Ecosystem services and landscape management: Three challenges and one plea

International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services and Management

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 305-312

  Setten, Gunhild ^a   Stenseke, Marie ^b   Moen, Jon ^c  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^c UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Ecosystem services; Landscape dynamics; Landscape management; Nature culture relations; Social and cultural services

Indexed keywords

CULTURAL TRADITION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; LANDSCAPE CHANGE; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; NATURE-SOCIETY RELATIONS; VALUATION;

EID: 84872340350     PISSN: 21513732     EISSN: 21513740     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/21513732.2012.722127     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Bennett EM, Peterson GD, Gordon JL. 2009. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol Lett. 12(1):1-11.
2. Chan KMA, Pringle RM, Ranganathan J, Boggs CL, Chan Y, Ehrlich PR, Haff PK, Heller NE, Al-Khafaji K, Macmynowski DP. 2007. When agendas collide: human welfare and biological conservation. Conserv Biol. 21(1):59-68.
3. Chan KMA, Satterfield T, Goldstein J. 2012. Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecol Econ. 74:8-18.
4. Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Naeem S, Limburg K, Paruelo J, O'Neill RV, et al. 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature. 387(6630):253-260.
5. Council of Europe. 2000. European Landscape Convention CETS No. 176, Explanatory Report [Internet]. 2000. [cited 2012 Jan 4]. Available from: http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/EN/Reports/Html/176.htm
6. Daw T, Brown K, Rosendo S, Pomeroy R. 2011. Applying the ecosystem services concept to poverty alleviation: the need to disaggregate human well-being. Environ Conserv. 38(4):370-379.
7. de Bello F, Lavorel S, Diaz S, Harrington R, Cornelissen JHC, Bardgett RD, Berg MP, Cipriotti P, Feld CK, Hering D, et al. 2010. Towards an assessment of multiple ecosystem processes and services via functional traits. Biodivers Conserv. 19(10):2873-2893.
8. de Groot RS, Alkemade R, Braat L, Hein L, Willemen L. 2010. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol Complex. 7(3):260-272. doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006
9. Dempsey J, Robertson MM. in press. Ecosystem services: tensions, impurities, and points of engagement with neoliberalism [Internet]. Prog Hum Geogr [cited 2012 Sept 5]. http://phg.sagepub.com/content/early/2012/03/13/ 0309132512437076.full.pdf+html.
10. Diaz S, Quetier F, Caceres DM, Trainor SF, Perez-Harguindeguy N, Bert-Harte MS, Finegan B, Pena-Claros M, Poorter L. 2011. Linking functional diversity and social actor strategies in a framework for interdisciplinary analysis of nature's benefits to society. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 108(3):895-902.
11. Dick JMCP, Smith RI, Scott EM. 2011. Ecosystem services and associated concepts. Environmetrics. 22(5):598-607. doi:10.1002/env.1085
12. [TEEB] The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity. 2010a. In: Kumar P, editor. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: ecological and economic foundations. London (UK): Earthscan.
13. [TEEB] The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity. 2010b. Mainstreaming the economics of nature. A synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB. Malta: Progress Press.
14. Ehrlich PR, Ehrlich AH. 1981. Extinction: the causes and consequences of the disappearances of species. New York (NY): Random House.
15. Ehrlich PR, Mooney HA. 1983. Extinction, substitution, and ecosystem services. BioScience. 33(4):248-254.
16. European Science Foundation. 2010. Landscape in a changing world. Bridging divides, integrating disciplines, serving society. Strasbourg (France): ESF. Science Policy Briefing 41.
17. Fish RD. 2011. Environmental decision making and an ecosystems approach: some challenges from the perspective of social science. Prog Phys Geog. 35(5):671-680.
18. Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK, et al. 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science. 309(5734):570-574.
19. Folke C, Carpenter S, Walker B, Scheffer M, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, Holling CS. 2004. Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 35:557-581.
20. Gómez-Baggethun E, de Groot R, Lomas PL, Montes C. 2009. The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: from early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecol Econ. 69(6):1209-1218.
21. Hägerstrand T. 1982. Diorama, path and project. Tijdschr Econ Soc Geogr. 73(6):323-339.
22. Hägerstrand T. 2001. A look at the political geography of environmental management. In: Buttimer A, editor. Sustainable landscapes and lifeways: scale and appropriateness. Cork (Ireland): Cork University Press. p. 35-58.
23. Hanley N, Spash C, Walker L. 1995. Problems in valuing the benefits of biodiversity protection. Environ Resour Econ. 5(3):249-272.
