Designing magnetic field responsive nanofiltration membranes

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 430, Issue , 2013, Pages 70-78

  Yang, Qian ^a,b   Himstedt, Heath H ^c   Ulbricht, Mathias ^b   Qian, Xianghong ^a,b   Ranil Wickramasinghe, S ^a,b  

^a University of Arkansas   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

^c Department of Mechanical Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

Atom transfer radical polymerization; Concentration polarization; Fouling; Surface modification; Water treatment

Indexed keywords

CHAIN DENSITY; CHAIN-ENDS; CONCENTRATION POLARIZATION; FEED STREAMS; GABRIEL SYNTHESIS; GRAFTED CHAINS; GRAFTED POLYMERS; MEMBRANE PERFORMANCE; MODIFIED MEMBRANES; OSCILLATING MAGNETIC FIELDS; PERMEATE FLUX; POLY(2-HYDROXYETHYL METHACRYLATE); POLYHEMA; POLYMERIZATION TIME; SALT REJECTIONS; SUPERPARAMAGNETICS; SURFACE INITIATED-ATOM TRANSFER RADICAL POLYMERIZATION; THIN FILM COMPOSITES;

ATOM TRANSFER RADICAL POLYMERIZATION; CALCIUM CHLORIDE; CHAIN LENGTH; CONTACT ANGLE; DEIONIZED WATER; FOULING; GRAFTING (CHEMICAL); MAGNETIC FIELDS; PHEMA; PHOTOELECTRONS; POLYMERIZATION; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SUPERPARAMAGNETISM; SURFACE TREATMENT; SYNTHESIS (CHEMICAL); WATER TREATMENT; X RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY;

NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES;

POLYAMIDE; SODIUM CHLORIDE; SUPERPARAMAGNETIC IRON OXIDE; WATER;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; DENSITY; FILTER; MAGNETIC FIELD; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; NANOFILTRATION; POLYMERIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SYNTHESIS; WATER TREATMENT; X RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY;

