Feasibility study of analgesia via epidural versus continuous wound infusion after laparoscopic colorectal resection

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 100, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 395-402

  Boulind, C E ^a,d   Ewings, P ^b   Bulley, S H ^a   Reid, J M ^a   Jenkins, J T ^c   Blazeby, J M ^d,e   Francis, N K ^a  

^a YEOVIL DISTRICT HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b MUSGROVE PARK HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c ST MARK S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS BRISTOL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT; LOCAL ANESTHETIC AGENT;

AGED; COLON TUMOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRALESIONAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MULTICENTER STUDY; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PILOT STUDY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECTUM TUMOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; ANALGESIA, EPIDURAL; ANALGESICS; ANESTHETICS, LOCAL; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFUSIONS, INTRALESIONAL; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PILOT PROJECTS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; QUALITY OF LIFE; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84872186230     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: 13652168     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.8999     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Basse L, Jakobsen DH, Billesbolle P, Werner M, Kehlet H,. A clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection. Ann Surg 2000; 232: 51-57.
2. Spanjersberg WR, Reurings J, Keus F, van Laarhoven CJHM,. Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; (2)CD007635.
3. Fotiadis RJ, Badvie S, Weston MD, Allen-Mersh TG,. Epidural analgesia in gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg 2004; 91: 828-841.
4. McLeod G, Davies H, Munnoch N, Bannister J, MacRae W,. Post operative pain relief using thoracic epidural analgesia: outstanding success and disappointing failures. Anaesthesia 2001; 56: 75-81.
5. Levy BF, Scott MJ, Fawcett W, Fry C, Rockall TA,. Randomized clinical trial of epidural, spinal or patient-controlled analgesia for patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 2011; 98: 1068-1078.
6. Ranta PO, Ala-Kokko TI, Kukkonen JE, Ohtonen PP, Raudaskoski TH, Reponen PK, et al., Incisional and epidural analgesia after caesarean delivery: a prospective, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical study. Int J Obstet Anesth 2006; 15: 189-194.
7. Baig MK, Zmora O, Derdemezi J, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD,. Use of the ON-Q pain management system is associated with decreased postoperative analgesic requirement: double blind randomized placebo pilot study. J Am Coll Surg 2006; 202: 297-305.
8. Beaussier M, El'Ayoubi H, Schiffer E, Rollin M, Parc Y, Mazoit JX, et al., Continuous preperitoneal infusion of ropivacaine provides effective analgesia and accelerates recovery after colorectal surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Anesthesiology 2007; 107: 461-468.
9. Cheong WK, Seow-Cheon F, Eu KW, Tang CL, Heah SM,. Randomised clinical trial of local bupivacaine perfusion versus parenteral morphine infusion for pain relief after laparotomy. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 357-359.
10. Corso OH, Morris RG, Hewett PJ, Karatassas A,. The safety of 96-hour incision-site continuous infusion of ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia after bowel resection. Ther Drug Monit 2007; 29: 57-63.
11. Polglase AL, McMurrick PJ, Simpson PJ, Wale RJ, Carne PWG, Johnson W, et al., Continuous wound infusion of local anaesthetic for the control of pain after elective abdominal colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 50: 2158-2167.
12. Bang H, Ni L, Davis CE,. Assessment of blinding in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 2004; 25: 143-156.
13. Fishman B, Pasternak S, Wallenstein SL, Houde RW, Holland JC, Foley KM,. The Memorial Pain Assessment Card. A valid instrument for the evaluation of cancer pain. Cancer 1987; 60: 1151-1158.
14. Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, Glynn RJ, Berkman LF, Blazer DG, et al., A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol 1994; 49: M85-M94.
15. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA,. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 205-213.
16. Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M,. POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg 1991; 78: 356-360.
17. Schneider C, Yale S, Larson M,. Principles of pain management. Clin Med Res 2003; 1: 337-340.
18. Medical Research Council. Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions: New Guidance; 2008. www.mrc.ac.uk/complexinterventionsguidance [accessed 9 November 2012].
19. Treasure T, Waller D, Tan C, Entwisle J, O'Brien M, O'Byrne K, et al., The Mesothelioma and Radical Surgery randomized controlled trial: the Mars feasibility study. J Thorac Oncol 2009; 4: 1254-1258.
20. Academy of Medical Sciences. A New Pathway for the Regulation and Governance of Health Research. Academy of Medical Sciences: London, 2011.
21. Boccola MA, Buettner PG, Rozen WM, Siu SK, Stevenson ARL, Stitz R, et al., Risk factors and outcomes for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: a single-institution analysis of 1576 patients. World J Surg 2010; 35: 186-195.
22. Chapman AE, Levitt MD, Hewett P, Woods R, Sheiner H, Maddern GJ,. Laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal malignancies: a systematic review. Ann Surg 2001; 234: 590-606.
23. Braga M, Vignali A, Gianotti L, Zuliani W, Radaelli G, Gruarin P, et al., Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome. Ann Surg 2002; 236: 759-767.
24. Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taurá P, Piqué JM, et al., Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002; 359: 2224-2229.
25. Janson M, Björholt I, Carlsson P, Haglind E, Henriksson M, Lindholm E, et al., Randomised clinical trial of the costs of open and laparoscopic surgery for colonic cancer. Br J Surg 2004; 91: 409-417.
26. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 2052-2059.
27. Wang LW, Wong SW, Crowe PJ, Khor KE, Jastrzab G, Parasyn AD, et al., Wound infusion with local anaesthesia after laparotomy: a randomized controlled trial. ANZ J Surg 2010; 80: 794-801.
28. Liu SS, Richman JM, Thirlby RC, Wu CL,. Efficacy of continuous wound catheters delivering local anesthetic for postoperative analgesia: a quantitative and qualitative systematic review of randomised controlled trials. J Am Coll Surg 2006; 203: 914-932.
29. Givens VA, Lipscomb GH, Meyer NL,. A randomised trial of postoperative wound irrigation with local anesthetic for pain after cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: 1188-1191.