The effect of propofol on patient reaction time and its relationship with loss of verbal contact before induction of anaesthesia

Anaesthesia

Volumn 68, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 148-153

  Anderson, K J ^a   Allam, S ^b   Chapman, R ^c   Kenny, G N C ^d  

^a FOOTHILLS HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b FORTH VALLEY ROYAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c MONKLANDS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROPOFOL;

ADULT; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ARTICLE; AUDITORY RESPONSE; BLOOD OXYGEN TENSION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG BLOOD LEVEL; DRUG EFFECT; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMAN; MALE; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; OXYGEN TENSION; PILOT STUDY; RESPONSE TIME; SEDATION;

ADULT; ANALGESIA, PATIENT-CONTROLLED; ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; ANESTHETICS, INTRAVENOUS; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PILOT PROJECTS; PROPOFOL; REACTION TIME; SELF ADMINISTRATION; SPEECH;

EID: 84872184715     PISSN: 00032409     EISSN: 13652044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/anae.12035     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Leitch JA, Sutcliffe N, Kenny GN,. Patient-maintained sedation for oral surgery using a target controlled infusion of propofol-a pilot study. British Dental Journal 2003; 194: 43-5.
2. Leitch JA, Anderson K, Gambhir S, et al., A partially blinded randomised controlled trial of patient maintained propofol sedation and operator controlled midazolam sedation in third molar extractions. Anaesthesia 2004; 59: 853-60.
3. Chapman RM, Anderson K, Green J, Leitch JA, Gambhir S, Kenny GNC,. Evaluation of a new effect-site controlled, patient-maintained sedation system in dental patients. Anaesthesia 2006; 61: 345-9.
4. Murdoch JA, Grant SA, Kenny GNC,. Safety of patient-maintained sedation using a target controlled system in healthy volunteers. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2000; 85: 299-301.
5. Henderson F, Absolom AR, Kenny GNC,. Patient-maintained propofol sedation: a follow-up safety study using a modified system in volunteers. Anaesthesia 2001; 57: 387-403.
6. Anderson KJ, Leitch JA, Green JS, Kenny GN,. Effect-site controlled patient maintained sedation: a volunteer safety study. Anaesthesia 2005; 60: 235-8.
7. Grant SA, Murdoch J, Millar K, Kenny GN,. Blood propofol concentration and psychomotor effects on driving skills. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2000; 85: 396-400.
8. Thomson AJ, Nimmo AF, Tiplady B, Glen JB,. Evaluation of a new method of assessing depth of sedation using two-choice visual reaction time testing on a mobile phone. Anaesthesia 2009; 64: 32-8.
9. Haenggi M, Ypparila H, Takala J, et al., Measuring depth of sedation with auditory evoked potentials during controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil in healthy volunteers. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2004; 99: 1728-66.
10. Kim KM, Jeon WJ, Lee DH, Kang WC, Kim JH, Noh GJ,. Changes in visual and auditory response time during conscious sedation with propofol. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2004; 48: 1033-7.
11. Marsh B, White M, Morton N, Kenny GN,. Pharmacokinetic model driven infusion of propofol in children. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1991; 67: 41-8.
12. Chernik DA, Gillings D, Laine H, et al., Validity and reliability of the observer's assessment of alertness/sedation scale: study with intravenous midazolam. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology 1990; 10: 244-51.
13. Sanders AF,. Elements of Human Performance: Reaction Processes and Attention in Human Skill. New Jersey: Psychology Press, 1998: 21.
14. Welford AT,. Choice Reaction Time: Basic Concepts. New York: Academic Press, 1980: 73-128.
15. Mialet J, Bisserbe J, Jacobs A, Pope H,. Two-dimensional anxiety: a confirmation using a computerized neuropsychological testing of attentional performance. European Psychiatry 1996; 11: 344-52.