Deliberative engagement: An inclusive methodology for exploring professionalization

HEC Forum

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 187-201

  Kirby, Jeffrey ^a   Simpson, Christy ^a  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Deliberative engagement; Legitimacy considerations; Professionalization products; Scaffolding process; Stakeholder driven

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOETHICS; CANADA; COOPERATION; DECISION MAKING; ETHICIST; HUMAN; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; STANDARD;

BIOETHICS; CANADA; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; ETHICISTS; HUMANS; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PROFESSIONAL ROLE; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84872313586     PISSN: 09562737     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10730-012-9189-6     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Abma, T. A., Molewijk, B., & Widdershoven, G. A. (2009). Good care in ongoing dialogue: Improving the quality of care through moral deliberation and responsive evaluation. Health Care Analysis, 17, 217-235.
2. Blacksher, D., Diebel, A., Forest, P.-G., Goold, S. D., & Abelson, J. (2012). What is public deliberation? Hastings Center Report, 4(2), 14-17.
3. Campbell, S. (2010). Deliberative priority setting - a CIHR KT module. Resource document. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. From http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/43533.html.
4. Cohen, J. (1989). Deliberative democracy and democratic legitimacy. In A. Hamlin & P. Petit (Eds.), The good polity. Oxford: Blackwell.
5. Daniels, N. (2008). Just health: Meeting health needs fairly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Health.
6. Daniels, N., & Sabin, J. (2002). Setting limits fairly: Can we learn to share medical resources? New York: Oxford University Press.
7. Escobar, O. (2009). The dialogic turn: Dialogue for deliberation. In Spire Journal of Law, Politics and Societies, 4(4), 42-70.
8. Frolic, A. & PHEEP. (2012). Grassroots origins, National engagement: Exploring the professionalization of practicing healthcare ethicists in Canada. HEC Forum, 24(3).
9. Guttman, A., & Thompson, D. (2004). Why deliberative democracy? Princeton: Princeton University Press.
10. Kirby, J., & Simpson, C. (2007). An innovative, inclusive process for meso-level health policy development. Healthcare Ethics Forum, 19(2), 161-176.
11. Kirby, J., Somers, E., Simpson, C., & McPhee, J. (2008). The public funding of expensive cancer therapies: Synthesizing the '3Es' - evidence, economics and ethics. Organizational Ethics: Healthcare, Business, and Policy, 4(2), 97-108.
12. MacLean, S., & Burgess, M. (2010). In the public interest: Assessing expert and stakeholder influence in public deliberation about biobanks. Public Understanding of Sciences, 19(4), 486-496.
13. Nussbaum, M. C. (2001). Upheaval of thought: The intelligence of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. O'Doherty, K., Gauvin, F.-P., Crogan, C., & Friedman, W. (2012). Implementing a public deliberative forum. Hastings Center Report, 42(2), 20-23.
15. Oquendo, A. R. (2002). Deliberative democracy in Habermas and Nino. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 22(2), 189-226.
16. Sherwin, S., & Baylis, F. (2003). The feminist health care ethics consultant as architect and advocate. Public Affairs Quarterly, 17(2), 141-158.
17. Stein, E. (2006). Without good reason: The rationality debate in philosophy and cognitive science. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
18. Tronto, J. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethics of care. New York: Routledge.
19. Verkerk, M., & Lindemann, H. (2009). Epilogue: Naturalized bioethics in practice. In H. Lindemann, M. Verkerk, & M. U. Walker (Eds.), Naturalized bioethics: Toward responsible knowing and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Walker, M. U. (1993). Keeping moral space open: New images of ethics consulting. The Hastings Center Report, 23(2), 33-40.
21. Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.