Multiplicative by nature: Why logarithmic transformation is necessary in allometry

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Volumn 257, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 519-521

  Kerkhoff, Andrew J ^a   Enquist, Brian J ^b  

^a KENYON COLLEGE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLOMETRY; ARITHMETIC; BASAL METABOLIC RATE; CARNIVORA; ELEPHANT; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GEOMETRY; LETTER; LOGARITHMIC TRANSFORMATION; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NONHUMAN; PACKARD MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHREW; STATISTICAL MODEL;

EID: 61449174710     PISSN: 00225193     EISSN: 10958541     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.12.026     Document Type: Letter

References (17)

1. Burton R.F. A new look at the scaling of size in mammalian eyes. J. Zool. 269 (2006) 225-232
2. Calder W.A. Size, Function, and Life History (1984), Harvard University Press, Cambridge
3. Dahaene S., Izard V., Spelke E., and Pica P. Log or linear? Distinct intuitions of the number scale in Western and Amazonian Indigene cultures. Science 320 (2008) 1217-1220
4. Fechner, G.T., 1860. Elemente Der Psychophysik (Zweite Unveränderte Auflage), Erster Theil. Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel.
5. Flynn J.J., Finarelli J.A., Zehr S., Hsu J., and Nedbal M.A. Molecular phylogeny of the Carnivora (Mammalia): assessing the impact of increased sampling on resolving enigmatic relationships. Syst. Biol. 54 (2005) 317-337
6. Galton F. The geometric mean in vital and social statistics. Proc. R. Soc. London 29 (1879) 365-367
7. Gingerich P.D. Arithmetic or geometric normality of biological variation: an empirical test of theory. J. Theor. Biol. 204 (2000) 201-221
8. Graham J.H., Shumuzu K., Emlen J.E., Freeman D.C., and Merkel J. Growth models and the expected distribution of fluctuating asymmetry. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 80 (2003) 57-65
9. Huxley J.S. Problems of Relative Growth (1932), Dial Press, New York
10. Muñoz-Garcia A., and Williams J.B. Basal metabolic rate in carnivores is associated with diet after controlling for phylogeny. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 78 (2005) 1039-1056
11. Niklas K.J. Plant Allometry: The Scaling of Form and Process (1994), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
12. Packard G.C., and Boardman T.J. Model selection and logarithmic transformation in allometric analysis. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 81 (2008) 496-507
13. Packard G.C., and Birchard G.F. Traditional allometric analysis fails to provide a valid predictive model of mammalian metabolic rates. J. Exp. Biol. 211 (2008) 3581-3587
14. Packard, G.C., 2008. On the use of logarithmic transformations in allometric analyses. J. Theor. Biol., in press, doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.10.016.
15. Peters R.H. The Ecological Implications of Body Size (1983), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
16. Smith R.J. Logarithmic transformation bias in allometry. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 90 (1993) 215-228
17. Zar J.H. Calculation and miscalculation of the allometric equation as a model in biological data. BioScience 18 (1968) 1118-1120