Positioning injury, rhabdomyolysis, and serum creatine kinase-concentration course in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 45-51

  Mattei, Agostino ^a   Di Pierro, Giovanni Battista ^a   Rafeld, Verena ^a   Konrad, Christoph ^b   Beutler, Jonas ^b   Danuser, Hansjörg ^a  

^a Klinik fur Urologie   (Switzerland)

^b Institut fur Anasthesie Kantonsspital Luzern   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BICARBONATE; CREATINE KINASE; CREATININE; DIURETIC AGENT; LOW MOLECULAR WEIGHT HEPARIN;

ACIDOSIS; ADULT; AGED; ALKALOSIS; ARTICLE; BLOOD PH; BODY POSITION; CANCER PATIENT; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CREATINE KINASE BLOOD LEVEL; CREATININE BLOOD LEVEL; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE SEVERITY; DIURETIC THERAPY; HUMAN; HYPERVOLEMIA; INJURY SEVERITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; PARESTHESIA; PELVIS LYMPHADENECTOMY; POSITIONING INJURY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; RHABDOMYOLYSIS; ROBOT ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOTICS; SERUM; SURGICAL RISK; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; THROMBOSIS; TRENDELENBURG POSITION;

ADULT; AGED; CREATINE KINASE; HEAD-DOWN TILT; HUMANS; LYMPH NODE EXCISION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PELVIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RHABDOMYOLYSIS; ROBOTICS;

EID: 84872335875     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: 1557900X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2012.0169     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ficarra V, Cavalleri S, Novara G, et al. Evidence from robotassisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A systematic review. Eur Urol 2007;51:45-56.
2. Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W, et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-Assisted radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol 2009;55:1037-1063.
3. Di Pierro GB, Baumeister P, Stucki P, et al. A prospective trial comparing consecutive series of open retropubic and robot-Assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a centre with a limited caseload. Eur Urol 2011;59:1-6.
4. Rozet F, Harmon J, Cathelineau X, et al. Robot-Assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 2006;24:171-179.
5. Akhavan A, Gainsburg DM, Stock JA. Complications associated with patient positioning in urologic surgery. Urology 2010;76:1309-1316.
6. Reisiger KE, Landman J, Kibel A, Clayman RV. Laparoscopic renal surgery and the risk of rhabdomyolysis: Diagnosis and treatment. Urology 2005;66(suppl 5):29-35.
7. Agarwal PK, Sammon J, Bhandari A, et al. Safety profile of robot-Assisted radical prostatectomy: A standardized report of complications in 3317 patients. Eur Urol 2011;59:684-698.
8. Mattei A, Naspro R, Annino F, et al. Tension and energy-free robotic-Assisted laparoscopic radical prostatecomy with interfascial dissection of the neurovascular bundles. Eur Urol 2007;52;687-694.
9. Lappalainen H, Tiula E, Uotila L, Mänttäri M. Elimination kinetics of myoglobin and creatine kinase in rhabdomyolyis: Implications and follow-up. Crit Care Med 2002;30:2212-2215.
10. Bellomo R, Ronco C, Kellum, JA, et al. Acute renal failure definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: The Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group. Critical Care (London, England) 2004;8:R204e12.
11. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205-213.
12. Brunner E, Domhof S, Lager F. Nonparametric Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Factorial Experiments. Wiley series in Probability and Statistics. New York, NY: Wiley, 2002.
13. Novara G, Ficarra V, D'Elia C, et al. Prospective evaluation with standardised criteria for postoperative complications after robotic-Assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2010;57:363-370.
14. Murphy DG, Bjartell A, Ficarra V, et al. Downsides of robotassisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Limitations and complications. Eur Urol 2010;57:735-746.
15. Coelho RF, Palmer KJ, Rocco B, et al. Early complication rates in a single-surgeon series of 2500 robotic-Assisted radical prostatectomies: Report applying a standardized grading system. Eur Urol 2010;57:945-952.
16. Cestari A, Buffi NM, Scapaticci E, et al. Simplifying patient positioning and port placement during robotic-Assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2010;57:530-533.
17. Bosch X, Poch E, Grau JM. Rhabdomyolysis and acute kidney injury. N Engl J Med 2009;361:62-72.
18. De Meijer AR, Fikkers BG, de Keijzer MH, et al. Serum creatine kinase as predictor of clinical course in rhabdomyolysis: A 5-year intensive care survey. Intensive Care Med 2003;29:1121-1125.
19. Ward MM. Factors predictive of acute renal failure in rhabdomyolysis. Arch Intern Med 1988;148:1553-1557.
20. Better OS, Stein JH. Early management of shock and prophylaxis of acute renal failure in traumatic rhabdomyolysis. N Engl J Med 1990;322:825-829.
21. Bagley WH, Yang H, Shah KH. Rhabdomyolysis. Intern Emerg Med 2007;2:210-218.
22. Ettinger JE, de Souza CA, Santos-Filho PV, et al. Rhabdomyolysis: Diagnosis and treatment in bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 2007;17:525-532.
23. Sever MS, Vanholder R, Lameire N. Management of crushrelated injuries after disasters. N Engl J Med 2006;354: 1052-1063.
24. Kuang W, Ng CS, Matin S, et al. Rhabdomyolysis after laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Urology 2002;60:911.
25. Kozak KR, Shah S, Ishihara KK, Schulman G. Hand-Assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy-Associated rhabdomyolysis with ARF. Am J Kidney Dis 2003;41:E5.
26. Jurczok A, Zacharias M, Wagner S, et al. Prospective non-randomized evaluation of four mediators of the systemic response after extraperitoneal laparoscopic and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2007;99: 1461-1466.
27. Miyake H, Kawabata G, Gotoh A, et al. Comparison of surgical stress between laparoscopy and open surgery in the field of urology by measurement of humoral mediators. Int J Urol 2002;9:329-333.
28. Fracalanza S, Ficarra V, Cavalleri S, et al. Is robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy less invasive than retropubic radical prostatectomy? Results from a prospective, unrandomized, comparative study. BJU Int 2008;101: 1145-1149.
29. Kalmar AF, Foubert L, Hendrickx JF, et al. Influence of steep Trendelenburg position and CO(2) pneumoperitoneum on cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and respiratory homeostasis during robotic prostatectomy. Br J Anaesth 2010;104: 433-439.
30. Rabbani F, Yunis LH, Pinochet R, et al. Comprehensive standardized report of complications of retropubic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2010;57:371-386.
31. Menon M, Shrivastava A, Bhandari M, et al. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: Technical modifications in 2009. Eur Urol 2009;56:89-96.
32. Stolzenburg JU, Rabenalt R, Do M, et al. Intrafascial nervesparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2008;53:931-940.
33. Budäus L, Isbarn H, Schlomm T, et al. Current technique of open intrafascial nerve-sparing retropubic prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2009;56:317-324.