Impact response of Kevlar composites with nanoclay enhanced epoxy matrix

Composites Part B: Engineering

Volumn 46, Issue , 2013, Pages 7-14

  Reis, P N B ^a   ZhangFerreira, J A M ^b   Zhang, Z Y ^c   Benameur, T ^d   Richardson, M O W ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BEIRA INTERIOR   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MONASTIR   (Tunisia)

^e GTG/CTA Ltd   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

A. Hybrid; A. Polymer matrix composites (PMCs); B. Impact behaviour; D. Mechanical testing

Indexed keywords

EPOXY RESINS; IMPACT RESISTANCE; IMPACT STRENGTH; LAMINATES; MECHANICAL TESTING; NANOCOMPOSITES; NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS;

A. HYBRID; IMPACT BEHAVIOUR; IMPACT PERFORMANCE; IMPACT RESPONSE; INTERFACE ADHESION; MARGINAL BENEFIT; POLYMER MATRIX COMPOSITES (PMCS); SILANE TREATMENT;

POLYMER MATRIX COMPOSITES;

EID: 84872337377     PISSN: 13598368     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.10.028     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Caprino G. Residual strength prediction of impacted CFRP laminates. J Compos Mater 1984;18:508-18.
2. Prichard JC, Hogg PJ. The role of impact damage in post-impact compression testing. Composites 1990;21:503-9.
3. Davies GAO, Hitchings D, Zhou G. Impact damage and residual strengths of woven fabric glass/polyester laminates. Compos Part A-Appl S 1996;27:1147-56.
4. de Moura MFSF, Marques AT. Prediction of low velocity impact damage in carbon-epoxy laminates. Compos Part A-Appl S 2002;33:361-8.
5. Amaro AM, de Moura MFSF, Reis PNB. Residual strength after low velocity impact in carbon-epoxy laminates. Mater Sci Forum 2006;514-516:624-8.
6. Amaro AM, Reis PNB, de Moura MFSF. Delamination effect on bending behaviour in carbon-epoxy composites. Strain 2011;47:203-8.
7. Reis PNB, Ferreira JAM, Antunes FV, Richardson MOW. Effect of interlayer delamination on mechanical behavior of carbon/epoxy laminates. J Compos Mater 2009;43:2609-21.
8. Komarneni S. Nanocomposites. J Mater Chem 1992;2:1219-30.
9. Ling G, He J. The influence of nano-Al2O3 additive on the adhesion between enamel and steel substrate. Mater Sci Eng A-Struct 2004;379:432-6.
10. Luo J-J, Daniel IM. Characterization and modeling of mechanical behaviour of polymer/clay nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 2003;63:1607-16.
11. Giannelis EP. Polymer layered silicate nanocomposites. Adv Mater 1996;8:29-35.
12. Saber-Samandari S, Khatibi AA, Basic D. An experimental study on clay/epoxy nanocomposites produced in a centrifuge. Compos Part B-Eng 2007;38: 102-7.
13. Ke Y, Long C, Qi Z. Crystallization, properties, and crystal and nanoscale morphology of PET-clay nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci 1999;71:1139-46.
14. Song M, Hourston DJ, Yao KJ, Tay JKH, Ansarifar MA. High performance nanocomposites of polyurethane elastomer and organically modified layered silicate. J Appl Polym Sci 2003;90:3239-43.
15. Liu W, Hoa SV, Pugh M. Organoclay-modified high performance epoxy nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 2005;65:307-16.
16. Liu W, Hoa SV, Pugh M. Fracture toughness and water uptake of highperformance epoxy/nanoclay nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 2005;65:2364-73.
17. Ho M-W, Lam C-K, Lau K-T, Ng DHL, Hui D. Mechanical properties of epoxybased composites using nanoclays. Compos Struct 2006;75:415-21.
18. Faruk O, Matuana LM. Nanoclay reinforced HDPE as a matrix for wood-plastic composites. Compos Sci Technol 2008;68:2073-7.
19. Ferreira JAM, Reis PNB, Costa JDM, Richardson BCH, Richardson MOW. A study of the mechanical properties on polypropylene enhanced by surface treated nanoclays. Compos Part B-Eng 2011;42:1366-72.
20. Ferreira JAM, Reis PNB, Costa JDM, Richardson MOW. A study of the mechanical behaviour on injection moulded nanoclay enhanced polypropylene composites. J Thermoplast Compos 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 0892705711428658.
21. Ferreira JAM, Reis PNB, Costa JDM, Richardson MOW. Fatigue behaviour of Kevlar composites with nanoclay-filled epoxy resin. J Compos Mater 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0021998312452024.
