The design and use of performance information in Indonesian local governments under diverging stakeholder pressures

Public Administration and Development

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 15-28

  Mimba, Ni Putu S H ^a   Van Helden, G Jan ^b   Tillema, Sandra ^b  

^a UDAYANA UNIVERSITY   (Indonesia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Indonesian local governments; Less developed countries; Performance measurement; Public sector

Indexed keywords

CORRUPTION; DECENTRALIZATION; DEVELOPING WORLD; LOCAL GOVERNMENT; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PUBLIC SECTOR; STAKEHOLDER;

INDONESIA;

EID: 84872371779     PISSN: 02712075     EISSN: 1099162X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pad.1612     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. ADB. 1997. Governance Bank Policies, Operations Manual. Asian Development Bank, section 54: Manila.
2. Agere S. 2000. Promoting Good Governance: Principles, Practices and Perspectives. Commonwealth Secretariat Management and Training Service Division: London.
3. Andrews M, Shah A. 2003. Assessing local government performance in developing countries. In Handbook on Public Sector Performance Reviews 2: Measuring Government Performance in the Delivery of Public Services, Shah A (Ed.) World Bank: Washington DC; 3.1-3.26.
4. Batley R. 2004. The politics of service delivery reform. Development and Change 35: 31-56.
5. Boyne GA. 2002. Concepts and indicators of local authority performance: an evaluation of the statutory frameworks in England and Wales. Public Money & Management. 22: 17-24.
6. Brignall S, Modell S. 2000. An institutional perspective on performance measurement and management in the 'new public sector'. Management Accounting Research 11: 281-306.
7. Broadbent J, Guthrie J. 2008. Public sector to public services: 20years of "contextual" accounting research. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal. 21: 129-169.
8. Dean PN. 1988. Government financial management systems in developing countries, In Government Accounting and Auditing: International Comparisons, Chan J, Jones R (Eds). Routledge: London; 149-174.
9. DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW. 1983. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48: 147-160.
10. Graves A, Hess T, Matthews R. 2002. Using models as tools in education and training, In Crop-soil Simulation Models Applications in Developing Countries Matthews R, Stephens W (Eds.) CABI: Wallingford: 151-182.
11. Groot T. 1999. Budgetary reforms in the non-profit sector: a comparative analysis of experiences in health care and higher education in the Netherlands. Financial Accountability & Management. 15: 353-376.
12. Helden GJ van. 2005. Researching public sector transformation: the role of management accounting. Financial Accountability & Management. 21: 99-133.
13. Hopper T, Tsamenyi M, Uddin S, Wickramasinghe D. 2003. The state they're in. Financial Management. CIMA: 14-19.
14. Hopper T, Tsamenyi M, Uddin S, Wickramasinghe D. 2009. Management accounting in less developed countries: what is known and needs knowing. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability. 22: 469-514.
15. IMF. 2002. The role of capacity building in poverty reduction. An IMF Issues Brief, retrieved from http://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/ib/2002/031402.htm
16. Indonesian Government. 2003. LAKIP Guidance, LAN Nomor 239/IX/6/Y/2003. The Indonesian Government: Jakarta.
17. Leeuw FL, van Gils G, Kreft C. 1998. Anti-corruption Initiatives in Uganda and Tanzania: A Mid-term Evaluation. World Bank Institute Evaluation Studies: Washington.
18. Manning N. 2001. The legacy of New Public Management in developing countries. International Review of Administrative Sciences 67: 297-312.
19. Mimba NPSH, Helden GJ van, Tillema S. 2007. Public sector performance measurement in developing countries: a literature review and research agenda. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change 3: 192-208.
20. Modell S. 2009. Institutional research on performance measurement and management in the public sector accounting literature: a review and assessment. Financial Accountability & Management. 25: 277-303.
21. Olowe-Okere E, Tomkins C. 1998. Understanding the evolution of government financial control systems. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal. 11: 309-331.
22. Rijckeghem C van, Weder B. 1997. Corruption and rate of temptation: do low wages in the civil service cause corruption? IMF Working Paper 97/73, International Monetary Fund: Washington, DC.
23. Sanderson I. 2001. Performance management, evaluation and learning in 'modern' local government. Public Administration. 79: 297-313.
24. Smoke P. 2001. A review of current concepts and practice, democracy, governance and human right. Programme Paper no. 2. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
25. Splettstoesser D. 1998. Electronic decision-making for developing countries. Group Decision and Negotiation 7: 417-433.
26. Tillema S, Mimba NPSH, Helden GJ van. 2010. The changing role of public sector performance measurement in less developed countries. Public Administration and Development 3: 203-214.
27. UNDP (United Nations Development Program). 1997. Governance and sustainable human development. A UNDP Policy Document.
28. Wickramasinghe D, Hopper T. 2005. A cultural political economy of management controls: a case study of a textile mill in a traditional Sinhalese village. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 16: 473-503.
29. World Bank. 2004. World Development Report 2003. Oxford University Press: New York.