Evaluating model fit to determine if logarithmic transformations are necessary in allometry: A comment on the exchange between Packard (2009) and Kerkhoff and Enquist (2009)

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Volumn 317, Issue , 2013, Pages 418-421

  Ballantyne, Ford ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Allometry; Likelihood; Scaling; Transformation

Indexed keywords

ADDITIVE ERROR MODEL; ALLOMETRY; ANALYTICAL ERROR; BIOLISTIC TRANSFORMATION; LETTER; LOGARITHMIC TRANSFORMATION; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; MULTIPLICATIVE ERROR MODEL; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; BIOMETRY; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL;

EID: 84872389278     PISSN: 00225193     EISSN: 10958541     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.09.035     Document Type: Letter

References (22)

1. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 1974, 19(6):716-723.
2. Blackburn T.M., Gaston K.J. Methodological issues in macroecology. Am. Nat. 1998, 151:68-83.
3. Bolker B. Ecological Data and Models in R 2008, Princeton University Press.
4. Burnham K., Anderson D. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference. a Practical Information-Theoretic Approach 2002, Springer Verlag.
5. Casella G., Berger R.L. Statistical Inference 2002, Duxbury. second edition.
6. Charnov E.L. Life History Invariants 1993, Oxford University Press.
7. Ellison A.M., Dennis B. Paths to statistical fluency for ecologists. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2010, 8(7):362-370.
8. Finney D.L. On the distribution of a variate whose logarithm is normally distributed. J. R. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 1941, 7:155-161.
9. Kerkhoff A.J., Enquist B.J. Multiplicative by nature. why logarithmic transformation is necessary in allometry. J. Theor. Biol. 2009, 257(3):519-521.
10. Lindgren B.W. Statistical Theory 1993, Chapman and Hall. fourth edition.
11. Mangel M., Clark C. The Ecological Detective 1997, Princeton University Press.
12. Marquet P.A. Invariants, Scaling Laws, and Ecological Complexity. Science 2000, 289:1487-1488.
13. Munoz-Garcia A., Williams J.B. Basal metabolic rate in carnivores is associated with diet after controlling for phylogeny. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 2005, 78:1039-1056.
14. Packard G.C. On the use of logarithmic transformations in allometric analyses. J. Theor. Biol. 2009, 257:515-518.
15. Packard G.C. Rotational distortion in conventional allometric analyses. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A - Mol. Integrative Physiol. 2011, 159:392-400.
16. Packard G.C. Unanticipated consequences of logarithmic transformation in bivariate allometry. J. Comp. Physiol. B - Biochem. Syst. Environ. Physiol. 2011, 181:841-849.
17. Packard G.C., Birchard G.F. Traditional allometric analysis fails to provide a valid predictive model for mammalian metabolic rates. J. Exp. Zool. 2008, 211:3581-3587.
18. Packard G.C., Boardman T.J. Model selection and logarithmic transformation in allometric analysis. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 2008, 81:496-507.
19. Packard G.C., Birchard G.F., Boardman T.J. Fitting statistical models in bivariate allometry. Biol. Rev. 2011, 86:549-563.
20. Smith R.J. Logarithmic transformation bias is alometry. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 1993, 90:215-228.
21. Sprugel, D.G., 1983. Correcting for bias in log-transformed allometric equations. Ecology 64, 209-210.
22. Xiao X., White E.P., Hooten M.B., Durham S.L. On the use of log-transformation vs. nonlinear regression for analyzing biological power laws. Ecology 2011, 92(10):1887-1894.