22. Timmerman JF, Hayes B, Seferis JC. Nanoclay reinforcement effects on the cryogenic micro cracking of carbon fiber/epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol 2002;62:1249-58.
23. Siddiqui NA, Woo RSC, Kim JK, Leung CCK, Munir A. Mode I interlaminar fracture behavior and mechanical properties of CFRPs with nanoclay-filled epoxy matrix. Compos Part A-Appl S 2007;38:449-60.
24. Hosur MV, Chowdhury F, Jeelani S. Low-velocity impact response and ultrasonic NDE of woven carbon/epoxy-nanoclay nanocomposites. J Compos Mater 2007;41:2195-212.
25. Iqbal K, Khan S-U, Munir A, Kim J-K. Impact damage resistance of CFRP with nanoclay-filled epoxy matrix. Compos Sci Technol 2009;69:1949-57.
26. Ávila AF, Soares MI, Neto AS. A study on nanostructured laminated plates behavior under low-velocity impact loadings. Int J Impact Eng 2007;34:28-41.
27. Hosur MV, Mohammed AA, Zainuddin S, Jeelani S. Impact performance of nanophased foam core sandwich composites. Mater Sci Eng A 2008;498:100-9.
28. Hosur MV, Mohammed AA, Zainuddin S, Jeelani S. Processing of nanoclay filled sandwich composites and their response to low velocity impact loading. Compos Struct 2008;82:101-16.
29. Ávila AF, Carvalho MGR, Dias EC, da Cruz DTL. Nano-structured sandwich composites response to low-velocity impact. Compos Struct 2010;92:745-51.
30. Li QM, Ma GW, Ye ZQ. An elastic-plastic model on the dynamic response of composite sandwich beams subjected to mass impact. Compos Struct 2006;72:1-9.
31. Ávila AF, Donadon LV, Duarte HV. Modal analysis of nanocomposites plates. Compos Struct 2008;8:324-30.
32. Kang TJ, Kim C. Energy-Absorption mechanisms in Kevlar multiaxial warp-knit fabric composites under impact loading. Compos Sci Technol 2000;60:773-84.
33. Marom G, Drukker E, Weinberg A, Banbaji J. Impact behaviour of carbon/Kevlar hybrid composites. Composites 1986;17:150-3.
34. Gustin J, Joneson A, Mahinfalah M, Stone J. Low velocity impact of combination Kevlar/carbon fiber sandwich composites. Compos Struct 2005;69:396-406.
35. Halvorsen A, Salehi-Khojn A, Mahinfalah M, Nakhaei-Jazar R. Temperature effects on the impact behavior of fiberglass and fiberglass/Kevlar sandwich composites. Appl Compos Mater 2006;13:369-83.
36. Salehi-Khojin A, Mahinfalaha M, Bashirzadeh R, Freeman B. Temperature effects on Kevlar/hybrid and carbon fiber composite sandwiches under impact loading. Compos Struct 2007;78:197-206.
37. Soykasap O, Colakoglu M. Ballistic performance of a Kevlar-29 woven fibre composite under varied temperatures. Mech Compos Mater 2010;46:35-42.
38. Lee YS, Wetzel ED, Wagner NJ. The ballistic impact characteristics of Kevlar woven fabrics impregnated with a colloidal shear thickening fluid. J Mater Sci 2003;38:2825-33.
39. Reis PNB, Ferreira JAM, Santos P, Richardson MOW, Santos JB. Impact response of Kevlar composites with filled epoxy matrix. Compos Struct 2012;94:3520-8.
40. Reis PNB, Ferreira JAM, Rodrigues NFS. Impact behaviour of panels for automotive applications. Strain 2011;47(Suppl. 2):79-86.
41. Aslan Z, Karakuzu R, Okutan B. The response of laminated composite plates under low-velocity impact loading. Compos Struct 2003;59:119-27.
42. Hosur MV, Adbullah M, Jeelani S. Studies on the low-velocity impact response of woven hybrid composites. Compos Struct 2005;67:253-62.
43. Schoeppner GA, Abrate S. Delamination threshold loads for low velocity impact on composite laminates. Compos Part A-Appl S 2000;31:903-15.
44. Belingardi G, Vadori R. Low velocity impact of laminate glass-fiber-epoxy matrix composite materials plates. Int J Impact Eng 2002;27:213-29.
45. Río TG, Zaera R, Barbero E, Navarro C. Damage in CFRPs due to low velocity impact at low temperature. Compos Part B-Eng 2005;36:41-50.
46. Aktas M, Atas C, Icten BM, Karakuzu R. An experimental investigation of the impact response of composite laminates. Compos Struct 2009;87:307-13.
47. Shim VPW, Tan VBC, Tay TE. Modelling deformation and damage characteristics of woven fabric under small projectile impact. Int J Impact Eng 1995;16:585-605.