Association of three different techniques to measure blood pressure in the first trimester with the development of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 92, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 53-60

  Vollebregt, Karlijn Corien ^a   Boer, Kees ^a   Van Der Post, Joris A M ^a   Wolf, Hans ^a  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; blood pressure; continuous finger arterial pressure waveform registration; preeclampsia

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITOR; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTINUOUS FINGER ARTERIAL PRESSURE WAVEFORM REGISTRATION; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; FEMALE; FIRST TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MATERNAL HYPERTENSION; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; NETHERLANDS; NULLIPARA; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PREECLAMPSIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SPHYGMOMANOMETER; SPHYGMOMANOMETRY; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BLOOD PRESSURE DETERMINATION; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, AMBULATORY; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION, PREGNANCY-INDUCED; NETHERLANDS; PRE-ECLAMPSIA; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY TRIMESTER, FIRST; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; SPHYGMOMANOMETERS;

EID: 84872323833     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: 16000412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01510.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Easterling TR, Benedetti TJ, Schmucker BC, Millard SP,. Maternal hemodynamics in normal and preeclamptic pregnancies: a longitudinal study. Obstet Gynecol. 1990; 76: 1061-9.
2. Rang S, Wolf H, Montfrans GA, Karemaker JM,. Serial assessment of cardiovascular control shows early signs of developing pre-eclampsia. J Hypertens. 2004; 22: 369-76.
3. Moutquin JM, Rainville C, Giroux L, Raynauld P, Amyot G, Bilodeau R, et al. A prospective study of blood pressure in pregnancy: prediction of preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985; 151: 191-6.
4. Sibai BM, Ewell M, Levine RJ, Klebanoff MA, Esterlitz J, Catalano PM, et al. Risk factors associated with preeclampsia in healthy nulliparous women. The Calcium for Preeclampsia Prevention (CPEP) Study Group. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 177: 1003-10.
5. Cnossen JS, Vollebregt KC, de VN, Ter RG, Mol BW, Franx A, et al. Accuracy of mean arterial pressure and blood pressure measurements in predicting pre-eclampsia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br Med J. 2008; 336: 1117-20.
6. Poon LC, Kametas NA, Maiz N, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH,. First-trimester prediction of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. Hypertension. 2009; 53: 812-8.
7. Ayala DE, Hermida RC, Mojon A, Fernandez JR, Silva I, Ucieda R, et al. Blood pressure variability during gestation in healthy and complicated pregnancies. Hypertension. 1997; 30 (3 Pt 2): 611-8.
8. Vollebregt KC, Gisolf J, Guelen I, Boer K, van MG, Wolf H,. Limited accuracy of the hyperbaric index, ambulatory blood pressure and sphygmomanometry measurements in predicting gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. J Hypertens. 2010; 28: 127-34.
9. Brown MA, Lindheimer MD, de Swiet M, Van Assche A, Moutquin JM,. The classification and diagnosis of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: statement from the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP). Hypertens Pregnancy. 2001; 20: IX-XIV.
10. Hehenkamp WJ, Rang S, van Goudoever J, Bos WJ, Wolf H, van der Post JA,. Comparison of Portapres with standard sphygmomanometry in pregnancy. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2002; 21: 65-76.
11. Bos WJ, van GJ, van Montfrans GA, van den Meiracker AH, Wesseling KH,. Reconstruction of brachial artery pressure from noninvasive finger pressure measurements. Circulation. 1996; 94: 1870-5.
