Speech without rights: The status of public space on the internet

Communication Review

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 1-23

  Stein, Laura ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84872382756     PISSN: 10714421     EISSN: 15477487     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10714420801888385     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Allen, D. S., 2005. Democracy, Inc.: The Press and Law in the Corporate Rationalization of the Public Sphere, Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
2. Aurigi, A., and Graham, S., 1998. “ The “crisis” in the urban public realm ”. In Cyberspace Divide: Equality, Agency and Policy in the Information Society, Edited by: Loader, B. D., 57–80. New York: Routledge.
3. Barber, B. R., 1984. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age, Berkeley: University of California Press.
4. Barron, J. A., 1981. Public Rights and the Private Press, Toronto: Butterworth.
5. Benkler, Y., 2000. Net regulation: Taking stock and looking forward. University of Colorado Law Review, 71: 1203–1261.
6. Benkler, Y., 2006. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
7. Buchanan, G. S., 1991. The case of the vanishing public forum. University of Illinois Law Review, 1991: 949–981.
8. Cohen, J., 1993. Freedom of expression. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 22: 207–263.
9. Cooper, M., 2000. Open access to the broadband Internet: Technical and economic discrimination in closed proprietary networks. University of Colorado Law Review, 71: 1011–1069.
10. Day, D. S., 1992. The end of public forum doctrine. Iowa Law Review, 78: 143–203.
11. Dewey, J., 1954. The Public and Its Problems, Athens: Ohio University Press. (original work published 1927)
12. Dillman, J., 1999. Arkansas educational television commission v. forbes—journalistic editorial discretion or unconstitutional prior restraint?. University of Toledo Law Review, 30: 331–357.
13. Downing, J., 1989. Computers for political change: PeaceNet and public data access. Journal of Communication, 39: 154–162.
14. Dyson, E., Gilder, G., Keyworth, G., and Toffler, A., 1999. “ Cyberspace and the American dream: A Magna Carta for the knowledge age ”. In Communications Policy and the Public Interest, Edited by: Aufderheide, P., 240–256. New York: Guilford Press.
15. Emerson, T., 1970. The System of Freedom of Expression, New York: Random House.
16. Fraser, N., 1999. “ Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy ”. In Habermas and the Public Sphere, Edited by: Calhoun, C., 109–142. Cambridge: MIT Press.
17. Gey, S. G., 1998. Reopening the public forum—from sidewalks to cyberspace. Ohio State Law Journal, 58: 1535–1634.
18. Habermas, J., 1991. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry Into a Category of Bourgeois Society, Cambridge: MIT Press. (original work published 1962)
19. Habermas, J., 1998. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, Cambridge: MIT Press.
20. Harne, C., 2004. Filtering software in public libraries: Traditional collection decision or congressionally induced first amendment violation?. Mercer Law Review, 55: 1029–1042.
21. Kalven, H., Jr. 1965. The concept of the public forum: Cox v. Louisiana. Supreme Court Review,: 1–32.
22. Kline, M. T., 1999. Public libraries: Mainstream Loudoun v. Board of Trustees of the Loudoun County Library. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 14: 347–370.
23. Lessig, L., 2001. The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World, New York: Random House.
24. Miltner, K. A., 2005. Discriminatory filtering: CIPA's effect on our nation's youth and why the Supreme Court erred in upholding the constitutionality of the Children's Internet Protection Act. Federal Communication Law Journal, 57: 555–578.
25. Mosco, V., 1996. The Political Economy of Communication: Rethinking and Renewal, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Nunziato, D. C., 2005. The death of the public forum in cyberspace. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 20: 1115–1171.
27. Post, R. C., 1987. Between governance and management: The history and theory of the public forum. UCLA Law Review, 34: 1713–1835.
28. Post, R. C., 1996. Subsidized speech. Yale Law Journal, 106: 151–195.
29. Rojas, A., September 11 2006. “ No stopping the student presses: A new law bans the censorship of public university and college newspapers in California ”. In Sacramento Bee September 11, A1
30. Schauer, F., 1982. Free Speech: A Philosophical Enquiry, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Schesser, S. D., 2006. A new domain for public speech: Opening public spaces online. California Law Review, 94: 1791–1825.
32. Shiffrin, S. H., and Choper, J. H., 1996. The First Amendment: Cases, Comments, Questions, 2nd, St. Paul, MI: West.
33. Stein, L., 2000. Can the first amendment protect public space on U.S. media systems?. Communication Law and Policy, 5: 349–383.
34. Stein, L., 2006. Speech Rights in America:The First Amendment, Democracy and the Media, Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
35. Twohey, M., 2005. Despite court ruling, UWM won't censor students, dean says. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, August 19: B1
36. Wilson, E., 2007. Bill would free student press. The Seattle Times, January 21: B1
37. Wu, F., 2004. United States v. American Library Association: The Children's Internet Protection Act, library filtering, and institutional roles. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 19: 555–583.