. Gintic Scm Center, USA
23. Gunasekaran A., Patel C., McGaughey R. E. (2004) A framework for supply chain performance measurement. International Journal of Production Economics 87: 333-347
24. Harrington H. J. (1991) Improving business processes. TQM Magazine 3(1): 499-507
25. Huang S. H., Sheoran S. K., Wang G. (2004) A review and analysis of supply chain operations reference (SCOR) model. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 9(1): 23- 24
26. Hwang C., Yoon K. (1981) Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and application. Springer, New York
27. Kaplan R. S., Norton D. P. (2001) Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management: Part I. Horizons 15(1): 87-104
28. Kaplan R. S., Norton P. D. (1992) The balanced scorecard measures that drives performance. Harvard Business Review 70(1): 71- 79
29. Makris S., Xanthakis V., Mourtzis D., Chryssolouris G. (2008) On the information modeling for the electronic operation of supply chains: A maritime case study. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 24: 140-149
30. Makris S., Zoupas P., Chryssolouris G. (2011) Supply chain control logic for enabling adaptability under uncertainty. International Journal of Production Research 49(1): 121-137
31. Malina, M., & Selto, F. (2004). Causality in performance measurement models. Naval Postgraduate School working paper. Naval Postgraduate School, USA.
32. Maskell B. H. (1991) Performance measurement for world class manufacturing. Productivity Press, USA
33. Mentzer J. T. (2000) Supply chain management. (1st ed.). Sage, USA
34. Mikhailov L. (2004) A fuzzy approach to deriving priorities from interval pairwise comparison judgements. European Journal of Operational Research 159: 687-704
35. Min H., Zhou G. (2002) Supply chain modeling: Past, present and future. Computers & Industrial Engineering Journal 43: 231-249
36. Parkan C., Wu M. L. (1997) On the equivalence of operational performance measurement and multiple attribute decision making. International Journal of Production Research 35(11): 2963-2988
37. Rangone A. (1996) An analytical hierarchy process framework for comparing the overall performance of manufacturing departments. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 16(8): 104-119
38. Saaty T. L. (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 15(3): 234-281
39. Saaty T. L. (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. Mc-Graw Hill, New York
40. Saaty T. L. (1990) An exposition of the AHP in reply to the paper remarks on the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 22: 3-13
41. Santos S. P., Belton V., Howick S. (2002) Adding value to performance measurement by using system dynamics and multicriteria analysis. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 22(11): 1246-1272
42. Schniederjans M. J., Garvin T. (1997) Using the analytic hierarchy process and multi-objective programming for the selection of cost drivers in activity-based costing. European Journal of Operational Research 100(1): 72-80
43. Schoeneborn, F. (2003). Linking balanced scorecard to system dynamics. In Proceeding of 2003 international system dynamics Conference.
44. SCOR 5.0. (2000). SCOR 5.0 overview booklet, supply chain council editions. 2000 organisation avalaible on http://www.supply-chain.org/cs/root/ home.
45. Shyjith K., Ilangkumaran M., Kumanan S. (2008) Multi-criteria decision-making approach to evaluate optimum maintenance strategy in textile industry. Journal of Quality In Maintenance Engineering 14(4): 375-386
46. Stefanovic D., Stefanovic N. (2008) Methodology for modeling and analysis of supply networks. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 19(4): 485-503
47. Stewart G. (1995) Supply chain performance benchmarking study reveals keys to supply chain excellence. Logistics Information Management 8(2): 38-44
48. Suwignjo P., Bititci U. S., Carrie A. S. (2000) Quantitative models for performance measurement system. International Journal of Production Economics 63(1): 231-241
49. Tan K. H., Platts K. (2003) Linking objectives to actions: A decision support approach based on cause effect linkages. Decision Sciences 34(3): 569-593
50. Tsai H. Y., Huang B. H., Wang A. S. (2008) Combining ANP and TOPSIS concepts for evaluation and performance of property-liability insurance companies. Journal of Social Sciences 4(1): 56-61
51. Varma S., Wadhwa S., Deshmukh S. G. (2008) Evaluating petroleum supply chain performance: Application of analytical hierarchy process to balanced scorecard. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics 20(3): 343-356
52. Wang G., Huang S. H., Dismukes J. P. (2004) Product-driven supply chain selection using integrated multi-criteria decision-making methodology. International Journal of Production Economics 91: 1-15
53. Wolstenholme, E. (1998). Balanced strategies for balanced scorecards: The role of system dynamics in supporting balanced scorecard and value based management. In Proceeding of 1998 international system dynamics conference.
54. Xua Z., Chena J. (2007) An interactive method for fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making. Information Sciences 177(1): 248-263
55. Young, S. H. & Tu, C. K. (2004). Exploring some dynamically aligned principles of developing a balanced scorecard. In Proceeding of 2004 international system dynamics conference.