On Acknowledging PCK's Shortcomings

Journal of Science Teacher Education

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 1-12

  Settlage, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84872266661     PISSN: 1046560X     EISSN: 15731847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10972-012-9332-x     Document Type: Editorial

References (25)

1. Abell, S. K. (2008). Twenty years later: Does pedagogical content knowledge remain a useful idea? International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1405-1416.
2. Alonzo, A. C., Kobarg, M., & Seidel, T. (2012). Pedagogical content knowledge as reflected in teacher-student interactions: Analysis of two video cases. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 1211-1239.
3. Barnett, J. (2003). Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education. Science Education, 87, 615-618.
4. Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P., Allensworth, E., Luppescu, S., & Easton, J. Q. (2009). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Dewey, J. (1929). The quest for certainty: A study of the relation of knowledge and action. New York: Minton, Balch & Co.
6. Donovan, M., & Bransford, J. (2007). How students learn: Science in the classroom. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
7. Duschl, R. A. (1990). Restructuring science education: The Importance of theories and their development. New York: Teachers College Press.
8. Furtak, E. M. (2012). Linking a learning progression for natural selection to teachers' enactment of formative assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 1181-1210.
9. Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on student learning. New York: Routledge.
10. Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 371-406.
11. Krnel, D., Watson, R., & Glažar, S. A. (1998). Survey of research related to the development of the concept of matter. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 257-289.
12. Lemov, D. (2010). Teach like a champion: 49 techniques that put students on the path to college. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13. Loewenberg Ball, D., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 389-407.
14. McComas, W. F. (1991). Resources for teaching evolutionary biology labs: An analysis. The American Biology Teacher, 53, 205-209.
15. Meadows, L. (2009). The missing link: An inquiry approach for teaching all students about evolution. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
16. Milner, H. R. (2010). Start where you are, but don't stay there: Understanding diversity, opportunity gaps, and teaching in today's classrooms. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17. National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
18. Olitsky, S. (2007). Facilitating identity formation, group membership, and learning in science classrooms: What can be learned from out-of-field teaching in an urban school? Science Education, 91, 201-221.
19. Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211-227.
20. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4-14.
21. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.
22. West, C. (1989). The American evasion of philosophy. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
23. Whitehead, A. N. (1929). The aims of education and other essays. New York: New American Library.
24. Wilson, S. M. (2011). Effective STEM teacher preparation, induction, and professional development. In commissioned paper presented at the Workshop on Successful STEM Education in K-12 Schools. Board on Science Education, The National Academies of Science. Washington, DC Available online: http://hub. mspnet. org/index. cfm/23255.
25. Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., Braaten, M., & Stroupe, D. (2012). Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science. Science Education, 96, 878-903.