Workshop on laboratory protocol standards for the molecular methods database

New Biotechnology

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 109-113

  Klingström, Tomas ^a   Soldatova, Larissa ^b   Stevens, Robert ^c   Roos, T Erik ^d   Swertz, Morris A ^d   Müller, Kristian M ^e   Kalaš, MatúŠ ^f,g   Lambrix, Patrick ^h   Taussig, Michael J ⁱ   Litton, Jan Eric ^j   Landegren, Ulf ^k   Bongcam Rudloff, Erik ^a,k  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^b ABERYSTWYTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^e UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

^f Uni Computing   (Norway)

^g UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^h LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

ⁱ Babraham Bioscience Technologies Ltd   (United Kingdom)

^j KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^k SCIENCE FOR LIFE LABORATORY   (Sweden)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AT-SPEED; BIG DATUM; BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH; BIOMEDICAL ONTOLOGIES; HIGH DEMAND; HIGH-THROUGHPUT TECHNOLOGIES; LABORATORY PROTOCOLS; LIFE-SCIENCES; LONG-TERM GOALS; MOLECULAR METHODS; NON-COHERENT; SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE;

RESEARCH;

DATABASE SYSTEMS;

COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONFERENCE PAPER; DATA BASE; HUMAN; LABORATORY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MOLECULAR METHOD DATABASE; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; STANDARD; WORKFLOW; WORKSHOP;

CONGRESSES AS TOPIC; DATABASES AS TOPIC; INTERNET; LABORATORIES; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY;

EID: 84872388003     PISSN: 18716784     EISSN: 18764347     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2012.05.019     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Soldatova L.N., et al. An ontology for a robot scientist. Bioinformatics 2006, 22:e464-e471.
2. King R.D., et al. Functional genomic hypothesis generation and experimentation by a robot scientist. Nature 2004, 427:247-252.
3. Soldatova L.N., et al. The EXACT description of biomedical protocols. Bioinformatics 2008, 24:i295-i303.
4. Malone J., et al., Software Ontology Project. http://softwareontology.wordpress.com/.
5. OBI Ontology: The Ontology for Biomedical Investigations. http://obi-ontology.org/page/Main_Page.
6. Lambrix P., et al. RepOSE: an environment for repairing missing ontological structure. The Semantic Web 2009, Vol. 5926:365-366. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
7. Pettifer S., et al. The EMBRACE web service collection. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38:W683-W688.
8. EDAM Ontology. http://edamontology.org/.
9. Bhagat J., et al. BioCatalogue: a universal catalog of web services for the life sciences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38:W689-W694.
10. Taylor C.F., et al. Promoting coherent minimum reporting guidelines for biological and biomedical investigations: the MIBBI project. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008, 26:889-896.
11. Swertz M.A., et al. The MOLGENIS toolkit: rapid prototyping of biosoftware at the push of a button. BMC Bioinform. 2010, 11:S12.
12. Adamusiak T., et al. Universal syntax solutions for the integration, search, and exchange of phenotype and genotype information. Human Mutat. 2012, 33(5):867-873. 10.1002/humu.22070.
13. Adamusiak T., et al. OntoCAT-simple ontology search and integration in Java, R and REST/JavaScript. BMC Bioinform. 2011, 12:218.
14. Van Den Akker P.C., et al. The international dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa patient registry: an online database of dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa patients and their COL7A1 mutations. Hum. Mutat. 2011, 32:1100-1107.
15. Swertz M.A., Jansen R.C. Beyond standardization: dynamic software infrastructures for systems biology. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2007, 8:235-243.