EID: 84872165155     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: 18733123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.11.068     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Gleick P.H., Cooley H., Katz D., Lee E., Morrison J., Palanlappan M., Samulon A., Wolff G.H. The World's Water 2006-2007, the Biennial Report on Freshwater Resources 2006, Island Press, Washington, DC.
2. van der Bruggen B., Geens J. Nanofiltration. Advanced Membrane Technology and Applications 2008, 271-295. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ. N.N. Li, A.G. Fane, W.S.W. Ho, T. Matsuura (Eds.).
3. Conlon W.J., McClellan S.A. Membrane softening: a treatment process comes of age. J. AWWA 1989, 81(11):47-51.
4. Chellam S. Effects of nanofiltration on trihalomethane and haloacetic acid precursor removal and speciation in waters containing low concentrations of bromide ion. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 34(9):1813-1820.
5. Kiso Y., Nishimura Y., Kiato T., Nishimura K. Rejection properties of non-phenylic pesticides with nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 171(2):229-237.
6. Nghiem L.D., Schäfer A.I., Elimelech M. Removal of natural hormones by nanofiltration membranes: measurement, modeling and mechanisms. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38(6):1888-1896.
7. Bargeman G., Timmer M., van der Horst C. Nanofiltration in the food industry. Nanofiltration Principles and Applications 2005, Elsevier, Oxford. A.I. Schäfer, A.G. Fane, T.D. Waite (Eds.).
8. Bhanushali D., Kloos S., Bhattacharyya D. Solute transport in solvent-resistant nanofiltration membranes for non-aqueous systems: experimental results and the role of solute-solvent coupling. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 208(1-2):343-359.
9. Rizwan T., Bhattacharjee S. Initial deposition of colloidal particles on a rough nanofiltration membrane. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2007, 85(5):570-579.
10. Yuan W., Zydney A.L. Humic acid fouling during microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 157(1):1-12.
11. Jones K.L., O'Melia C.R. Protein and humic acid adsorption onto hydrophilic membrane surfaces: effects of pH and ionic strength. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 165(1):31-46.
12. Agenson K.O., Urase T. Change in membrane performance due to organic fouling in nanofiltration (NF)/reverse osmosis (RO) applications. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2007, 55(2):147-156.
13. Deppisch R., Storr M., Buck R., Gohl H. Blood material interactions at the surfaces of membranes in medical applications. Sep. Purif. Technol. 1998, 14(1-3):241-254.
14. Field R.W., Wu D., Howell J.A., Gupta B.B. Critical flux concept for microfiltration fouling. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 100(3):259-272.
15. Czekaj P., López F., Güell C. Membrane fouling during microfiltration of fermented beverages. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 166(2):199-212.
16. Kelly S.T., Zydney A.L. Mechanisms for BSA fouling during microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 107(1-2):115-127.
17. Kilduff J.E., Mattaraj S., Zhou M., Belfort G. Kinetics of membrane flux decline: the role of natural colloids and mitigation via membrane surface modification. J. Nanoparticle Res. 2005, 7(4-5):525-544.
18. Kim J.-S., Akeprathumchai S., Wickramasinghe S.R. Flocculation to enhance microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 182(1-2):161-172.
19. Belfort G., Davis R.H., Zydney A.L. The behavior of suspensions and macromolecular solutions in crossflow microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1994, 96(1-2):1-58.
20. Radovich J.M., Mason N.S., Sparks R.E. Coupling electrophoresis with ultrafiltration for improved processing of plasma-proteins. Sep. Sci. Technol. 1980, 15(8):1491-1498.
21. Ulbricht M. Advanced functional polymer membranes. Polymer 2006, 47(7):2217-2262.
22. Yang Q., Adrus N., Tomicki F., Ulbricht M. Composites of functional polymeric hydrogels and porous membranes. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21(9):2783-2811.
23. Rana D., Matsuura T. Surface modifications for antifouling membranes. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110(4):2448-2471.
24. Schwinge J., Wiley D.E., Fane A.G. Novel spacer design improves observed flux. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 229(1-2):53-61.
25. Schwinge J., Neal P.R., Wiley D.E., Fletcher D.F., Fane A.G. Spiral wound modules and spacers-review and analysis. J Membr. Sci. 2004, 242(1-2):129-153.
26. Silalahi S.H.D., Leiknes T. High frequency back-pulsing for fouling development control in ceramic microfiltration for treatment of produced water. Desalin. Water Treat. 2011, 28(1-3):137-152.
27. Winzeler H.B., Belfort G. Enhanced performance of pressure driven membrane filtration processes: the argument for flow instabilities. J. Membr. Sci. 1992, 80(1-3):35-47.
28. Shaikh R.P., Pillay V., Choonara Y.E., du Toit L.C., Ndesendo V.M.K., Bawa P., Cooppan S. A review of multi-responsive membrane systems for rate-modulated drug delivery. AAPS Pharm. Sci. Tech. 2010, 11(1):441-459.
29. Wandera D., Wickramasinghe S.R., Husson S.M. Stimuli-responsive membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 357(1-2):6-35.
30. Gorey C., Escobar I.C., Gruden C., Coleman M., Mileyeva-Biebesheimer O. Development of smart membrane filters for microbial sensing. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2008, 43(16):4056-4074.
31. Himstedt H.H., Marshall K.M., Wickramasinghe S.R. pH-responsive nanofiltration membranes by surface modification. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 366(1-2):373-381.
32. Gorey C., Escobar I.C. N-isopropylacrylamide (NIPAAM) modified cellulose acetate ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 383(1-2):272-279.
33. Mondal S., Wickramasinghe S.R. Photo-induced graft polymerization of N-isopropyl acrylamide on thin film composite membrane: Produced water treatment and antifouling properties. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2012, 90:231-238.
34. Wandera D., Wickramasinghe S.R., Husson S.M. Modification and characterization of ultrafiltration membranes for treatment of produced water. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 373(1-2):178-188.
35. Tomer N., Mondal S., Wandera D., Wickramasinghe S.R., Husson S.M. Modification of nanofiltration membranes by surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization for produced water filtration. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2009, 44(14):3346-3368.
36. Daniel W., Himstedt H.H., Marroquin M., Wickramasinghe S.R., Husson S.M. Modification of ultrafiltration membranes with block copolymer nanolayers for produced water treatment: the roles of polymer chain density and polymerization time on performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 403:250-260.
37. Himstedt H.H., Yang Q., Dasi L.P., Qian X., Wickramasinghe S.R., Ulbricht M. Magnetically activated micromixers for separation membranes. Langmuir 2011, 27(9):5574-5581.
38. Rosén C., Trägårdh C. Computer simulations of mass transfer in the concentration boundary layer over ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1993, 85(2):139-156.
39. Pellerin E., Michelitsch E., Darcovich K., Lin S., Tam C.M. Turbulent transport in membrane modules by CFD simulation in two dimensions. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 100(2):139-153.
40. Li F., Meindersma G.W., de Haan A.B., Reith T. Optimization of non-woven spacers by CFD and validation by experiments. Desalination 2002, 146(1-3):209-212.
41. Pozrikidis C. Boundary conditions for shear flow past a permeable interface modeled as an array of cylinders. Comput. Fluids 2004, 33(1):1-17.
42. Lipnizki J., Jonsson G. Flow dynamics and concentration polarization in spacer-filled channels. Desalination 2002, 146(1-3):213-217.
43. Gimmelshtein M., Semiat R. Investigation of flow next to membrane walls. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 264(1-2):137-150.
44. Monge S., Giani O., Ruiz E., Cavalier M., Robin J.J. A new route for the modification of halogen end groups to amino end-functionalized poly(tert-butyl acrylate)s. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2007, 28(23):2272-2276.
45. Biswal S.L., Gast A.P. Micromixing with linked chains of paramagnetic particles. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76(21):6448-6455.
46. Biswal S.L., Gast A.P. Rotational dynamics of semiflexible paramagnetic particle chains. Phys. Rev. E 2004, 69(4):041406.
47. Franke T., Schmid L., Weitz D.A., Wixforth A. Magneto-mechanical mixing and manipulation of picoliter volumes in vesicles. Lab Chip 2009, 9(19):2831-2835.
48. Yang Q., Tian J., Hu M.-X., Xu Z.-K. Construction of a comb-like glycosylated membrane surface by a combination of UV-induced graft polymerization and surface-initiated ATRP. Langmuir 2007, 23(12):6684-6690.
49. Yang Q., Ulbricht M. Cylindrical membrane pores with well-defined grafted linear and comblike glycopolymer layers for lectin binding. Macromolecules 2011, 44(6):1303-1310.
50. Tomicki F., Krix D., Nienhaus H., Ulbricht M. Stimuli-responsive track-etched membranes via surface-initiated controlled radical polymerization: Influence of grafting density and pore size. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 377(1-2):124-133.
51. Mänttäri M., Pekuri T., Nyström M. NF270, a new membrane having promising characteristics and being suitable for treatment of dilute effluents from the paper industry. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 242(1-2):107-116.
52. Feng L., Li S., Li Y., Li H., Zhang L., Zhai J., Song Y., Liu B., Jiang L., Zhu D. Super-hydrophobic surfaces: From natural to artificial. Adv. Mater. 2002, 14(24):1857-1860.