Performance of a new fluorescence camera for detection of occlusal caries in vitro

Lasers in Medical Science

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 101-109

  Jablonski Momeni, Anahita ^a   Liebegall, Fabian ^a   Stoll, Richard ^b   Heinzel Gutenbrunner, Monika ^a   Pieper, Klaus ^a  

^a PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

^b JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Fluorescence camera; ICDAS II; Occlusal caries; Reproducibility; Sensitivity; Specificity

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CAMERA; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; FLUORESCENCE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IN VITRO STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MOLAR TOOTH; PREMOLAR TOOTH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VALIDITY;

AREA UNDER CURVE; DENTAL CARIES; FLUORESCENCE; HUMANS; PHOTOGRAPHY, DENTAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 84872354721     PISSN: 02688921     EISSN: 1435604X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10103-012-1080-9     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Pitts N (2004) "ICDAS" - an international system for caries detection and assessment being developed to facilitate caries epidemiology, research and appropriate clinical management. Community Dent Health 21:193-198
2. Jablonski-Momeni A, Stachniss V, Ricketts DNJ, Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M, Pieper K (2008) Reproducibility and accuracy of the ICDAS-II for detection of occlusal caries in vitro. Caries Res 42:79-87
3. International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) Coordinating Committee. Criteria Manual. 2009. (http://www.icdas.org). Accessed 10 Dec 2011
4. Hibst R, Paulus R, Lussi A (2001) Detection of occlusal caries by laser fluorescence: basic and clinical investigations. Med Laser Appl 16:205-213
5. Rodrigues JA, Hug I, Neuhaus KW, Lussi A (2011) Light-emitting diode and laser fluorescence-based devices in detecting occlusal caries. J Biomed Opt 16:107003
6. Pretty IA (2006) Caries detection and diagnosis: novel technologies. J Dent 34:727-739
7. Thoms M (2006) Detection of intraoral lesions using a fluorescence camera. Proc SPIE Lasers Dent XII 6137:1-7
8. Rodrigues JA, Hug I, Diniz MB, Lussi A (2008) Performance of fluorescence methods, radiographic examination and ICDAS II on occlusal surfaces in vitro. Caries Res 42:297-304
9. De Benedetto MS, Morais CC, Novaes TF, de Almeida RJ, Braga MM, Mendes FM (2010) Comparing the reliability of a new fluorescence camera with conventional laser fluorescence devices in detecting caries lesions in occlusal and smooth surfaces of primary teeth. Lasers Med Sci 26:157-162
10. Jablonski-Momeni A, Schipper HM, Rosen SM, Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M, Roggendorf MJ, Stoll R, Stachniss V, Pieper K (2011) Performance of a fluorescence camera for detection of occlusal caries in vitro. Odontology 99:55-61
11. Jablonski-Momeni A, Rosen SM, Schipper HM, Stoll R, Roggendorf MJ, Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M, Stachniss V, Pieper K (2012) Impact of measuring multiple or single occlusal lesions on estimates of diagnostic accuracy using fluorescence methods. Lasers Med Sci 27:343-352
12. Jablonski-Momeni A, Ricketts DNJ, Weber K, Ziomek O, Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M, Schipper HM, Stoll R, Pieper K (2010) Effect of different time intervals between examinations on the reproducibility of ICDAS-II for occlusal caries. Caries Res 44:267-271
13. Jablonski-Momeni A, Ricketts DN, Stachniss V, Maschka R, Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M, Pieper K (2009) Occlusal caries: evaluation of direct microscopy versus digital imaging used for two histological classification systems. J Dent 37:204-211
14. Downer MC (1975) Concurrent validity of an epidemiological diagnostic system for caries with the histological appearance of extracted teeth as validating criterion. Caries Res 9:231-246
15. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 327:307-310
16. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc Inc., Hillsdale
17. Tape TG. Interpreting Diagnostic Tests. University of Nebraska Medical Center. http://gim.unmc.edu/dxtests/. Accessed 12 Feb 2012
18. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1983) A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 148:839-843
19. Aktan AM, Cebe MA, Ciftçi ME, Sirin Karaarslan E (2011) A novel LED-based device for occlusal caries detection. Lasers Med Sci. doi: 10.1007/s10103-011-1020-0
20. Pretty IA, Maupomé G (2004) A closer look at diagnosis in clinical dental practice. Part 5. Emerging technologies for caries detection and diagnosis. J Can Dent Assoc 70:540, 540a-i
21. Tranaeus S, Shi XQ, Lindgren LE, Trollsås K, Angmar-Månsson B (2002) In vivo repeatability and reproducibility of the quantitative light-induced fluorescence method. Caries Res 36:3-9
22. Pretty IA, Hall AF, Smith PW, Edgar WM, Higham SM (2002) The intra- and inter-examiner reliability of quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) analyses. Br Dent J 193:105-109
23. Bland JM, Altman DG (1999) Measuring agreement in method comparison Studies. Stat Methods Med Res 8:135-160
24. Jablonski-Momeni A, Ricketts DNJ, Rolfsen S, Stoll R, Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M, Stachniss V, Pieper K (2011) Performance of laser fluorescence at tooth surface and histological section. Lasers Med Sci 26:171-178
25. Francescut P, Zimmerli B, Lussi A (2006) Influence of different storage methods on laser fluorescence values: a two-year study. Caries Res 40:181-185