Does Imaging Modality Used for Percutaneous Renal Access Make a Difference? A Matched Case Analysis

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 24-28

  Andonian, Sero ^a   Scoffone, Cesare M ^b   Louie, Michael K ^c   Gross, Andreas J ^d   Grabe, Magnus ^e   Daels, Francisco P J ^f   Shah, Hemendra N ^g   De La Rosette, Jean J M C H ^h  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY HEALTH CENTRE   (Canada)

^b Department of Orthopaedic Surgery   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d ASKLEPIOS HOSPITAL BARMBEK   (Germany)

^e LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^f HOSPITAL ITALIANO DE BUENOS AIRES   (Argentina)

^g RG Stone Urology and Laparoscopy Hospital   (India)

^h ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; COLON PERFORATION; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPIC GUIDED PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMAN; HYDROTHORAX; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY BIOPSY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEPHROLITHIASIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY; PERFORATION; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; ULTRASOUND; ULTRASOUND GUIDED PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY;

FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMANS; KIDNEY; KIDNEY CALCULI; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHROSTOMY, PERCUTANEOUS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 84872301398     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: 1557900X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2012.0347     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Miller NL, Matlaga BR, Lingeman JE. Techniques for fluoroscopic percutaneous renal access. J Urol 2007;178:15-23.
2. FernströmI, Johansson B. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy.Anew extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1976;10:257-259.
3. Roy OP, Angle JF, Jenkins AD, et al. Cone beam CT for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Initial evaluation of a new technology. J Endourol 2012;26:814-818.
4. Basiri A, Ziaee AM, Kianian HR, et al. Ultrasonographic versus fluoroscopic access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A randomized clinical trial. J Endourol 2008;22:281-284.
5. Zegel HG, Pollack HM, Banner MC, et al. Percutaneous nephrostomy: Comparison of sonographic and fluoroscopic guidance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1981;137:925-927.
6. Basiri A, Ziaee SA, Nasseh H, et al. Totally ultrasonographyguided percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the flank position. J Endourol 2008;22:1453-1457.
7. Gupta S, Gulati M, Suri S. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrostomy in non-dilated pelvicaliceal system. J Clin Ultrasound 1998;26:177-179.
8. de la Rosette J, Assimos D, Desai M, et al. The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: Indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients. J Endourol 2011;25:11-17.
9. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205-213.
10. Tefekli A, Ali Karadag M, Tepeler K, et al. Classification of percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications using the modified clavien grading system: Looking for a standard. Eur Urol 2008;53:184-190.
11. Aga P, Bansal R. Is intravenous urogram no longer an imaging of choice for percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Indian J Urol 2010;26:303-304.
12. Kukreja R, Desai M, Patel S, et al. Factors affecting blood loss during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Prospective study. J Endourol 2004;18:715-722.
13. Karami H, Rezaei A, Mohammadhosseini M, et al. Ultrasonography-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the flank position versus fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the prone position: A comparative study. J Endourol 2010;24:1357-1361.
14. Akman T, Binbay M, Sari E, et al. Factors affecting bleeding during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Single surgeon experience. J Endourol 2011;25:327-333.
15. Yamaguchi A, Skolarikos A, Buchholz NP, et al. Operating times and bleeding complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A comparison of tract dilation methods in 5,537 patients in the clinical research office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study. J Endourol 2011;25:933-939.
16. Lopes T, Sangam K, Alken P, et al. The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: Tract dilation comparisons in 5537 patients. J Endourol 2011;25:755-762.