12. Guelen I, Westerhof BE, Van Der Sar GL, van Montfrans GA, Kiemeneij F, Wesseling KH, et al. Finometer, finger pressure measurements with the possibility to reconstruct brachial pressure. Blood Press Monit. 2003; 8: 27-30.
13. Shennan AH, Kissane J, de Swiet M,. Validation of the SpaceLabs 90207 ambulatory blood pressure monitor for use in pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993; 100: 904-8.
14. O'Brien E, Darling M, Higgins J,. Ambulatory blood pressure measurement in pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994; 101: 462-3.
15. Franx A, van der Post JAM, van Montfrans GA, Bruinse HW,. Comparison of an auscultatory versus an oscillometric ambulatory blood pressure monitor in normotensive, hypertensive, and preeclamptic pregnancy. Hypertens Pregnancy. 1997; 16: 187-202.
16. Hermida RC, Ayala DE,. Sampling requirements for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the diagnosis of hypertension in pregnancy. Hypertension. 2003; 42: 619-24.
17. Leeflang MM, Bossuyt PM, Irwig L,. Diagnostic test accuracy may vary with prevalence: implications for evidence-based diagnosis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009; 62: 5-12.
18. Caritis S, Sibai B, Hauth J, Lindheimer M, VanDorsten P, Klebanoff M, et al. Predictors of pre-eclampsia in women at high risk. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 179: 946-51.
19. Lowe SA, Brown MA, Dekker GA, Gatt S, McLintock CK, McMahon LP, et al. Guidelines for the management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy 2008. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009; 49: 242-6.
20. Lindheimer MD, Taler SJ, Cunningham FG,. Hypertension in pregnancy. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2008; 2: 484-94.
21. Netea RT, Smits P, Lenders JW, Thien T,. Does it matter whether blood pressure measurements are taken with subjects sitting or supine? J Hypertens. 1998; 16: 263-8.
22. Peek M, Shennan A, Halligan A, Lambert PC, Taylor DJ, de SM,. Hypertension in pregnancy: which method of blood pressure measurement is most predictive of outcome? Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 88: 1030-3.
23. Halligan AW, Shennan A, Lambert PC, Bell SC, Taylor DJ, de SM,. Automated blood pressure measurement as a predictor of proteinuric pre-eclampsia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997; 104: 559-62.
24. Penny JA, Halligan AW, Shennan AH, Lambert PC, Jones DR, de SM, et al. Automated, ambulatory, or conventional blood pressure measurement in pregnancy: which is the better predictor of severe hypertension? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 178: 521-6.
25. Bellomo G, Narducci PL, Rondoni F, Pastorelli G, Stangoni G, Angeli G, et al. Prognostic value of 24-hour blood pressure in pregnancy. J Am Med Assoc. 1999; 282: 1447-52.
26. Brown MA, Bowyer L, McHugh L, Davis GK, Mangos GJ, Jones M,. Twenty-four-hour automated blood pressure monitoring as a predictor of preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 185: 618-22.
27. Hermida RC, Ayala DE, Fernandez JR, Mojon A, Iglesias M,. Reproducibility of the tolerance-hyperbaric test for diagnosing hypertension in pregnancy. J Hypertens. 2004; 22: 565-72.
28. Steegers EA, von DP, Duvekot JJ, Pijnenborg R,. Pre-eclampsia. Lancet. 2010; 376: 631-44.
29. Ramsey M, III,. Noninvasive automatic determination of mean arterial pressure. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1979; 17: 11-8.
30. Wesseling KH, de Wit B, Settels JJ, Klawer WH,. On the indirect registration of finger blood pressure after Penaz. Funkt Biol Med. 1982; 1: 245-50.
31. Rang S, de Pablo LB, van Montfrans GA, Bouma BJ, Wesseling KH, Wolf H,. Modelflow: a new method for noninvasive assessment of cardiac output in pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 196: 235-8.
32. Walker SP, Permezel MJ, Brennecke SP, Tuttle LK, Higgins JR,. Patient satisfaction with the SpaceLabs 90207 ambulatory blood pressure monitor in pregnancy. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2004; 23: 295-301.
33. Taylor RS, Gamble G, McCowan L, North RA,. Sleep effects on ambulatory blood pressure measurements in pregnant women. Am J Hypertens. 2001; 14: 38-43.