24. Head L. 2007. Cultural ecology: the problematic human and the terms of engagement. Prog Hum Geogr. 31(6):837-846.
25. Head L. Forthcoming 2012. (Re)conceptualizing the human in cultural landscapes and social-ecological systems. In: Plieninger T, Bieling C, editors. Resilience and the cultural landscape: understanding and managing change in human shaped environments. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. p. 65-79.
26. Head L, Trigger D,Mulcock J. 2005. Culture as concept and influence in environmental management research. Conserv Soc. 3(2):251-264.
27. Ingold T. 2000. The perception of the environment: essays in livelihood, dwelling and skill. London (UK): Routledge.
28. Jerneck A, Olsson L, Ness B, Anderberg S, Baier M, Clark E, Hickler T, Hornborg A, Kronsell A, Lövbrand E, et al. 2011. Structuring sustainability science. Sustain Sci. 6(1):69-82.
29. Kareiva P,Watts S, McDonald R, Boucher T. 2007. Domesticated nature: shaping landscapes and ecosystems for human welfare. Science. 316(5833):1866-1869.
30. Kenward RE, Whittingham MJ, Arampatzis S, Manos BD, Hahn T, Terry A, Simoncini R, Alcorn J, Bastian O, Donlan M, et al. 2011. Identifying governance strategies that effectively support ecosystem services, resource sustainability, and biodiversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 108(13): 5308-5312.
31. Kosoy N, Corbera E. 2010. Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism. Ecol Econ. 69(6):1228-1236.
32. Kumar M, Kumar P. 2008. Valuation of the ecosystem services: a psycho-cultural perspective. Ecol Econ. 64(4):808-819.
33. Lavorel S, Grigulis K, Lamarque P, Colace MP, Garden D, Girel J, Pellet G, Douzet R. 2011. Using plant functional traits to understand the landscape distribution of multiple ecosystem services. J Ecol. 99(1):135-147.
34. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends. Vol. 1, Findings of the condition and trends working group of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Washington (DC): Island Press.
35. Myers N. 1984. The primary source: tropical forests and our future. New York (NY): Norton.
36. Norgaard R. 2010. Ecosystem services: from eyeopening metaphor to complexity blinder. Ecol Econ. 69(6):1219-1227. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11. 009
37. Nunes PALD, van den Bergh JCJM. 2001. Economic valuation of biodiversity: sense or nonsense? Ecol Econ. 39(2):203-222.
38. Pagiola S, von Ritter K, Bishop JT. 2004. Assessing the economic value of ecosystem conservation. Washington (DC): TNC-IUCN-WB.
39. Peterson MJ, Hall DM, Feldpausch-Parker AM, Peterson TR. 2009. Obscuring ecosystem function with application of the ecosystem services concept. Conserv Biol. 24(1):113-119.
40. Potschin MB, Haines-Young RH. 2011. Ecosystem services: exploring a geographical perspective. Prog Phys Geog. 35(5):575-594.
41. Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson GD, Bennett EM. 2010. Ecosystem service bundles for analysing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 107(11):5242-5247.
42. Redford KH, Adams WM. 2009. Payment for ecosystem services and the challenge of saving nature. Conserv Biol. 23(4):785-787.
43. Robertson MM. 2012. Measurement and alienation: making a world of ecosystem services. Trans InstBrit Geograph NS. 37(3):386-401.
44. Rodríguez JP, Beard Jr TD, Bennett EM, Cumming GS, Cork S, Agard J, Dobson AP, Peterson GD. 2006. Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecol Soc. 11(1):28.
45. Salles JM. 2011. Valuing biodiversity and ecosystem services: why put economic values on nature? C R Biol. 334 (5-6):469-482.
46. Satake A, Rudel TK, Onuma A. 2008. Scale mismatches and their ecological and economic effects on landscapes: a spatially explicit model. Glob Environ Change. 18(4): 768-775.
47. Schaich H, Bieling C, Plieninger T. 2010. Linking ecosystem services with cultural landscape research. GAIA. 19(4):269-277.
48. Setten G. 2004. The habitus, the rule and the moral landscape. Cult Geogr. 11(4):389-415.
49. Sharman M. 2010. Ecosystem services: paradigm, prism, pablum or placebo? Unpublished manuscript, Brussels.
50. Stenseke M, Lindborg R, Dahlberg A, Slätmo E. Forthcoming 2012. System or arena? Conceptual concerns around the analysis of landscape dynamics. In: Plieninger T, Bieling C, editors. Resilience and the cultural landscape: understanding and managing change in human shaped environments. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. p. 80-94.
51. Strunz S. 2012. Is conceptual vagueness and asset? Arguments from philosophy of science applied to the concept of resilience. Ecol Econ. 76:112-118.
52. Tallis H, Kareiva P, Marvier M, Chang A. 2008. An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 105(28):9457-9464. [UK NEA] UK National Ecosystem Assessment. 2011. Technical report. Cambridge (UK): UNEP-WCMC.
53. Van Hecken G, Bastiaensen J. 2010. Payments for ecosystem services: justified or not? A political view. Environ Sci Pol. 13(8):785-792.
54. Wegner G, Pascual U. 2011. Cost-benefit analysis in the context of ecosystem services for human well-being: a multidisciplinary critique. Glob Environ Change. 21(2):492-504. Downloaded